| Literature DB >> 31139623 |
Tao Zhu1,2, Xing Zhang1, Yiwei Han1, Tongshen Liu3, Baodong Wang4, Zhonghua Zhang4.
Abstract
In China, coal fly ash is a large-scale solid waste generated by power plants. The high value utilization of coal fly ash has always been a hot research issue in China for these years. In this paper, the synthesis of zeolite X using aluminum residue from coal fly ash can not only realize the resource utilization of waste, but also achieve the effect of energy saving and emission reduction. Zeolite X prepared by hydrothermal synthesis method have been found to have higher purity and better crystallinity by chemical composition analysis. By comparing and analyzing the adsorption performance of zeolite X and activated carbon on volatile organic compounds, it is found that the adsorption capacity of zeolite X is higher than that of activated carbon, and it has stronger stability. This indicates that the zeolite X synthesized by this environmentally friendly and economical method has a good application prospect in adsorbing volatile organic compounds.Entities:
Keywords: activated carbon; adsorption performance; aluminum residue; coal fly ash; volatile organic compounds; zeolite X
Year: 2019 PMID: 31139623 PMCID: PMC6527775 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00341
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1Process diagram for synthesizing zeolite X by aluminum residue.
Chemical analysis of coal fly ash and aluminum residue.
| Coal fly ash/% | 35.0 | 54.4 | 0.404 | 3.77 | 2.43 | 1.99 | 0.12 |
| Aluminum residue/% | 78.7 | 13.4 | 0.163 | 0.37 | 5.2 | 0.445 | 0.03 |
Figure 2XRD diffraction pattern of aluminum residue.
Figure 3Variation of silica concentration with reaction time.
Figure 4VOCs adsorption experimental apparatus.
XRF analysis of zeolite X samples.
| Weight/% | 18.2 | 32.3 | 48.9 | 0.114 | 0.413 | 0.0589 |
Figure 5EDS analysis of zeolite X samples.
Elemental analysis of zeolite X samples.
| Weight/% | 53.91 | 12.74 | 14 | 19.34 |
| Atomic/% | 65.66 | 10.8 | 10.11 | 13.42 |
Figure 6XRD diffraction pattern of zeolite X samples.
Figure 7SEM image of zeolite X samples.
Physical parameters of VOCs.
| Cyclohexane | 84 | 0.78 | 80.7 | 10.34 | 0.61 |
| Benzene | 78 | 0.88 | 80.1 | 10.03 | 0.53 |
| Isopropanol | 60 | 0.79 | 82.4 | 4.400 | 0.47 |
Figure 8Adsorption curves of cyclohexane by zeolite X and activated carbon.
Figure 10Adsorption curves of isopropanol by zeolite X and activated carbon.
Adsorption performance of VOCs by zeolite X.
| Cyclohexane | 46 | 16 | 88 | 117 |
| Benzene | 52 | 23 | 96 | 136 |
| Isopropanol | 54 | 27 | 102 | 141 |
Adsorption performance of VOCs by activated carbon.
| Cyclohexane | 22 | 13 | 62 | 85 |
| Benzene | 36 | 18 | 94 | 96 |
| Isopropanol | 38 | 25 | 84 | 103 |