Literature DB >> 31138876

Nutritional composition of the food supply: a comparison of soft drinks and breakfast cereals between three European countries based on labels.

Karine Vin1, Julie Beziat2, Katrin Seper3, Alexandra Wolf3, Alexandra Sidor4, Razvan Chereches4, Jean Luc Volatier2, Céline Ménard2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
OBJECTIVES: Monitoring of processed products at the brand level was implemented in Austria, France and Romania on the basis of the Oqali methodology during the Joint Action on Nutrition and Physical Activity (JANPA) to compare the nutritional quality of the food offering. The objective of this paper is to present the results obtained during this study. SUBJECTS/
METHODS: Collected data were those available on product packaging. In total, 2155 soft drinks and 943 breakfast cereals were classified in a standardised list of product families and analysed in a harmonised way. For each product family, mean values for sugar, fat, saturated fat, salt and dietary fibres were compared between countries. Common products across countries were also studied.
RESULTS: For all the studied nutrients, significant differences were observed between countries, with a higher sugar content for Romania in regular carbonated and non-carbonated beverages containing fruits, regular lemonades and regular tonics and bitters (together with Austria for tonics), for France in fruit beverages with more than 50% fruit, and for Austria in low-sugar beverages containing tea. For France, higher nutrient contents were also observed for sugar in chocolate-flavoured cereals, filled cereals and cornflakes, and other plain cereals (at a similar level as Romania for cornflakes), and for saturated fats in honey/caramel cereals and crunchy mueslis. These differences were explained by a different food offering in the three countries, but also by differences in nutrient contents for common products. This study also showed high variability of the nutrient content within a product family, suggesting a real potential for product reformulation.
CONCLUSIONS: National tools, at the branded products level, are essential to monitor the nutritional quality of the food offering, and to follow up on processed food reformulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31138876     DOI: 10.1038/s41430-019-0442-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0954-3007            Impact factor:   4.016


  1 in total

1.  Potential for improvement of population diet through reformulation of commonly eaten foods.

Authors:  Joop van Raaij; Marieke Hendriksen; Hans Verhagen
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 4.022

  1 in total
  5 in total

1.  Caffeine Consumption in Switzerland: Results from the First National Nutrition Survey MenuCH.

Authors:  Christèle Rochat; Chin B Eap; Murielle Bochud; Angeline Chatelan
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-12-20       Impact factor: 5.717

2.  Food and Beverages Containing Algae and Derived Ingredients Launched in the Market from 2015 to 2019: A Front-of-Pack Labeling Perspective with a Special Focus on Spain.

Authors:  Fatma Boukid; Massimo Castellari
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-01-16

3.  Verifying the Use of Food Labeling Data for Compiling Branded Food Databases: A Case Study of Sugars in Beverages.

Authors:  Edvina Hafner; Živa Lavriša; Maša Hribar; Sanja Krušič; Anita Kušar; Katja Žmitek; Mihaela Skrt; Nataša Poklar Ulrih; Igor Pravst
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-02-03

4.  Evaluation of the Nutritional Quality of Breakfast Cereals Sold on the Italian Market: The Food Labelling of Italian Products (FLIP) Study.

Authors:  Donato Angelino; Alice Rosi; Margherita Dall'Asta; Nicoletta Pellegrini; Daniela Martini
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Evaluation of the Nutritional Quality of Processed Foods in Honduras: Comparison of Three Nutrient Profiles.

Authors:  Adriana Hernandez Santana; Sharyl Waleska Bodden Andrade; Dina Rojas Aleman; Jean Pierre Enríquez; Adriana Beatriz Di Iorio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.