The broad application of well-defined synthetic oligosaccharides in glycobiology and glycobiotechnology is largely hampered by the lack of sufficient amounts of synthetic carbohydrate specimens. Insufficient knowledge of the glycosylation reaction mechanism thwarts the routine assembly of these materials. Glycosyl cations are key reactive intermediates in the glycosylation reaction, but their high reactivity and fleeting nature have precluded the determination of clear structure-reactivity-stereoselectivity principles for these species. We report a combined experimental and computational method that connects the stereoselectivity of oxocarbenium ions to the full ensemble of conformations these species can adopt, mapped in conformational energy landscapes (CEL), in a quantitative manner. The detailed description of stereoselective SN1-type glycosylation reactions firmly establishes glycosyl cations as true reaction intermediates and will enable the generation of new stereoselective glycosylation methodology.
The broad application of well-defined synthetic oligosaccharides in glycobiology and glycobiotechnology is largely hampered by the lack of sufficient amounts of synthetic carbohydrate specimens. Insufficient knowledge of the glycosylation reaction mechanism thwarts the routine assembly of these materials. Glycosyl cations are key reactive intermediates in the glycosylation reaction, but their high reactivity and fleeting nature have precluded the determination of clear structure-reactivity-stereoselectivity principles for these species. We report a combined experimental and computational method that connects the stereoselectivity of oxocarbenium ions to the full ensemble of conformations these species can adopt, mapped in conformational energy landscapes (CEL), in a quantitative manner. The detailed description of stereoselective SN1-type glycosylation reactions firmly establishes glycosyl cations as true reaction intermediates and will enable the generation of new stereoselective glycosylation methodology.
Carbohydrates
play numerous
roles in living organisms, as key players in energy housekeeping,
as structural components, and as signaling molecules. To unravel the
roles carbohydrates play in biological processes, well-defined, single
molecules are indispensable, and organic synthesis has been one of
the major suppliers for pure oligosaccharide specimens to fuel glycobiological
and glycomedical research. Although significant progress has been
made in the field, the generation of sufficient amounts of synthetic
(complex) oligosaccharides remains a difficult and time-consuming
undertaking.[1−5] The main obstacle in the construction of oligosaccharides is the
stereoselective construction of 1,2-cis-glycosidic
linkages.[6,7] While 1,2-trans linkages
can be reliably installed using a neighboring group participation
approach, there is no general solution for the construction of 1,2-cis linkages. Different reaction pathways can be followed
during a glycosylation reaction, and these can lead to different diastereomeric
products. Figure depicts
the current understanding of the continuum of mechanisms that is operational
during a glycosylation reaction.[8−10] The activation of a donorglycoside
(I) leads to an array of reactive (electrophilic) intermediates
(II–VIII), formed from the donorglycoside and the activator-derived counterion. In case a participating
group is present at the C2 (such as an O-acyl function),
these reactive intermediates are intramolecularly trapped to provide
a relatively stable dioxolenium ion, that is stereoselectively substituted
from the opposite side of the ring to deliver the 1,2-trans glycoside product. In the absence of a C2-participation functionality,
the situation is more complex, and it has been proposed that both
covalent reactive intermediates (II and VIII) and the reactive oxocarbenium ion (like) species (III–VII) can be the product-forming intermediates.
The covalent intermediates on the SN2 side of the reaction
mechanism continuum can be studied using low-temperature NMR techniques,
and over the years, hundreds of reactive intermediates (triflates,
oxosulfonium ions, among others) have been characterized.[11−18] Substitution of these species with reactive nucleophiles (such as
primary carbohydrate alcohols) defines the SN2 side of
the reaction mechanism continuum. In contrast, the oxocarbenium ions
on the SN1 side of the continuum remain ill understood,
and the intermediacy of these species in glycosylation reactions is
heavily debated.[19−36] Because the lifetime of these intermediates in conventional reaction
media is extremely short, there is currently no (spectroscopic) technique
available to study these species in a direct manner and assess their
behavior.[37−39] It is clear that the substitution pattern on the
carbohydrate ring plays an all-important role in determining the stability
and reactivity of these species, but it has been impossible to establish
clear structure–reactivity-stereoselectivity relationships
because of the conformational freedom and short lifetime of these
reactive intermediates in classical solutions. Thus, the course of
SN1-type glycosylation can, at present, not be properly
understood (let alone predicted), leaving a major gap in the mechanistic
conception of glycosylation reactions.
Figure 1
The reaction mechanism
manifold operational during glycosylation
reactions. Glycosylation reactions are best considered as taking place
at a continuum between two formal extremes of the mechanisms, including
the SN1 and SN2 mechanism. (I) Donor substrate;
(II) reactive covalent α-intermediate; (III) contact ion pair,
with the leaving group associated at the α-face; (IV) solvent-separated
ion pair, with the leaving group that has departed from the α-face;
(V) solvent-separated oxocarbenium ion; (VI) solvent-separated ion
pair, with the leaving group that has departed from the β-face;
(VII) contact ion pair, with the leaving group associated at the β-face;
(VIII) reactive covalent β-intermediate; and (IX) addition product.
P, protection group; E-X, promoter system; and Nu, nucleophile.
The reaction mechanism
manifold operational during glycosylation
reactions. Glycosylation reactions are best considered as taking place
at a continuum between two formal extremes of the mechanisms, including
the SN1 and SN2 mechanism. (I) Donor substrate;
(II) reactive covalent α-intermediate; (III) contact ion pair,
with the leaving group associated at the α-face; (IV) solvent-separated
ion pair, with the leaving group that has departed from the α-face;
(V) solvent-separated oxocarbenium ion; (VI) solvent-separated ion
pair, with the leaving group that has departed from the β-face;
(VII) contact ion pair, with the leaving group associated at the β-face;
(VIII) reactive covalent β-intermediate; and (IX) addition product.
P, protection group; E-X, promoter system; and Nu, nucleophile.To investigate the stability and
reactivity of glycosyl oxocarbenium
ions as product forming intermediates in glycosylation reactions,
we here report the development of a computational method that maps
the stability of these species as a function of their overall shape.
We show that the stereoselectivity of glycosylation reactions employing
weak nucleophiles can be directly related to the conformational energy
landscape (CEL) of the glycosyl oxocarbenium ions, as mapped in silico, and in doing so, define the SN1 side
of the glycosylation reaction mechanism manifold. Direct spectroscopic
evidence for the computed conformers is obtained by the generation
of the oxocarbenium ions under superacid conditions, and it is here
revealed that fully substituted glycopyranosyl oxocarbenium ions react
in a highly stereoselective 1,2-cis manner.We have mapped the energy of glycopyranosyl oxocarbenium ions as
a function of their shape to understand the reactivity of these species
following the strategy outlined in Figure . To generate the CEL maps, plotted on the
Cremer–Pople sphere (a spherical representation describing
all possible conformations a six-membered ring can adopt), we have
generated a suite of conformations by scanning the three dihedral
angles (C1–C2–C3–C4, C3–C4–C5–O5,
and C5–O5–C1–C2) from −60° to 60°
in 15° increments, to fill the complete conformation space (Figure ,1). The geometry
of all these conformers was optimized, and the associated energies
were computed by utilizing DFT as the level of theory, B3LYP as hybrid
functional,[40] and 6-311G(d,p) as the basis
set. Solvation of CH2Cl2 was taken into account
using a polarizable continuum model, and energies are expressed in
Gibbs free energy (for more information, see the Supporting Information).[41] The
energy landscapes were then generated by visualizing the relative
energy in contour plots on “slices” of the pseudo rotational
sphere.[42]
Figure 2
Overview of the workflow to map the conformational
and stereoselective
preference of pyranosyl oxocarbenium ions. (1) The complete conformational
space of a six-membered ring was scanned by computing 729 prefixed
structures. A few canonical conformations (chair, half-chair, envelope,
and boat) are depicted. (2) The associated energies were graphed on
slices dividing the Cremer–Pople sphere. (3) Top- and bottom-face
selective conformers lie in separate areas of the sphere. The family
of the top face-selective (3E, 3H4, E4, and B2,5)-like structures is found in the area contoured
with the red-dashed line, while the bottom face-selective family of
(4E, 4H3, E3, and 2,5B)-like conformers is found on the opposite side of the
sphere, grouped within the blue-dashed line. (4) On the basis of the
Boltzmann distribution of the top- and bottom-face selective structures,
the stereochemical outcome of nucleophilic addition reactions to pyranosyl
oxocarbenium ions can be computed.
Overview of the workflow to map the conformational
and stereoselective
preference of pyranosyl oxocarbenium ions. (1) The complete conformational
space of a six-membered ring was scanned by computing 729 prefixed
structures. A few canonical conformations (chair, half-chair, envelope,
and boat) are depicted. (2) The associated energies were graphed on
slices dividing the Cremer–Pople sphere. (3) Top- and bottom-face
selective conformers lie in separate areas of the sphere. The family
of the top face-selective (3E, 3H4, E4, and B2,5)-like structures is found in the area contoured
with the red-dashed line, while the bottom face-selective family of
(4E, 4H3, E3, and 2,5B)-like conformers is found on the opposite side of the
sphere, grouped within the blue-dashed line. (4) On the basis of the
Boltzmann distribution of the top- and bottom-face selective structures,
the stereochemical outcome of nucleophilic addition reactions to pyranosyl
oxocarbenium ions can be computed.Inspection of the generated energy maps revealed that two
families
of structures are most relevant, the continuum of (3E, 3H4, E4, and B2,5)-like structures
is grouped on the northwest side of the spheres, and these form an
ensemble of structures that are preferentially attacked from the top-face.
The “opposite” family of structures, located on the
southeast side of the sphere, is composed of the range of (4E, 4H3, E3, and 2,5B)-like
conformers, which will likely be approached by an incoming nucleophile
from the bottom-face (see Figure ,3 and the Supporting Information).[20,43] The relative population of all conformational
states can be calculated, on the basis of their relative energies
as computed above, utilizing the Boltzmann equation (see the Supporting Information for more information).
Accordingly, we determined the population of the top- and bottom-face
selective families, which should be a measure for the relative stereoselectivity
of addition reactions with weak nucleophiles to the glycosyl oxocarbenium
ions.To put this workflow to practice, we first investigated
a set of
13 monosubstituted pyranosyl oxocarbenium ions differing by the nature
of the substituent (BnO–, TBDPSO–, N3–,
F–, Cl–, Br–, I–, PhS–, MeS–,
and Me−) as well as the position on the ring. Their structures,
the computed theoretical reaction stereoselectivity, and the experimentally
determined stereoselectivity obtained in reactions with triethylsilane-d (TES-D)[19,44−46] or allyl-trimethyl
silane (AllylTMS) are summarized in Table (entries 1–13). The CEL maps (see Figure a for three representative
examples, all other CEL maps are provided in Figures S3–18) revealed that only a limited region of the full
conformational space is accessible for the monosubstituted ions, in
which local minima are found at both “poles”, centered
around the 3H4- and the 4H3-like conformations. Depending
on the nature of the substituents, one of these families is favored,
placing the substituent either axially or equatorially. At the C4-position,
electronegative substituents (BnO–, F–, TBDPSO–,
N3–, Cl–, and Br−) favor an axial
position to stabilize the oxocarbenium ion by through space electrostatic
interactions, preferentially adopting the 4H3-like conformation.[31,32,47−49] Decreasing electronegativity
and increasing size of the substituent (I–, PhS–, MeS–,
and Me−) translates to a preference to adopt an equatorial
position (3H4-like conformations)
to minimize steric interactions (Figure a). This trend is similar for substituents
at the C3-position. An electronegative BnO-substituent at C-2 is preferentially
placed in a pseudo-equatorial position, as this enables
the hyperconjugative stabilization of the oxocarbenium ion by the pseudo-axial C2–H2 bond. When the population of the
conformational families, as revealed in the CEL maps, are translated
to a calculated stereoselectivity and compared to the stereoselectivity
obtained in the experiments,[31,32,50] it becomes apparent that there is an excellent agreement between
theory and practice. Importantly, not only can highly stereoselective
glycosylations be reliably predicted from the CEL maps, but also the
condensation reactions that proceed with moderate selectivity (Table , entries 6, 7, and
13 for example) are accurately matched by the computed data.
Table 1
Computed and Experimentally
Found
Stereoselectivity for Glycosylation Reactions on Mono- and Multi-Substituted
Pyranosyl Oxocarbenium Ions[56]
Entry
oxocarbenium ion
computed stereoselectivity (cis:trans)a
experimental stereoselectivity (cis:trans)a
yield (%)
1
1 (4-OBn)
<2:98
<2:98
75
2
2 (4-F)
<2:98
4:96
45
3
3 (4-OTBDPS)
8:92
6:94
99
4
4 (4-N3)
12:88
12:88
95
5
5 (4-Cl)
10:90
14:86
90
6
6 (4-Br)
32:68
29:71
87
7
7 (4-I)
73:27
72:28
90
8
8 (4-SPh)
81:19
78:22
87
9
9 (4-SMe)
88:12
84:16
75
10
10 (4-Me)
95:5
94:6
74
11
11 (3-OBn)
90:10
92:8
95
12
12 (3-Me)
4:96
3:97
41
13
13 (2-OBn)
66:34
66:34
85
14
14 (d-lyxose)
>98:2
>98:2
81
15
15 (d-arabinose)
>98:2
>98:2
79
16
16 (d-xylose)
>98:2
>98:2
86
17
17 (2-deoxy-d-xylose)
>98:2
>98:2
74
18
18 (d-ribose)
>98:2
>98:2
69
19
19 (l-fucose)
>98:2
>98:2
74
20
20 (2-deoxy-l-fucose)
<2:98
<2:98
89
21
21 (2-azido-l-fucose)
>98:2
>98:2
65
22
22 (l-rhamnose)
>98:2
>98:2
79
23
23 (2-deoxy-l-rhamnose)
71:29
66:34
96
24
24 (d-glucose)
>98:2
>98:2
70
25
25 (d-glucuronic acid)
>98:2
>98:2
43
26
26 (2-deoxy-d-glucose)
52:48
52:48
76
27
27 (2-azido-d-glucose)
>98:2
>98:2
52
28
28 (d-mannose)
97:3
97:3
93
29
29 (d-mannuronic-acid)
>98:2
>98:2
76
30
30 (2-azido-d-mannuronic-acid)
>98:2
>98:2
53
31
31 (d-galactose)
>98:2
>98:2
86
32
32 (2-deoxy-d-galactose)
<2:98
<2:98
91
For the monosubstituted pyranosides
(entries 1–13), the cis:trans ratio is expressed as the relationship between the substituent and
the coupled nucleophile. For the 2-deoxy-glycosides (entries 17, 20,
23, and 32), the cis:trans ratio
is expressed as the relationship between the substituent on C-3 and
the coupled nucleophile. For the other glycopyranosides (entries 14–16,
18–19, 21–22, and 27–31), the cis:trans ratio is expressed as the relationship between
the substituent on C-2 and the coupled nucleophile. The names in the
table relate to the carbohydrate studied. For the computational studies,
per-O-methylated oxocarbenium ions are used, where
the experimental glycosylation used per-O-benzylated
substrates.[57]
Figure 3
CEL maps of
selected pyranosyl oxocarbenium ions in which the found
local minima are indicated with their respective energy. (A) CEL map
of monosubstituted-pyranosyl oxocarbenium ions 2, 3, and 7. (B) CEL map of multi-substituted-pyranosyl
oxocarbenium ions 16, 19, 22–26, and 28–29.
CEL maps of
selected pyranosyl oxocarbenium ions in which the found
local minima are indicated with their respective energy. (A) CEL map
of monosubstituted-pyranosyl oxocarbenium ions 2, 3, and 7. (B) CEL map of multi-substituted-pyranosyl
oxocarbenium ions 16, 19, 22–26, and 28–29.For the monosubstituted pyranosides
(entries 1–13), the cis:trans ratio is expressed as the relationship between the substituent and
the coupled nucleophile. For the 2-deoxy-glycosides (entries 17, 20,
23, and 32), the cis:trans ratio
is expressed as the relationship between the substituent on C-3 and
the coupled nucleophile. For the other glycopyranosides (entries 14–16,
18–19, 21–22, and 27–31), the cis:trans ratio is expressed as the relationship between
the substituent on C-2 and the coupled nucleophile. The names in the
table relate to the carbohydrate studied. For the computational studies,
per-O-methylated oxocarbenium ions are used, where
the experimental glycosylation used per-O-benzylated
substrates.[57]Next, CEL maps of multisubstituted pyranosyl oxocarbenium
ions
were generated, and the theoretical stereoselectivity of these species
were computed. The results of these studies are summarized in the
second half of Table (entries 14–32). A selection of CEL maps is depicted in Figure b (all CEL maps are
provided in Figures S22–40). Table also reports the
experimental stereoselectivity and yield of the reactions of the thioglycoside
donors, obtained by preactivation of the donors using the diphenyl
sulfoxide (Ph2SO)/triflic anhydride (Tf2O) activator[51] and TES-D as the nucleophile.[52] Again, an excellent agreement is found for the calculated
and experimentally obtained stereoselectivity. The stereoselectivity
of all these condensation reactions can now be traced back to the
families of low-energy conformers of the oxocarbenium ions, as revealed
by the CEL maps. Some maps show a very localized energy minimum for
a particular conformational family, such as the CEL map for the l-fucosyl oxocarbenium ion 19 (Figure b). In the most favorable 3H4-, 3E-, and E4-like conformations of this
ion, the ring substituents at C2 and C4 take up an electronically
favorable orientation, leading to the localized energy minimum around
the 3H4-pole. Nucleophilic
addition to these conformers stereoselectivity provides the 1,2-cis-linked products, and the generated CEL map thus provides
an explanation for the high 1,2-cis-selectivity generally
observed with fucosyl donors.[53−55]Similarly, the mannosyloxocarbenium ion 28 can place
its C2, C3, and C4 substituents in stabilizing positions when adopting
a 3H4/3E-like structure (Figure b), as alluded to by Woerpel and co-workers.[24] These structures are selectively substituted from the top
face to provide the mannosyl product, a result that is indeed born
out in the glycosylation experiment (Table , entry 28). Glycosylations of mannuronic
acid ester 29 proceed with exceptional 1,2-cis stereoselectivity, and the generated CEL map (Figure b) provides an adequate explanation for this
reaction outcome, as a very localized energy minimum is determined
for the 3H4-like conformational
family. The additional stabilization from the axial C5-CO2Me in 29 with respect to the axial C5-CH2OMe group in the mannosyl oxocarbenium ion (28) becomes
very clear from the comparison of the CEL maps of 28 and 29.The CEL maps of pyranosyl oxocarbenium ions bearing
substituents
that have “conflicting positional interests” reveal
that noncanonical conformations can become important, and that broader
conformational families or families around the different poles can
become equally relevant. For example, the d-xylosyl oxocarbenium
ion 16 preferentially adopts a noncanonical flattened
(skew)-boat-like structure (see Figure b). The CEL map for the 2-deoxy-l-rhamnose
ion 23 reveals two conformational families of similar
energy, leading to a mixture of α- and β-products in the
condensation reaction (Table , entry 23). The CEL maps in the gluco-series
illustrate how point mutations in the structure of the parent donor
translate to differently shaped oxocarbenium ions and a different
stereochemical outcome in the glycosylation reactions. The glucopyranosyl
cation 24 is most stable when adopting a 4H3/E4-like
shape, while its glucuronic acid counterpart (25), bearing
a C5-carboxylic acid ester, prefers to adopt a structure in between
the E4 and 2SO-conformations. Both ions are preferentially attacked
from the bottom-face to selectively provide the α-product (Table , entries 24 and 25).
For 2-deoxyglucose 26, two families of oxocarbenium ion
conformers are equally stable, and the population of 4H3/4E-like and 3H4/E4-like states leads to an unselective addition reaction, leading to
the formation of α- and β-products in almost equal amounts.Overall, there is an excellent agreement between the calculated
and experimentally established α/β-selectivity of the
multi-substituted glycosides, providing very compelling evidence for
(families of) glycopyranosyl oxocarbenium ion conformers as product-forming
intermediates in the substitution reactions; thereby defining the
SN1 side of the glycosylation reaction mechanism manifold.To obtain direct experimental evidence for the conformations computed
using our CEL mapping method, we studied two 2-deoxy diacetylated
oxocarbenium ions derived from l-fucose 33 and l-rhamnose 34 in “non-nucleophilic”
superacidic media (Figure a).[37] The choice of the acetyl
group and 2-deoxy position is guided by the fact that methoxy groups
are prone to elimination, and so far, C-2 substituents able to provide
the corresponding glycosyl cation are limited. As the acetyl groups
at C-3 and C-4 of the oxocarbenium ions generated from donors 33 and 34 will be protonated under the superacid
conditions used, polycationic oxocarbenium ions 35 and 36 were subjected to the CEL mapping method. The CEL map for
2-deoxy-fucosyl oxocarbenium ion 35 (Figure c) shows a strong preference
for the 3H4 and closely related E4 conformations. The CEL map for the 2-deoxy-rhamnosyl
oxocarbenium ion 36, on the other hand, features multiple
local minima, and both the 3H4 and the 4H3 family are relatively
low in energy, resulting in a conformational mixture in solution.
In parallel, 2-deoxy-l-fucose and 2-deoxy-l-rhamnose
acetates 33 and 34 were dissolved in HF/SbF5 to generate the polycationic structures 35 and 36, of which the NMR spectra (Figure b) clearly indicated the presence of an oxocarbenium
ion as the main species (carboxonium signal 35: δC1 = 223.4 ppm and δH1 = 8.76 ppm; 36: δC1 = 224.2 ppm and δH1 = 8.84
ppm).[37,58] Both ester groups were indeed protonated,
as revealed by the presence of two proton singlets at δH = 13.27 and 13.35 ppm. Because of the sufficient lifespan
of 35 and 36 in the superacid media, full
conformational characterization of these species could be performed
(see the SI for more information). The
coupling constants of the ring protons of 35 indicate
that it adopts a stable 3H4-like conformation. The NMR spectrum of 2-deoxy-l-rhamnosyl
oxocarbenium 36 (Figure d), on the other hand, showed significant line broadening
as a result of conformational flexibility of this species. Using the
relevant conformations, obtained from the CEL maps for these ions,
we reconstituted the NMR spectrum using the Boltzmann weighted averaged
coupling constants of ions 35 and 36. Perfect
agreement between the experimental NMR spectra for these peracetylated
polyprotonated glycosyl cations and their simulated spectra show that
conformational dynamics of these ions are well captured by the CEL
mapping method.
Figure 4
Generation and NMR spectra of 2-deoxy-pyranosyl oxocarbenium
ions
in HF/SbF5 at −40 °C. (A) Generation of ion 35 and 36 in HF/SbF5. (B) Experimental 1H- and 13C DEPT NMR of 2-deoxy-l-rhamnose
oxocarbenium 34. (C) The generated 1H NMR
spectrum of the oxocarbenium 35 compared to the simulated
spectrum based on the computed CEL. (D) The generated 1H NMR spectrum of the oxocarbenium 36 compared to the
simulated spectrum based on the computed CEL.
Generation and NMR spectra of 2-deoxy-pyranosyl oxocarbenium
ions
in HF/SbF5 at −40 °C. (A) Generation of ion 35 and 36 in HF/SbF5. (B) Experimental 1H- and 13C DEPT NMR of 2-deoxy-l-rhamnoseoxocarbenium 34. (C) The generated 1H NMR
spectrum of the oxocarbenium 35 compared to the simulated
spectrum based on the computed CEL. (D) The generated 1H NMR spectrum of the oxocarbenium 36 compared to the
simulated spectrum based on the computed CEL.In conclusion, we have benchmarked the SN1 side
of the
glycosylation reaction mechanism. The stability, reactivity, and conformational
mobility of glycosyl oxocarbenium ions can be fully understood by
mapping the complete conformational energy landscape of these ions,
and the preference of the cations can be directly related to the experimental
stereochemical outcome of addition reactions to these. The maps show,
in detail, how the stereoelectronic effects of various ring substituents
(halogens, chalcogens, azides, and carbon-based substituents) determine
the overall shape of the cations and thereby the stereochemical course
of the reactions. In addition, the simulated NMR spectra of selected
ions, reconstituted by using the Boltzmann weighted averaged coupling
constants determined by the CEL mapping method, perfectly fit with
the experimental ones observed by low-temperature NMR in superacid.
Where glycosyl oxocarbenium ions were previously thought to be at
the basis of nonselective coupling reactions because of their high
reactivity, we here show that these species, including the ions derived
from l-fucose, l-rhamnose, d-glucose, d-mannose, and d-galactose, have an intrinsic preference
to generate the challenging 1,2-cis-linkages. This
will enable the stereoselective synthesis of C-glycosides
and open up new avenues to develop stereoselective O-glycosylation reactions.[59] The mechanistic
insight offered here will be instrumental in the interpretation of
future glycosylation results and serve as the basis to further explore
the glycosylation reaction mechanism. The uncovered stereoelectronic
substituent effects will be relevant in many other transformations,
involving carbocationic intermediates, and the strategy that we developed
to grasp the full conformational space of these flexible intermediates
can be a blueprint for the study of other flexible reactive intermediates.
Authors: Marthe T C Walvoort; Jasper Dinkelaar; Leendert J van den Bos; Gerrit Lodder; Herman S Overkleeft; Jeroen D C Codée; Gijsbert A van der Marel Journal: Carbohydr Res Date: 2010-03-04 Impact factor: 2.104
Authors: Leticia Ayala; Claudia G Lucero; Jan Antoinette C Romero; Sarah A Tabacco; K A Woerpel Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2003-12-17 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Erwin R van Rijssel; Pieter van Delft; Gerrit Lodder; Herman S Overkleeft; Gijsbert A van der Marel; Dmitri V Filippov; Jeroen D C Codée Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2014-07-31 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Javier Iglesias-Fernández; Susan M Hancock; Seung Seo Lee; Maola Khan; Jo Kirkpatrick; Neil J Oldham; Katherine McAuley; Anthony Fordham-Skelton; Carme Rovira; Benjamin G Davis Journal: Nat Chem Biol Date: 2017-06-12 Impact factor: 15.040
Authors: Hidde Elferink; Marion E Severijnen; Jonathan Martens; Rens A Mensink; Giel Berden; Jos Oomens; Floris P J T Rutjes; Anouk M Rijs; Thomas J Boltje Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2018-05-07 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Krystyna M Demkiw; Wouter A Remmerswaal; Thomas Hansen; Gijsbert A van der Marel; Jeroen D C Codée; K A Woerpel Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 16.823
Authors: Wouter A Remmerswaal; Kas J Houthuijs; Roel van de Ven; Hidde Elferink; Thomas Hansen; Giel Berden; Herman S Overkleeft; Gijsbert A van der Marel; Floris P J T Rutjes; Dmitri V Filippov; Thomas J Boltje; Jonathan Martens; Jos Oomens; Jeroen D C Codée Journal: J Org Chem Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 4.198
Authors: Girish C Sati; Joshua L Martin; Yishu Xu; Tanmay Malakar; Paul M Zimmerman; John Montgomery Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Antonio Franconetti; Ana Ardá; Juan Luis Asensio; Yves Blériot; Sébastien Thibaudeau; Jesús Jiménez-Barbero Journal: Acc Chem Res Date: 2021-04-30 Impact factor: 22.384