Literature DB >> 31138726

An Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital Microvascular Invasion Scoring System in Predicting Prognosis of Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Microvascular Invasion After R0 Liver Resection: A Large-Scale, Multicenter Study.

Xiu-Ping Zhang1, Kang Wang1, Xu-Biao Wei1, Le-Qun Li2, Hui-Chuan Sun3, Tian-Fu Wen4, Zong-Tao Chai1, Zhen-Hua Chen1, Jie Shi1, Wei-Xing Guo1, Dong Xie5, Wen-Ming Cong6, Meng-Chao Wu1, Wan Yee Lau1,7, Shu-Qun Cheng8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Microvascular invasion (MVI) is associated with poor postoperative survival outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). An Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH) MVI scoring system was established to predict prognosis in patients with HCC with MVI after R0 liver resection (LR) and to supplement the most commonly used classification systems.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with HCC with MVI who underwent R0 LR as an initial therapy were included. The EHBH-MVI score was developed from a retrospective cohort from 2003 to 2009 to form the training cohort. The variables associated with overall survival (OS) on univariate analysis were subsequently investigated using the log-rank test, and the EHBH-MVI score was developed using the Cox regression model. It was validated using an internal prospective cohort from 2011 to 2013 as well as three independent external validation cohorts.
RESULTS: There were 1,033 patients in the training cohort; 322 patients in the prospective internal validation cohort; and 493, 282, and 149 patients in the three external validation cohorts, respectively. The score was developed using the following factors: α-fetoprotein level, tumor encapsulation, tumor diameter, hepatitis B e antigen positivity, hepatitis B virus DNA load, tumor number, and gastric fundal/esophageal varicosity. The score differentiated two groups of patients (≤4, >4 points) with distinct long-term prognoses outcomes (median OS, 55.8 vs. 19.6 months; p < .001). The predictive accuracy of the score was greater than the other four commonly used staging systems for HCC.
CONCLUSION: The EHBH-MVI scoring system was more accurate in predicting prognosis in patients with HCC with MVI after R0 LR than the other four commonly used staging systems. The score can be used to supplement these systems. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Microvascular invasion (MVI) is a major determinant of survival outcomes after curative liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Currently, there is no scoring system aiming to predict prognosis of patients with HCC and MVI after R0 liver resection (LR). Most of the widely used staging systems for HCC do not use MVI as an independent risk factor, and they cannot be used to predict the prognosis of patients with HCC and MVI after surgery. In this study, a new Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital (EHBH) MVI scoring system was established to predict prognosis of patients with HCC and MVI after R0 LR. Based on the results of this study, postoperative adjuvant therapy may be recommended for patients with HCC and MVI with an EHBH-MVI score >4. This score can be used to supplement the currently used HCC classifications to predict postoperative survival outcomes in patients with HCC and MVI. © AlphaMed Press 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hepatocellular carcinoma; Microvascular invasion; R0 liver resection; Scoring system

Year:  2019        PMID: 31138726      PMCID: PMC6975940          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  43 in total

Review 1.  Consensus statements on the prevention and management of hepatitis B and hepatitis C in the Asia-Pacific region. Core Working Party for Asia-Pacific Consensus on Hepatitis B and C.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.029

2.  EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 25.083

3.  Diagnosis, Staging, and Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: 2018 Practice Guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Authors:  Jorge A Marrero; Laura M Kulik; Claude B Sirlin; Andrew X Zhu; Richard S Finn; Michael M Abecassis; Lewis R Roberts; Julie K Heimbach
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Microvascular invasion is a better predictor of tumor recurrence and overall survival following surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma compared to the Milan criteria.

Authors:  Kheng-Choon Lim; Pierce Kah-Hoe Chow; John C Allen; Ghim-Song Chia; Miaoshan Lim; Peng-Chung Cheow; Alexander Y F Chung; London L P Ooi; Say-Beng Tan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Evidence-Based Diagnosis, Staging, and Treatment of Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Jordi Bruix; Maria Reig; Morris Sherman
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  A radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion risk in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jie Peng; Jing Zhang; Qifan Zhang; Yikai Xu; Jie Zhou; Li Liu
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2018 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

7.  Sex difference in recurrence and survival after liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter study.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Jun Han; Hao Xing; Zhen-Li Li; Myron E Schwartz; Ya-Hao Zhou; Ting-Hao Chen; Hong Wang; Wei-Min Gu; Wan Yee Lau; Han Wu; Meng-Chao Wu; Feng Shen; Tian Yang
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.982

8.  Transarterial chemoembolization versus surgery/radiofrequency ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma with or without microvascular invasion.

Authors:  Young-Joo Jin; Jin-Woo Lee; Oh Hyun Lee; Hyun Jung Chung; Young Soo Kim; Jung Il Lee; Soon Gu Cho; Yong Sun Jeon; Kun Young Lee; Seung-Ik Ahn; Woo Young Shin
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 4.029

9.  A system of classifying microvascular invasion to predict outcome after resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Sasan Roayaie; Iris N Blume; Swan N Thung; Maria Guido; Maria-Isabel Fiel; Spiros Hiotis; Daniel M Labow; Josep M Llovet; Myron E Schwartz
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 10.  Practice guidelines for the pathological diagnosis of primary liver cancer: 2015 update.

Authors:  Wen-Ming Cong; Hong Bu; Jie Chen; Hui Dong; Yu-Yao Zhu; Long-Hai Feng; Jun Chen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  14 in total

1.  Actual long-term survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion: a multicenter study from China.

Authors:  Zhen-Hua Chen; Xiu-Ping Zhang; Jin-Kai Feng; Le-Qun Li; Fan Zhang; Yi-Ren Hu; Cheng-Qian Zhong; Jie Shi; Wei-Xing Guo; Meng-Chao Wu; Wan Yee Lau; Shu-Qun Cheng
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 6.047

2.  A deep learning model with incorporation of microvascular invasion area as a factor in predicting prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after R0 hepatectomy.

Authors:  Kang Wang; Yanjun Xiang; Jiangpeng Yan; Yuyao Zhu; Hanbo Chen; Jianhua Yao; Shuqun Cheng; Hongming Yu; Yuqiang Cheng; Xiu Li; Wei Dong; Yan Ji; Jingjing Li; Dong Xie; Wan Yee Lau
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 9.029

3.  Efficacy of Postoperative Adjuvant Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients With Microscopic Portal Vein Invasion.

Authors:  Yiwen Qiu; Yi Yang; Tao Wang; Shu Shen; Wentao Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Microscopic Portal Vein Invasion in Relation to Tumor Focality and Dimension in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian I Carr; Vito Guerra; Rossella Donghia; Volkan Ince; Sami Akbulut; Veysel Ersan; Sertac Usta; Burak Isik; Emine Samdanci; Sezai Yilmaz
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: which preoperative clinical data and conventional MRI characteristics have value for the prediction of microvascular invasion and clinical significance?

Authors:  Xiaolong Wang; Wentao Wang; Xijuan Ma; Xin Lu; Shaodong Li; Mengsu Zeng; Kai Xu; Chun Yang
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Appraisal of the United Network for Organ Sharing Modified TNM Staging.

Authors:  Abu Bakar Hafeez Bhatti; Anum Waheed; Nasir Ayub Khan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2021-01-21

7.  Prognostic Value of Microvascular Invasion in Eight Existing Staging Systems for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Bi-Centeric Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Yan-Jun Xiang; Kang Wang; Yi-Tao Zheng; Hong-Ming Yu; Yu-Qiang Cheng; Wei-Jun Wang; Yun-Feng Shan; Shu-Qun Cheng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Establishment and Evaluation of a Predictive Model for Early Postoperative Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Microvascular Invasion.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Changcheng Tao; Fan Wu; Tana Siqin; Jianxiong Wu; Weiqi Rong
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-06-03

9.  Prognostic value of the ALBI grade among patients with single hepatocellular carcinoma without macrovascular invasion.

Authors:  Wenhao Chen; Zijian Zhang; Xianrui Fang; Li Xiong; Yu Wen; Jiangjiao Zhou; Fanhua Kong; Heng Zou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  Establishment, validation and evaluation of predictive model for early relapse after R0 resection in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with microvascular invasion.

Authors:  Kai Zhang; Changcheng Tao; Tana Siqin; Jianxiong Wu; Weiqi Rong
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.