Literature DB >> 31138679

Spindle checkpoint silencing at kinetochores with submaximal microtubule occupancy.

Banafsheh Etemad1, Abel Vertesy1, Timo E F Kuijt1, Carlos Sacristan1, Alexander van Oudenaarden1, Geert J P L Kops2.   

Abstract

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ensures proper chromosome segregation by monitoring kinetochore-microtubule interactions. SAC proteins are shed from kinetochores once stable attachments are achieved. Human kinetochores consist of hundreds of SAC protein recruitment modules and bind up to 20 microtubules, raising the question of how the SAC responds to intermediate attachment states. We show that one protein module ('RZZS-MAD1-MAD2') of the SAC is removed from kinetochores at low microtubule occupancy and remains absent at higher occupancies, while another module ('BUB1-BUBR1') is retained at substantial levels irrespective of attachment states. These behaviours reflect different silencing mechanisms: while BUB1 displacement is almost fully dependent on MPS1 inactivation, MAD1 (also known as MAD1L1) displacement is not. Artificially tuning the affinity of kinetochores for microtubules further shows that ∼50% occupancy is sufficient to shed MAD2 and silence the SAC. Kinetochores thus respond as a single unit to shut down SAC signalling at submaximal occupancy states, but retain one SAC module. This may ensure continued SAC silencing on kinetochores with fluctuating occupancy states while maintaining the ability for fast SAC re-activation.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosome segregation; Kinetochore; Microtubules; Mitosis; Spindle assembly checkpoint

Year:  2019        PMID: 31138679     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.231589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  7 in total

1.  Ensemble-Level Organization of Human Kinetochores and Evidence for Distinct Tension and Attachment Sensors.

Authors:  Emanuele Roscioli; Tsvetelina E Germanova; Christopher A Smith; Peter A Embacher; Muriel Erent; Amelia I Thompson; Nigel J Burroughs; Andrew D McAinsh
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 2.  Hec1/Ndc80 Tail Domain Function at the Kinetochore-Microtubule Interface.

Authors:  Robert T Wimbish; Jennifer G DeLuca
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-02-26

Review 3.  The Role of Mitotic Kinases and the RZZ Complex in Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachments: Doing the Right Link.

Authors:  João Barbosa; Claudio E Sunkel; Carlos Conde
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-01-28

4.  Cyclin B1 scaffolds MAD1 at the kinetochore corona to activate the mitotic checkpoint.

Authors:  Lindsey A Allan; Magda Camacho Reis; Giuseppe Ciossani; Pim J Huis In 't Veld; Sabine Wohlgemuth; Geert Jpl Kops; Andrea Musacchio; Adrian T Saurin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 11.598

5.  CENP-F stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule attachments and limits dynein stripping of corona cargoes.

Authors:  Philip Auckland; Emanuele Roscioli; Helena Louise Elvidge Coker; Andrew D McAinsh
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 10.539

6.  Mammalian kinetochores count attached microtubules in a sensitive and switch-like manner.

Authors:  Jonathan Kuhn; Sophie Dumont
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 7.  Spindle assembly checkpoint activation and silencing at kinetochores.

Authors:  Pablo Lara-Gonzalez; Jonathon Pines; Arshad Desai
Journal:  Semin Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 7.727

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.