Literature DB >> 31138442

Comparison between different epidural analgesia modalities for labor.

I P Rodríguez González1, E Espinosa Domínguez2, C Quesada García2, Á Rodríguez Chimeno2, R Borges3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In recent years new modalities of epidural analgesia maintenance (EA) have been introduced.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare different modalities of EA maintenance for childbirth relating the time of expulsive and dilatation, motor blockade and delivery instrumentation (caesarean section, sucker, forceps, eutocic delivery or non-instrumented delivery).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients admitted for labor in the University Hospital Nuestra Señora de Candelaria between January 2013 and December 2015 were included. Independent modalities of EA, continuous infusion (CI), continuous infusion plus analgesia patient controlled epidural analgesia were determined as independent variables (CI+PCEA) and intermittent programmed epidural boluses plus patient controlled epidural analgesia (PIEB+PCEA).
RESULTS: There are no differences in expulsive time or dilation. There is a difference in the type of instrumentation, caesarean section, sucker, forceps, eutocic delivery or non-instrumented delivery (P>.05), with the percentage of eutocic deliveries in PIEB+PCEA of 66 versus 60 in CI and 65 in CI+PCEA. The percentage of caesarean sections was 23 in CI, in CI+PCEA and PIEB+PCEA of 17. CI increases by 27% the possibility of instrumented deliveries respect to PIEB+PCEA, there is no difference between CI+PCEA and PIEB+PCEA. The motor blockade at 60 and 90minutes reaches lower values with PIEB+PCEA with an average of 0 and a range of 0-1, compared to CI+PCEA 0 (0-4). Satisfaction with CI+PCEA ranges from 2-10 and with PIEB+PCEA 0-10.
CONCLUSION: It is possible to say that PIEB+PCEA is associated with higher frequency of non-instrumented deliveries. The possibility of instrumented deliveries increases with CI versus PIEB+PCEA. There is less motor block with PIEB+PCEA than with CI+PCEA. There are no differences in time of dilatation, expulsion, or patient satisfaction.
Copyright © 2019 Sociedad Española de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Terapéutica del Dolor. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesia controlada por la paciente; Analgesia epidural; Bolos intermitentes; Epidural analgesia; Epidural analgesia manteinance modalities; Intermittent epidural bolus; Modalidades de mantenimiento de analgesia epidural; Patient controlled epidural analgesia

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31138442     DOI: 10.1016/j.redar.2019.03.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed)        ISSN: 2341-1929


  3 in total

1.  Does epidural anesthesia influence pelvic floor muscle endurance and strength and the prevalence of urinary incontinence 6 weeks postpartum?

Authors:  Qing Wang; Xiaojie Yu; Xiuli Sun; Jianliu Wang
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Optimization of programmed intermittent epidural bolus volume for different concentrations of ropivacaine in labor analgesia: a biased coin up-and-down sequential allocation trial.

Authors:  Xin Ran; Shuzhi Zhou; Kailan Cao; Peng He
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 3.105

3.  Programmed intermittent epidural bolus in parturients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Xian-Xue Wang; Xiao-Lan Zhang; Zhao-Xia Zhang; Zi-Qin Xin; Hua-Jing Guo; Hai-Yan Liu; Jing Xiao; Yun-Lin Zhang; Shu-Zhen Yuan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 1.889

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.