| Literature DB >> 31138127 |
Wei-Jia Lu1,2, Fan-Xiang Gao1,2,3, Yang Wang1,2, Qi-Ya Zhang1,2, Zhi Li1, Xiao-Juan Zhang1, Li Zhou4,5, Jian-Fang Gui6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accompanied with rapid growth and high density aquaculture, gibel carp has been seriously threatened by Carassius auratus herpesvirus (CaHV) since 2012. In previous study, distinct CaHV resistances and immune responses were revealed in the diseased individuals of three gibel carp gynogenetic clones (A+, F and H). However, little is known about the gene expression changes in the survivors after CaHV challenge, particularly their differences of innate and adaptive immune system between susceptible clone and resistant clone.Entities:
Keywords: Gibel carp; Herpesvirus; IFN; Immunoglobulin; Myosin; Survivors; Transcriptome
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31138127 PMCID: PMC6540555 DOI: 10.1186/s12864-019-5777-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Genomics ISSN: 1471-2164 Impact factor: 3.969
Fig. 1CaHV detection and quantification in the control individuals (c), diseased individuals with sub-clinical symptoms (d) or survivors (s) from three gynogenetic gibel carp clones (A+, F and H). a Electrophoretogram of the PCR amplified products of five CaHV genes (hel, cap, ung, dut and tmk). β-actin was selected as reference gene. Gene symbols and the sizes of amplified products are indicated by the left and right side of the figure, respectively. b CaHV viral loads. Data are shown as means ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3) representing CaHV copy number per ng DNA. The asterisk indicates the significant difference between resistant clone and susceptible clone (p < 0.05)
Fig. 2GO classification of DEUs from s-H vs c-H, s-F vs c-F and s-A+ vs c-A+, respectively. GO terms grouped into three main categories: biological process, cellular component and molecular function. The ID and percentage of each GO term are indicated in the pie chart
Fig. 3KEGG pathway enrichment analysis. a-c Functional classification of DEUs in KEGG term “organismal systems” from s-H vs c-H (a), s-F vs c-F (b) and s-A+ vs c-A+ (c). The ID and percentage of each KEGG term are indicated in the pie chart. d-i Top 30 enriched KEGG pathways of specifically up- or down-regulated DEUs from s-H vs c-H, s-F vs c-F and s-A+ vs c-A+, respectively. The x-axis indicates the rich factor of each pathway and y-axis shows pathway. The color and size of dot indicates Q value and the number of DEUs assigned to the corresponding pathway respectively
Fig. 4Commonly up-regulated DEUs from s-H vs c-H, s-F vs c-F and s-A+ vs c-A+. a Venn diagram of up- or down-regulated DEUs from s-A+ vs c-A+ (green circle), s-F vs c-F (blue circle) and s-H vs c-H (red circle). b The qPCR analyses of eight genes (sptb, urod, cpox, fech, blvrb, hba, mfrn1 and fam210b) related to circulatory system in head kidney of gibel carp clone A+, F and H. eef1a1l1 was used as the normalizer. Gene expression levels are relative to that of clone A+ control individuals. Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). Asterisks indicate the significant differences between control and survivor (*: p < 0.05 and **: p < 0.05). c Heatmap of commonly up-regulated DEUs among s-H vs c-H, s-F vs c-F and s-A+ vs c-A+. Hierarchical clustering is calculated by log2 fold change values and the main clusters were lined out on the right
Category of commonly up-regulated DEUs annotated in the circulatory system from s-H vs c-H, s-F vs c-F and s-A+ vs c-A+
| Gene Name | Gene Abbrev-iation | Function annotation | Unigene ID |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Heme biosynthesis and metabolism | CL55.Contig1, CL55.Contig2, CL55.Contig3 |
|
|
| CL8987.Contig5, CL8987.Contig6, Unigene35721 | |
|
|
| CL8862.Contig4, CL8862.Contig1, CL8862.Contig7, CL8862.Contig6, CL8862.Contig3, CL8862.Contig2 | |
|
|
| CL158.Contig2, CL158.Contig1, CL158.Contig3 | |
|
|
| CL3455.Contig8 | |
|
|
| CL8222.Contig4, CL8222.Contig2, CL8222.Contig5 | |
|
|
| Oxygen and ion transport | CL5869.Contig1, CL5869.Contig2, CL5869.Contig6 |
|
|
| Unigene31300, Unigene86068, Unigene6944, Unigene22310, | |
|
|
| CL14300.Contig2, CL14300.Contig4, CL14300.Contig5, Unigene38629, CL14300.Contig1 | |
|
|
| CL45.Contig4, CL45.Contig1 | |
|
|
| CL6154.Contig1, CL6154.Contig4, CL6154.Contig3 | |
|
|
| Unigene28427 | |
|
|
| Proliferation and differentiation of haemocytes | CL5210.Contig1, CL5210.Contig4, CL5210.Contig2, CL5210.Contig5, CL5210.Contig3 |
|
|
| CL4920.Contig3, CL4920.Contig1 | |
|
|
| CL6436.Contig3, | |
|
|
| Erythrocyte membrane structure | Unigene12266 |
|
|
| Unigene1305, CL16738.Contig5 |
Category of commonly up-regulated DEUs annotated in the immune system from s-H vs c-H, s-F vs c-F and s-A+ vs c-A+
| Gene Name | Gene Abbrev-iation | Category | Unigene ID |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| Innate immunity | CL5938.Contig2, CL5938.Contig1 |
|
|
| Unigene19789 | |
|
|
| CL1686.Contig3, CL1686.Contig18, CL1686.Contig14 | |
|
|
| CL1331.Contig11, CL1331.Contig10 | |
|
|
| Adaptive immunity | Unigene33364, Unigene73086 |
|
|
| CL3993.Contig1 | |
|
|
| CL16106.Contig2 | |
|
|
| Unigene17417, Unigene38807, | |
|
|
| CL4981.Contig5, CL4981.Contig1 | |
|
|
| CL14567.Contig1 | |
|
|
| CL14135.Contig1 | |
|
|
| CL10390.Contig2 | |
|
|
| Unigene23119 |
Number of specifically up/down-regulated DEUs annotated as IFN system genes, immunoglobulins or myosins from s-H vs c-H, s-F vs c-F and s-A+ vs c-A+
| Category | Gene Abbrev-iation | Number of up-regulated DEUs | Number of down-regulated DEUs | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s-H vs c-H | s-F vs c-F | s-A+ vs c-A+ | s-H vs c-H | s-F vs c-F | s-A+ vs c-A+ | |||
| IFN system | host pattern recognition receptors |
| 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
|
| 4 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 3 | ||
|
| 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| PRR-mediated IFN signal pathway |
| 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| IFN regulatory factor |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
|
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| interferon- induced proteins or IFN antiviral 7effectors |
| 4 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | |
|
| 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
|
| 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | ||
|
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 4 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
|
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| interferon |
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total number | 58 | 50 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 14 | ||
| Immunoglobulin | immunoglobulin heavy chain |
| 15 | 0 | 7 | 0 | 40 | 3 |
|
| 3 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 11 | 3 | ||
|
| 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| immunoglobulin light chain |
| 13 | 0 | 19 | 4 | 66 | 4 | |
|
| 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ||
| immunoglobulin receptor-like |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| immunoglobulin superfamily |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| Total number | 43 | 1 | 33 | 5 | 118 | 13 | ||
| myosin superfamily | myosin heavy chain |
| 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | ||
|
| 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| myosin light chain |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
|
| 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | ||
|
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Total number | 3 | 6 | 17 | 3 | 12 | 1 | ||
Fig. 5Verification of DEUs by qPCR. The qPCR analyses of nine IFN system genes (irf3, irf7, lgp2, stat2, mx1, mx3, viperin, ifi44, and ifi56) (a-i) and three immunoglobulins (IgLλ, IgZ and IgM) (j-l) in head kidney of gibel carp clone A+, F and H. eef1a1l1 was used as the normalizer. Gene expression levels are relative to those of clone H control individuals. Each bar represents mean ± standard deviation (SD) (n = 3). Asterisks indicate the significant differences between control and survivor (*: p < 0.05 and **: p < 0.05)
Fig. 6WGCNA identification of gene modules correlated with resistance or susceptibility traits of gibel carp. a The clustering dendrogram of DEUs. Branches represent the co-expressed genes in modules, shown in the colorbar below the dendrogram. b Heatmap of correlations between modules and viral loads. Each cell contains the corresponding correlation and p-value. Positive or negative correlations are denoted in red or green respectively