| Literature DB >> 31139603 |
Chryso P Katsoufis1,2, Marissa J DeFreitas1,3, Juan C Infante2,4, Miguel Castellan2,5, Teresa Cano2, Daniela Safina Vaccaro2, Wacharee Seeherunvong1,2, Jayanthi J Chandar3,6, Carolyn L Abitbol1,2.
Abstract
Recent advances in the early diagnosis of fetal CAKUT with an increase in fetal surgical interventions have led to a growing number of neonatal survivors born with severe renal dysfunction. This, in turn, has required the development of multi-disciplinary treatment paradigms in the individualized management of these infants with advanced stage kidney disease from birth. Early multi-modal management includes neonatal surgical interventions directed toward establishing adequate urine flow, respiratory support with the assessment of pulmonary hypoplasia, and establishing metabolic control to avoid the need for dialysis intervention. The development of specialized imaging to assess for residual renal mass with non-invasive 3-dimensional techniques are rapidly evolving. The use of non-radioactive imaging offers improved safety and allows for early prognostic-based planning including anticipatory guidance for progression to end stage renal disease (ESRD). The trajectory of kidney function during the neonatal period as determined by peak and nadir serum creatinine (SCr) and cystatin C (CysC) during the first months of life provides a guide toward individualized prospective management. This is a single center experience based on a birth cohort of 42 subjects followed prospectively from birth for an average of 6.1 ± 2.8 years at the University of Miami/Holtz Children's Hospital during the past decade. There was an 8:1 male: female ratio. The birth cohort was divided into 3 subgroups according to CKD Stages at the current age: CKD 1-2 (Group 1) (eGFR ≥ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) (N = 15), CKD stage 3-5 (Group 2) (eGFR ≤ 59 ml/min/1.73 m2) (N = 12), and ESRD-Dialysis and/or Transplantation (Group 3) (N = 15). A neonatal CysC >3.0 mg/L predicted progression to ESRD while a nadir SCr >0.6 mg/dL predicted progression to CKD 3-5 with the highest specificity and sensitivity by ROC-AUC analysis (P < 0.0001). Medical management was directed toward nutritional support with novel formula designs, early introduction of growth hormone and strict control of mineral bone disorder. One of the central aspects of the management was to avoid dialysis for as long as feasible with a primary goal toward pre-emptive transplantation.Entities:
Keywords: biomarkers of early CKD; cystatin C; nadir creatinine; neonatal CAKUT; peak creatinine
Year: 2019 PMID: 31139603 PMCID: PMC6527773 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2019.00182
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pediatr ISSN: 2296-2360 Impact factor: 3.418
Patient demographics.
| Age (years) | Mean ± SD | 5.8 ± 2.9 |
| Race, | ||
| Caucasian | 8 (19%) | |
| Hispanic | 9 (21%) | |
| African | 25 (60%) | |
| Gender, | ||
| Male | 37 (88%) | |
| Female | 5 (12%) | |
| Birth weight [grams ± SD] | 2,712 ± 660 | |
| Gestational Age [weeks ± SD] | 36 ± 3 | |
| CKD Stage, | ||
| Group 1 | 15 (36%) | |
| Group 2 | 12 (28%) | |
| Group 3 | 15 (36%) | |
| Primary Diagnosis, | ||
| Posterior Urethral Valves | 24 (57%) | |
| Prune Belly Syndrome | 7 (17%) | |
| Bilateral Hypodysplasia | 5 (12%) | |
| VACTERL | 4 (10%) | |
| Bilateral UPJ | 1 (2%) | |
| Ureteroceles with BOO | 1 (2%) | |
SD, Standard deviation; CKD, Chronic kidney disease; ESRD, End Stage Renal Disease; VACTERL, vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac defects, tracheo-esophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities; UPJ, ureteropelvic junction obstruction; BOO, Bladder outlet obstruction.
Neonatal characteristics as predictors of progression to CKD.
| Group 1 ( | 6.1 ± 2.8 | 37 ± 3 | 2,964 ± 680 | 0.4 ± 1.6 | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.5 | 48 ± 9 |
| Group 2 ( | 6.4 ± 3.1 | 36 ± 5 | 2,653 ± 824 | −0.5 ± 1.4 | 3.2 ± 1.3 | 1.4 ± 0.9 | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 31 ± 13 |
| Group 3 ( | 6.3 ± 2.7 | 34 ± 2 | 2,463 ± 550 | −1.1 ± 1.4 | 4.0 ± 1.1 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 4.0 ± 0.7 | 20 ± 3 |
| Females ( | 8.0 (5,10) | 34 (32,36) | 2,150 (2,108, 2,450) | −1.4 (−2.4, −0.9) | 3.7 (1.7, 4.0) | 1.9 (0.6, 2.2) | 3.7 (1.9, 3.9) | 21 (20, 46) |
| Males ( | 5.6 ± 2.8 | 36 ± 3 | 2,775 ± 676 | −0.3 ± 1.6 | 2.7 ± 1.7 | 1.2 ± 1.0 | 2.6 ± 1.3 | 34 ± 15 |
CAKUT, Congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract; CKD, chronic kidney disease; GA, gestational age; SCr, serum creatinine; CysC, cystatin C; Mean ± SD, Standard deviation; median (IQR), interquartile range; mg/dL, milligrams/deciliter; mg/L, milligrams/liter; ESRD, End Stage Kidney Disease (Dialysis and/or Transplantation); eGFRcys, estimated glomerular filtration rate by cystatin C equation; SDS, standard deviation score; Tx, transplant; PETx, pre-emptive transplant.
p < 0.05 significantly different from the similarly marked variable.
p < 0.01 significantly different from the similarly marked variable.
p < 0.001 significantly different from similarly marked variable.
Figure 1Odds ratios for prediction of early progression to advanced kidney disease. ⋆p < 0.05; ⋆⋆p < 0.01; ⋆⋆⋆p < 0.001.
Receiver operating curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) analyses for biomarker assessment of prediction to early progression to end stage kidney disease (ESRD) (Group 3) (A) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD 3–5 + ESRD) (Groups 2 and 3) (B).
| Peak SCr (mg/dL) | 0.87 | ≥ 2.0 | 64 | 93 | 9.5 | <0.001 |
| Nadir SCr (mg/dL) | 0.89 | ≥ 0.6 | 64 | 93 | 9.6 | <0.0001 |
| ≥1.0 | 80 | 93 | 12.0 | |||
| Cystatin C (mg/L) | 0.93 | ≥ 3.0 | 77 | 92 | 10.1 | <0.0001 |
| Peak SCr (mg/dL) | 0.94 | ≥ 2.0 | 93 | 96 | 21.4 | <0.0001 |
| Nadir SCr (mg/dL) | 0.96 | ≥ 0.6 | 93 | 92 | 11.7 | <0.0001 |
| ≥ 0.7 | 100 | 88 | 7.8 | |||
| Cystatin C (mg/L) | 0.93 | ≥ 2.0 | 85 | 91 | 9.3 | <0.0001 |
ESRD, End Stage Renal Disease; SCr, serum creatinine; AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 2(A,B) Receiver operating curve (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) for biomarker assessment of prediction to early progression to end stage kidney disease (ESRD) (Group 3) (A) and advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD 3–5 + ESRD) Group 2 and 3 (B).
Figure 3(A,B) Patient and renal survival curves according to Stage of CKD. (A) shows the survival curves of the 3 major subgroups comparing early stage and pre-dialysis CKD (Groups 1 and 2) vs. ESRD (Group 3). (B) shows the survival curves with the advanced CKD (Group 3) divided into the dialysis patients vs. those who were managed conservatively without dialysis until pre-emptive transplantation (TX: transplantation).
Figure 4(A,B) Linear growth by chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage (A) and growth pre and post-transplant (B).
Figure 5Arteriogram showing early bifurcation of the aorta below the renal vessels with absence of the aorta below the superior mesenteric artery in a CAKUT patient with urogenital sinus anomalies.