Eun Kyeong Kang1,2, Melissa S Xanthopoulos1, Ji Young Kim1,3, Casandra Arevalo1, Justine Shults1, Suzanne E Beck1,4, Carole L Marcus1,4, Ignacio E Tapia1,4. 1. Sleep Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Dongguk University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. 3. Center for Human Phenomic Science, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) differs in children with developmental disabilities (DD) compared to typically developing (TD) children. METHODS: PAP adherence of 240 children initiated on PAP for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was retrospectively analyzed. Adherence between groups, expressed as percentage of nights used and hours of usage on nights used at 3 and 6 months, was compared. Predictive factors of adherence were studied using a median regression model. RESULTS: A total of 103 children with DD (median [interquartile range] age = 7.9 [3.2-13.1] years) and 137 TD (11.0 [5.5-16.1], P = .005) children were included. Percentage of nights used was significantly higher in children with DD at 3 (DD = 86.7 [33.9-97.9], TD = 62.9 [30.8-87.8] P = .01) and 6 months (DD = 90.0 [53.3-100], TD = 70.7 [29.2-90.8], P = .003). Hours of usage on nights used at 3 and 6 months were similar between groups (DD = 5.0 [1.4-7.9], TD = 4.6 [1.9-7.2], P = .715; DD = 6.4 [1.8-8.3], TD = 5.7 [2.5-7.3], P = .345, respectively). This adherence measure improved over time in both groups (DD, P = .007; TD, P = .005). At 6 months, higher median neighborhood income and titration at or before 6 months were significantly predictive for percentage of nights used; higher PAP pressure was significantly predictive for hours of usage in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Children with DD had better PAP adherence expressed as percentage of nights used than TD children. Hours of usage on nights used at 3 and 6 months were similar between groups and improved over time. Higher income and titration at or before 6 months were predictive of adherence in all children. These findings indicate that children with DD can successfully wear PAP.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether adherence to positive airway pressure (PAP) differs in children with developmental disabilities (DD) compared to typically developing (TD) children. METHODS: PAP adherence of 240 children initiated on PAP for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) was retrospectively analyzed. Adherence between groups, expressed as percentage of nights used and hours of usage on nights used at 3 and 6 months, was compared. Predictive factors of adherence were studied using a median regression model. RESULTS: A total of 103 children with DD (median [interquartile range] age = 7.9 [3.2-13.1] years) and 137 TD (11.0 [5.5-16.1], P = .005) children were included. Percentage of nights used was significantly higher in children with DD at 3 (DD = 86.7 [33.9-97.9], TD = 62.9 [30.8-87.8] P = .01) and 6 months (DD = 90.0 [53.3-100], TD = 70.7 [29.2-90.8], P = .003). Hours of usage on nights used at 3 and 6 months were similar between groups (DD = 5.0 [1.4-7.9], TD = 4.6 [1.9-7.2], P = .715; DD = 6.4 [1.8-8.3], TD = 5.7 [2.5-7.3], P = .345, respectively). This adherence measure improved over time in both groups (DD, P = .007; TD, P = .005). At 6 months, higher median neighborhood income and titration at or before 6 months were significantly predictive for percentage of nights used; higher PAP pressure was significantly predictive for hours of usage in both groups. CONCLUSIONS:Children with DD had better PAP adherence expressed as percentage of nights used than TD children. Hours of usage on nights used at 3 and 6 months were similar between groups and improved over time. Higher income and titration at or before 6 months were predictive of adherence in all children. These findings indicate that children with DD can successfully wear PAP.
Authors: Amy M Sawyer; Nalaka S Gooneratne; Carole L Marcus; Dafna Ofer; Kathy C Richards; Terri E Weaver Journal: Sleep Med Rev Date: 2011-06-08 Impact factor: 11.609
Authors: Carole L Marcus; Suzanne E Beck; Joel Traylor; Mary Anne Cornaglia; Lisa J Meltzer; Natalie DiFeo; Laurie R Karamessinis; John Samuel; Jennifer Falvo; Michelle DiMaria; Paul R Gallagher; Heidi Beris; Mary Kate Menello Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2012-02-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Carole L Marcus; Jerilynn Radcliffe; Sofia Konstantinopoulou; Suzanne E Beck; Mary Anne Cornaglia; Joel Traylor; Natalie DiFeo; Laurie R Karamessinis; Paul R Gallagher; Lisa J Meltzer Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Rohit Budhiraja; Sairam Parthasarathy; Christopher L Drake; Thomas Roth; Imran Sharief; Pooja Budhiraja; Victoria Saunders; David W Hudgel Journal: Sleep Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Sherri L Katz; Valerie G Kirk; Joanna E MacLean; Glenda N Bendiak; Mary-Ann Harrison; Nicholas Barrowman; Lynda Hoey; Linda Horwood; Stasia Hadjiyannakis; Laurent Legault; Bethany J Foster; Evelyn Constantin Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2020-02-07 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Ozge Yendur; Lance Feld; Monica Miranda-Schaeubinger; Melissa S Xanthopoulos; Suzanne E Beck; Christopher M Cielo; Emma J Escobar; Ignacio E Tapia Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2022-04-01 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Miriam R Weiss; Michelle L Allen; Jeremy S Landeo-Gutierrez; Jenny P Lew; Julia K Aziz; Sylvan S Mintz; Claire M Lawlor; Benjamin J Becerra; Diego A Preciado; Gustavo Nino Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2021-05-01 Impact factor: 4.062