Literature DB >> 31138494

Use of progestins to inhibit spontaneous ovulation during ovarian stimulation: the beginning of a new era?

Antonio La Marca1, Martina Capuzzo2.   

Abstract

Advances in oocyte and embryo cryopreservation for assisted reproduction prompted new approaches to ovarian stimulation. Attention has been paid to progesterone and its derivatives to block the LH surge, as oocyte vitrification removes possible harmful effects of progestins on endometrial receptivity. This review summarizes the current status of progestin use to inhibit ovulation during ovarian stimulation compared with conventional ovarian stimulation. Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation is shown to effectively inhibit spontaneous ovulation, without affecting the number of retrieved oocytes and embryo quality. Reproductive outcomes from ovarian stimulation with progestins appear similar to those from conventional ovarian stimulation, although large trials are needed to confirm this. Use of progestins allows better control of LH concentrations, lower costs and easier (oral) administration. Therefore, progestin-primed ovarian stimulation could be the first choice for ovarian stimulation in fertility preservation, oocyte donation and preimplantation genetic testing cycles. So-called 'non-conventional' ovarian stimulation protocols (luteal and random-start, double ovarian stimulation), which always require oocyte or embryo cryopreservation, may also use progestins to inhibit the endogenous LH surge. Since the 'freeze-all' strategy with delayed transfer is mandatory, high responders undergoing IVF could benefit more from this approach. Economic advantage remains to be demonstrated, as do pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
Copyright © 2019 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues; Ovarian stimulation; Ovulation inhibition; Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation; Progestins

Year:  2019        PMID: 31138494     DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.03.212

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online        ISSN: 1472-6483            Impact factor:   3.828


  8 in total

1.  How effective are the non-conventional ovarian stimulation protocols in ART? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Demian Glujovsky; Romina Pesce; Mariana Miguens; Carlos E Sueldo; Karinna Lattes; Agustín Ciapponi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Medroxyprogesterone acetate used in ovarian stimulation is associated with reduced mature oocyte retrieval and blastocyst development: a matched cohort study of 825 freeze-all IVF cycles.

Authors:  Kemal Ozgur; Murat Berkkanoglu; Hasan Bulut; Levent Donmez; Kevin Coetzee
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Impact of progestin ovarian stimulation on newborn outcomes: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Irene Zolfaroli; Gemma Arribas Ferriol; Juan-José Hidalgo Mora; Antonio Cano
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Progestin primed ovarian stimulation using corifollitropin alfa in PCOS women effectively prevents LH surge and reduces injection burden compared to GnRH antagonist protocol.

Authors:  Ting-Chi Huang; Mei-Zen Huang; Kok-Min Seow; Ih-Jane Yang; Song-Po Pan; Mei-Jou Chen; Jiann-Loung Hwang; Shee-Uan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation Versus Mild Stimulation Protocol in Advanced Age Women With Diminished Ovarian Reserve Undergoing Their First In Vitro Fertilization Cycle: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Tu; Bingbing You; Miaomiao Jing; Chenxi Lin; Runju Zhang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 5.555

6.  Evaluation of pregnancy outcomes using medroxyprogesterone acetate versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in ovarian stimulation: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ekika Singh; Christophe Blockeel; Madhulika Singh; Rishi Gupta; Sandesh Kamdi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2022-07-06

7.  Progestin-Primed Ovarian Stimulation is a non-inferior alternative to the GnRH Antagonist Protocol in patients undergoing assisted reproductive techniques: a retrospective study.

Authors:  João Pedro Junqueira Caetano; Luciana Campomizzi Calazans; Leci Veiga Caetano Amorim; Leonardo Matheus Ribeiro Pereira; Erica Becker Sousa Xavier; Ana Luisa Menezes Campos; Bruna Barbosa Coimbra; Ricardo Mello Marinho
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2022-01-17

8.  Comparison of Cumulative Live Birth Rates Between GnRH-A and PPOS in Low-Prognosis Patients According to POSEIDON Criteria: A Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shaodi Zhang; Yisha Yin; Qiuyuan Li; Cuilian Zhang
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.555

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.