INTRODUCTION: Long term prospective data comparing the efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon ablation (CRYO) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is lacking. We report the long-term outcomes of a randomized control trial comparing CRYO to RF ablation, or a novel COMBINED approach (RF followed by CRYO) for PAF. We studied the number and pattern of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections in patients undergoing repeat procedure(s). The COMBINED approach had significantly higher single procedure success rate and is associated with the fewest reconnected PVs. METHODS: 203 patients who underwent first time PAF ablation in a randomized clinical trial comparing CRYO (67), RF (67) and COMBINED (69) approaches were followed up. All patients with symptomatic recurrence of AF were offered a repeat procedure(s). Reconnected PV(s) at repeat procedure(s) were recorded. In a subset, the PV reconnection sites during the first repeat procedure were prospectively assessed and categorised into one of 8 segments. . RESULTS: At 5 years, 57% of COMBINED patients remained free of AF after a single procedure compared to 47% CRYO and 19% RF patients (p<0.001 COMBINED vs RF and CRYO vs RF, p=0.043 COMBINED vs CRYO). During the first repeat procedure, theCOMBINED group had less number of reconnected PVs (mean number of reconnected PVs in the COMBINED group 1.2 vs 2.3 CRYO and 2.4 RF, p=0.034). There was a different pattern of PV reconnection comparing the CRYO and RF groups. CONCLUSION: The COMBINED approach had a significantly higher single procedure success rate with fewer reconnected PVs and fewer reconnection sites compared to either CRYO or RF alone. CRYO in turn was superior to RF. PV reconnection pattern differed between CRYO and RF and the synergistic effect of the COMBINED approach may explain the improved single procedure efficacy.
INTRODUCTION: Long term prospective data comparing the efficacy of radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon ablation (CRYO) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is lacking. We report the long-term outcomes of a randomized control trial comparing CRYO to RF ablation, or a novel COMBINED approach (RF followed by CRYO) for PAF. We studied the number and pattern of pulmonary vein (PV) reconnections in patients undergoing repeat procedure(s). The COMBINED approach had significantly higher single procedure success rate and is associated with the fewest reconnected PVs. METHODS: 203 patients who underwent first time PAF ablation in a randomized clinical trial comparing CRYO (67), RF (67) and COMBINED (69) approaches were followed up. All patients with symptomatic recurrence of AF were offered a repeat procedure(s). Reconnected PV(s) at repeat procedure(s) were recorded. In a subset, the PV reconnection sites during the first repeat procedure were prospectively assessed and categorised into one of 8 segments. . RESULTS: At 5 years, 57% of COMBINED patients remained free of AF after a single procedure compared to 47% CRYO and 19% RF patients (p<0.001 COMBINED vs RF and CRYO vs RF, p=0.043 COMBINED vs CRYO). During the first repeat procedure, theCOMBINED group had less number of reconnected PVs (mean number of reconnected PVs in the COMBINED group 1.2 vs 2.3 CRYO and 2.4 RF, p=0.034). There was a different pattern of PV reconnection comparing the CRYO and RF groups. CONCLUSION: The COMBINED approach had a significantly higher single procedure success rate with fewer reconnected PVs and fewer reconnection sites compared to either CRYO or RF alone. CRYO in turn was superior to RF. PV reconnection pattern differed between CRYO and RF and the synergistic effect of the COMBINED approach may explain the improved single procedure efficacy.
Entities:
Keywords:
Atrial Fibrillation; Catheter Ablation; Cryo Balloon Ablation; Long Term Outcomes ; Pulmonary Vein Reconnection; Radio frequency Catheter Ablation
Authors: Andrea Natale; Antonio Raviele; Thomas Arentz; Hugh Calkins; Shih-Ann Chen; Michel Haïssaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yen Ho; Karl Heinz Kuck; Francis Marchlinski; Carlo Napolitano; Douglas Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric N Prystowsky; Richard Schilling; Dipen Shah; Sakis Themistoclakis; Atul Verma Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2007-05
Authors: Michael Kühne; Yves Suter; David Altmann; Peter Ammann; Beat Schaer; Stefan Osswald; Christian Sticherling Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2010-10-12 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Pipin Kojodjojo; Mark D O'Neill; Phang Boon Lim; Louisa Malcolm-Lawes; Zachary I Whinnett; Tushar V Salukhe; Nicholas W Linton; David Lefroy; Anthony Mason; Ian Wright; Nicholas S Peters; Prapa Kanagaratnam; D Wyn Davies Journal: Heart Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Markus Linhart; Barbara Bellmann; Erica Mittmann-Braun; Jan W Schrickel; Alexander Bitzen; René Andrié; Alexander Yang; Georg Nickenig; Lars Lickfett; Thorsten Lewalter Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2009-12
Authors: Ermengol Valles; Roger Fan; Jean François Roux; Christopher F Liu; John D Harding; Sandhya Dhruvakumar; Mathew D Hutchinson; Michael Riley; Rupa Bala; Fermin C Garcia; David Lin; Sanjay Dixit; David J Callans; Edward P Gerstenfeld; Francis E Marchlinski Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2008-10-21 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Kim Rajappan; Peter M Kistler; Mark J Earley; Glyn Thomas; Maite Izquierdo; Simon C Sporton; Richard J Schilling Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 1.976