| Literature DB >> 31139255 |
Nazia Hossain1, T M I Mahlia2, R Saidur3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microalgae have been experimented as a potential feedstock for biofuel generation in current era owing to its' rich energy content, inflated growth rate, inexpensive culture approaches, the notable capacity of CO2 fixation, and O2 addition to the environment. Currently, research is ongoing towards the advancement of microalgal-biofuel technologies. The nano-additive application has been appeared as a prominent innovation to meet this phenomenon. MAIN TEXT: The main objective of this study was to delineate the synergistic impact of microalgal biofuel integrated with nano-additive applications. Numerous nano-additives such as nano-fibres, nano-particles, nano-tubes, nano-sheets, nano-droplets, and other nano-structures' applications have been reviewed in this study to facilitate microalgae growth to biofuel utilization. The present paper was intended to comprehensively review the nano-particles preparing techniques for microalgae cultivation and harvesting, biofuel extraction, and application of microalgae-biofuel nano-particles blends. Prospects of solid nano-additives and nano-fluid applications in the future on microalgae production, microalgae biomass conversion to biofuels as well as enhancement of biofuel combustion for revolutionary advancement in biofuel technology have been demonstrated elaborately by this review. This study also highlighted the potential biofuels from microalgae, numerous technologies, and conversion processes. Along with that, the study recounted suitability of potential microalgae candidates with an integrated design generating value-added co-products besides biofuel production.Entities:
Keywords: Biodiesel; Bioenergy; Microalgae; Microalgal biofuel; Nano-additives
Year: 2019 PMID: 31139255 PMCID: PMC6528301 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-019-1465-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Fig. 1Nano-additive applications for the enhancement of microalgae cultivation to biofuel implementation
Several potential microalgae species for biofuel production, type, and description of the species in brief [35–42]
| Microalgae name | Type | Description in brief |
|---|---|---|
|
| Chlorophyta | Genetically modified by sex-cross, contains high amount of carbohydrate, lipid and protein in cell wall |
| Chlorophyta | Unicellular green microalgae, source availability of tropical water with enough solar light | |
|
| Chlorophyta | Spiral-shaped multi-cellular microalgae (with no true nucleus), fresh water habitant, contains lipopolysaccharides and peptidoglycan (carbohydrate components) in cell wall as well as cyanophycean and starch are the main carbohydrate storage products |
|
| Chlorophyta | Spherical shaped, single cellular (with nucleus) microalgae, grows in both fresh and marine water with adequate sunlight, contains cellulose and hemicelluloses (carbohydrate components) in cell wall and starch is the main carbohydrate storage product |
|
| Chlorophyta | Green microalgae, shape type pyramidal, source availability of tropical and oligotrophic freshwater such as lakes, ponds, estuaries |
|
| Chlorophyta | Eukaryote and unicellular |
|
| Phaeodactylum | Salt water diatoms |
| Heterokont | Grown in both saline and fresh water, genetically modified and paralleled recombinant microalgae type | |
| Fungia repanda | Source availability in sea water, advanced eukaryotic, dinoflagellates | |
| Phytoplanktons | Either prokaryotic or eukaryotic | Usually autotrophic, source availability at saline and tropical water sources such as lakes, ponds with sufficient solar energy |
| Cyanobacterial Mats | Prokaryotic | Easily grown in saline water |
|
| Brown type of microalgae | Grown at sea and coastal water sources |
| Cyanobacteria/blue–green algae | Shape type spiral, source availability in usually moist environment, marine and fresh water sources, grown randomly in tropical areas where sunlight is available sufficiently |
Approximate carbohydrate–protein–lipid–ash content composition of suitable microalgae species (dry weight) for biofuel production [32, 43–45]
| Type of microalgae | Total sugars (%) | Protein (%) | Lipids (%) | Others (including ash content) % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 48 | 17 | 21 | 14 |
| 56 | 22 | 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 55 | 16 | 9 | |
|
| 35 | 50 | 11 | 4 |
|
| 60 | 12 | 8 | 20 |
|
| 57 | 32 | 6 | 5 |
| 3 | 24 | 15 | 3 | |
| 2 | 18 | 18 | 3 | |
| 9 | 74 | 15 | 2 | |
| 18 | 56 | 12 | – |
Fig. 2Process flow diagram of carbon capture, water treatment and biofuels production from microalgae incorporated with nano-particles [18, 25, 49–54]
Possible biofuels from microalgae and conversion processes
| Biofuel | Conversion processes | Some potential nano-additives for biofuel yield enhancement | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bioethanol, biobutanol, biomethanol, bioaceton | Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) Separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF) Simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF) Separate hydrolysis and co-fermentation (SHCF) Dark fermentation Photo fermentation Anaerobic fermentation Acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) fermentation Consolidated bioprocessing | Fe2O3, CeO2-CNT and others | [ |
| Biodiesel | Lipid hydrolysis and chemical, physical, enzymatic transesterification Interesterification Acidolysis Alcoholysis associated with glycerolysis Folch method (use of chloroform–methanol) Bligh and dyer method (use of chloroform–methanol) Modified method of the Folch/Bligh and dyer methods (use of methyl-tert-butyl-ether) Superior solvent extraction method (use of chloroform) Direct or in situ supercritical transesterification Post-transesterification Wet extraction method Deep eutectic solvent (DES) method | ZrO2, TiO2, Al2O3, CeO2, SiO2, Fe2O3, CaO-NPs and others | [ |
| Syngas | Gasification Pyrolysis Direct combustion Bio-electrochemical fuel cells Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) Hydrothermal gasification | TiO2, CeO2 and others | [ |
| Bio-electricity | Bio-electrochemical system contain anode, cathode and electrode Direct combustion | Fe2O3, CeO2-CNT, CaO-NPs and others | [ |
| Biomethane | Anaerobic digestion Catalytic hydrothermal gasification | SiO2, nano-particles of platinum (Pt), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), iron (Fe) and others | [ |
| Bio-hydrogen | Solid-state anaerobic digestion Biophotolysis Photobiological hydrogen production Dark fermentation Photo fermentation Solid-state fermentation Suspended fermentation | TiO2, CeO2 and others | [ |
| Bio-oil and bio-char | Hydrothermal (thermochemical) liquefaction Pyrolysis Expeller press Bead beating Ultrasound assisted extraction method Microwave extraction method Electroporation/electropermeabilization Slow pyrolysis Fast pyrolysis Torrefaction Hydrothermal carbonization Hydrothermal liquefaction Ion exchange Wet imprgenation Catalytic hydropyrolysis Hydrogenation Hydrodeoxygenation | CeO2-CNT, SiO2-MgO nanohybrids and others | [ |
Applications of different dosages of nano-particles on biofuels and combinations of biofuel nano-particle blend and application output
| Microalgal and other biofuel | Sources for biofuel extraction | Nano-particles (NPs) | Dosage | Combinations of biofuel and nano-particle blends | Application output | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biodiesel |
| ZrO2 | 50 ppm 100 ppm | B2050 ppm B20100 ppm | Reduction of hydrocarbon (HC), carbon-mono oxide (CO) Nitrogen oxides (NO | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| TiO2 | 100 ppm 200 ppm | BD100T100 ppm BD100T200 ppm | Reduction of 5.8% unburned HC, 9.3% CO, 2.7% smoke and 6.6% NO | [ |
| Biodiesel blended with diesel |
| Al2O3 CeO2 | 30 ppm 30 ppm | B20A30C30 ppm | 12% improved brake thermal efficiency Reduction of 30% NO | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| Al2O3 CeO2 | 30 ppm 30 ppm | B100A30C30 ppm | Improved brake thermal efficiency Reduction of NO | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| TiO2 SiO2 | 50 ppm 100 ppm | B20TiO2SiO250 ppm B20TiO2SiO2100 ppm | Increased calorific value Decrease in brake-specific fuel consumption (BSFC) Improved brake thermal efficiency (BTE) Reduction of ignition delay time Improved brake thermal efficiency Improvement of combustion characteristics Minimum CO, HC Maximum NO | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| Rh2O3 | 100 nm | B100Rh2O3 | Reduces CO, 37% NO Improvement of thermal efficiency | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| Co3O4 | 100 mg/l 38–70 nm | B100Co3O4 | 1.03% better engine performance than usual biodiesel combustion Reduction of smoke and 7.46% NO | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| Al–Mg | 100 mg/l 38–70 nm | B100Al-Mg | Better engine performance than usual biodiesel combustion Reduction of smoke and 16.33% NO | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| Al2O3 Al2O3 Carbon nano-tube (CNT) Al2O3CNT | 25 ppm 50 ppm | BAl2O3 ppm BAl2O3 ppm BCNT25 ppm BCNT50 ppm BAl2O3CNT 25 ppm | Considerable enhancement of brake thermal efficiency Marginal reduction of harmful emissions Improved heat transfer rate Short ignition delay effect Enhancement of heat conduction properties and surface area/volume ratio | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| Ag2O | 5 ppm | B100Ag2O 5 ppm | Decrease of 12.22% CO, 10.89% HC, 4.24% NOx and 6.61% smoke Enhancement of brake thermal efficiency with reduction in brake-specific fuel consumption | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| Ag2O | 10 ppm | B100Ag2O 10 ppm | Reduction of 16.47% CO, 14.21% HC, 6.66% NO Significant improvement of brake thermal efficiency with reduction in brake-specific fuel consumption | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| Co3O4 | – | B10Co3O4 B20Co3O4 B100 Co3O4 | Reduction of the ignition delay Improvement of combustion by its’ catalytic effect Burning of the carbon deposits Reduction of black smoke | [ |
| Biodiesel–bioethanol | Vegetable oil–alcohol | Fe2O3 | 150 ppm | BB Fe2O3150 ppm | 1% increase in thermal efficiency 60% reduction of emission characteristics, reduction of NO Better mixing Presence of secondary atomization, disruption of primary droplet Complete combustion | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| CaCO3 nano-fluids | 3 mg/l 5 mg/l | B100CaCO3 | Reduction of 4.08% specific fuel consumption reduction 3.9% increase of brake thermal efficiency 8.57% higher mechanical efficiency Reduction of NO | [ |
| Biodiesel |
| CuO | 80 ppm 40 μmol/L 80 μmol/L 120 μmol/L | B20CuO80 ppm | Significant increase in thermal efficiency 3–4% increase of brake thermal efficiency 25% reduction of CO Reduction of NO | [ |
| Biodiesel–castoroil–diesel–bioethanol | Vegetable oil– Vegetable oil–alcohol | CeO2-CNT | 25 ppm 50 ppm 100 ppm | – | Reduction of HC, CO, CO2, smoke and NO Increase of calorific value and brake thermal efficiency | [ |
| Biodiesel | FeCl3 | 20 μmol/l | BFeCl325 | Reduction of HC, CO, CO2, smoke and NO Increase of calorific value and brake thermal efficiency | [ |
Harvesting efficiency of various microalgae species with the addition of nano-particles
| Microalgae species | Nano-particles | Harvesting efficiency (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| Modified Chu 13, doses 380 mg/g | 90 | [ |
|
| Fe3O4 nano-particles functionally coated with polyethylenimine (PEI) | 97 | [ |
|
| Iron oxide and cationic polyacrylamide (CPAM), doses 120 mg/l | > 95 | [ |
|
| Modified Chu 13, doses 20 mg/g | 100 | [ |
|
| Iron oxide and CPAM, doses 15 mg/l | > 95 | [ |
| Marine | Magnetic Fe3O4 nano-particles, doses 99 mg/g | 95 | [ |
| Surface-functionalized iron-oxide nano-particles (SF-IONPs) with PDA (poly dimethylammonium chloride) | 99 | [ | |
| Chitosan/magnetic nano-particles (CS-MNPs) | 97 | [ | |
| Naked Fe3O4 magnetic particles | 90 | [ |
Applications of nano-additives for biodiesel-yield enhancements during microalgae to biofuel conversion, suitable conversion processes, and efficiencies
| Nano-additives | Conversion processes | Conversion efficiency | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calcium oxide nano-particles’ blends (CaO-NPs) | Catalytic transesterification | 91% | [ |
| Mesoporous silica nano-catalyst, Ti-loaded SBA-15 | Transesterification | 10 times higher yield than other catalysts 3 times higher than other effective nano-catalysts TS-1 and TiO2–S | [ |
| Niobia (N2O5) incorporated with SBA-15 | Esterification | Significant increase of biodiesel yield | [ |
| PAN nanofibre, Fe3O4 and nanoporous gold incorporation, silica nano-particles, ferric silica and magnetic nano-particles incorporation, polyacrylonitrile nano fibre transesterification process | Transesterification | Effective rise in biodiesel productivity | [ |
| KF/CaO–Fe3O4, Li(lithium)-doped CaO, Fe2O3–CaO, sulfate (SO4−) incorporated Zi (zirconium), sodium titanate and carbon-based nano-tubes and nano-particles | Transesterification | ≥ 95% | [ |