| Literature DB >> 31137897 |
Tan Jin Yeong1, Ker Pin Jern2, Lau Kuen Yao3, M A Hannan4, Shirley Tang Gee Hoon5.
Abstract
The agricultural industry has made a tremendous contribution to the foundations of civilization. Basic essentials such as food, beverages, clothes and domestic materials are enriched by the agricultural industry. However, the traditional method in agriculture cultivation is labor-intensive and inadequate to meet the accelerating nature of human demands. This scenario raises the need to explore state-of-the-art crop cultivation and harvesting technologies. In this regard, optics and photonics technologies have proven to be effective solutions. This paper aims to present a comprehensive review of three photonic techniques, namely imaging, spectroscopy and spectral imaging, in a comparative manner for agriculture applications. Essentially, the spectral imaging technique is a robust solution which combines the benefits of both imaging and spectroscopy but faces the risk of underutilization. This review also comprehends the practicality of all three techniques by presenting existing examples in agricultural applications. Furthermore, the potential of these techniques is reviewed and critiqued by looking into agricultural activities involving palm oil, rubber, and agro-food crops. All the possible issues and challenges in implementing the photonic techniques in agriculture are given prominence with a few selective recommendations. The highlighted insights in this review will hopefully lead to an increased effort in the development of photonics applications for the future agricultural industry.Entities:
Keywords: agriculture; imaging; photonics; spectral imaging; spectroscopy
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31137897 PMCID: PMC6571790 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24102025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Model of Beer-Lambert’s Law [18].
Figure 2Jablonski diagram [17]. Reproduced with permission from A. Nawrocka, Advances in Agrophysical Research, Published by IntechOpen, 2013.
Figure 3Vibrations in diatomic molecules [17]. Reproduced with permission from A. Nawrocka, Advances in Agrophysical Research, Published by IntechOpen, 2013.
Examples of NIR absorption bands [29].
| Wavelength (nm) | Wavenumber (cm−1) | Assignment |
|---|---|---|
| Water | ||
| 1454 | 6878 | 1st overtone O–H stretching |
| 1932 | 5176 | O–H combination |
| Proteins | ||
| 1208 | 8278 | 2nd overtone C–H stretching |
| 1465 | 6826 | 1st overtone N–H and O–H stretching |
| 1734 | 5767 | 1st overtone C–H stretching |
| 1932 | 5176 | N–H combination and O–H stretching |
| 2302 | 4344 | C–H stretching combination |
| Oil | ||
| 1210 | 8264 | 2nd overtone C–H stretching |
| 1406 | 7112 | 1st overtone N–H and O–H stretching |
| 1718 | 5821 | 1st overtone C–H stretching |
| 2114 | 4730 | N–H combination and O–H stretching |
| 2308 | 4333 | C–H stretching combination |
| Starch | ||
| 1204 | 8306 | 2nd overtone C–H stretching |
| 1464 | 6831 | 1st overtone N–H and O–H stretching |
| 1932 | 5176 | N–H combination and O–H stretching |
| 2290 | 4367 | C–H stretching combination |
Examples of MIR absorption bands [27].
| Wavelength (nm) | Wavenumber (cm−1) | Assignment |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 2.778–3.125 | 3200–3600 | O–H stretching |
| 6.061 | 1650 | H–OH stretching |
|
| ||
| 5.917–6.250 | 1600–1690 | Amide I (C=O stretching) |
| 6.349–6.757 | 1480–1575 | Amide II (C–N stretching and N–H bending) |
| 7.692–8.130 | 1230–1300 | Amide III (C–N stretching and N–H bending) |
|
| ||
| 3.333–3.571 | 2800–3000 | C–H stretching |
| 5.731–5.797 | 1725–1745 | C=O stretching |
| 10.309 | 970 | C=C–H bending |
|
| ||
| 3.333–3.571 | 2800–3000 | C–H stretching |
| 7.143–12.500 | 800–1400 | Skeletal stretching and bending |
Figure 4Light scattering schemes [17]. Reproduced with permission from A. Nawrocka, Advances in Agrophysical Research, Published by IntechOpen, 2013.
Examples of Raman bands [30].
| Wavelength (nm) | Wavenumber (cm−1) | Assignment |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| 2.778–3.125 | 3200–3600 | O–H stretching |
|
| ||
| 19.608 | 510 | S–S stretching |
| 14.925–15.873 | 630–670 | C–S stretching |
| 5.882–6.250 | 1600–1700 | Amide I (C=O stretching and N–H bending) |
| 8.032–8.097 | 1235–1245 | Amide III (C–N stretching and N–H bending) |
| 3.876–3.922 | 2550–2580 | S–H stretching |
| 3.333–3.571 | 2800–3000 | C–H stretching |
|
| ||
| 6.940 | 1441 | CH2 bending |
| 6.863 | 1457 | CH3–CH2 bending |
| 6.039 | 1656 | C=C stretching |
| 3.378–3.503 | 2855–2960 | C–H stretching |
| Carbohydrates | ||
| 11.962 | 836 | C–C stretching |
| 9.398 | 1064 | C–O stretching |
| 3.434 | 2912 | C–H stretching |
| 2.898 | 3451 | O–H stretching |
Figure 5Methods of spectral image acquisitions with (a) point scan, (b) line scan, and (c) area scan [35]. Reproduced with permission from J. Qin, Journal of Food Engineering, Published by Elsevier, 2013.
Figure 6Sensing modes in spectral imaging; (a) reflectance, (b) transmittance, and (c) Interactance [36]. Reproduced with permission from D. Wu, Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, Published by Elsevier, 2013.
Comparison of optics and photonics techniques in agriculture [36].
| Characteristics | Imaging | Spectroscopy | Spectral Imaging |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spectral information | × | ✓ | ✓ |
| Spatial information | ✓ | × | ✓ |
| Multi-constituent information | × | ✓ | ✓ |
| Sensitivity to small-sized objects | ✓ | × | ✓ |
| Flexibility of spectral extraction | × | × | ✓ |
| Generation of quality-attribute distribution | × | × | ✓ |
Applications of imaging technique in agriculture.
| Class | Product | Application | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fruit | Apple | Bruise detection (thermal) | [ |
| Apple | Maturity evaluation (thermal) | [ | |
| Apple | Yield estimation (thermal) | [ | |
| Apple | Scab disease detection (thermal) | [ | |
| Green apple | Acquisition of segmented fruit region | [ | |
| Green apple and orange | Yield estimation | [ | |
| Orange | Texture analysis | [ | |
| Orange | Bruise detection (thermal) | [ | |
| Citrus | Water stress evaluation (thermal) | [ | |
| Pear | Maturity evaluation (thermal) | [ | |
| Banana | Maturity evaluation | [ | |
| Banana | Maturity evaluation | [ | |
| Persimmon | Maturity evaluation (thermal) | [ | |
| Passion fruit | Mass and volume estimation | [ | |
| Blueberry | Bruise detection | [ | |
| Grapevine | Pathogen detection (thermal) | [ | |
| Tomato | Fruit detection | [ | |
| Tomato | Bruise detection and maturity evaluation | [ | |
| Tomato | Bruise detection (thermal) | [ | |
| Tomato | Maturity evaluation (thermal) | [ | |
| Tomato | Clustered fruit detection | [ | |
| Sweet peppers | Peduncle detection | [ | |
| Onion | Post-harvest quality assessment (thermal) | [ | |
| Lettuce | Segmentation of vegetable | [ | |
| Cucumber | Downy mildew disease detection (thermal) | [ | |
| Grain | Rice leaf | Nitrogen content detection | [ |
| Wheat | Yield estimation (thermal) | [ | |
| Corn | Water stress evaluation (thermal) | [ | |
| Macadamia nuts | Yield estimation | [ | |
| Soybean | Identification of foliar disease | [ | |
| Soybean | Identification of leaf disease | [ | |
| Maize | Yield estimation (thermal) | [ | |
| Maize | Identification of leaf disease | [ | |
| Maize | Cultivar identification | [ | |
| Commercial | Cotton | Water stress evaluation (thermal) | [ |
| Silkworm | Gender identification | [ | |
| Farm and Plantation | Seed | Viability evaluation (thermal) | [ |
| Wheat field | Estimation of nutrient content | [ | |
| Cauliflower plantation | Weed detection | [ | |
| Asparagus plantation | Crop harvest robot vision | [ | |
| Sugar beet and rape plantation | Agriculture robot vision | [ | |
| Grapevines | Estimation of intra-parcel grape quantities | [ | |
| Cow farm | Behavioural studies | [ | |
| Goat and sheep farm | Animal species identification | [ | |
| Fish aquarium | Behavioural studies | [ | |
| Baby shrimp farm | Chlorine level detection | [ | |
| Orchid farm | Disease and pest detection | [ | |
| Surface and ground water | Chemical content detection | [ |
Applications of spectroscopy technique in agriculture.
| Class | Product | Application | Method | Wavelength (nm) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fruit | Apple | Pigment content change during ripening | UV-VIS-NIR | 400–1000 | [ |
| Apple | Soluble solid content detection | VIS-NIR | 500–1100, | [ | |
| Apple | Pesticide residue detection | Raman | 5–18 µm | [ | |
| Pear | Brown core and soluble solid content detection | UV-VIS-NIR | 200–1100 | [ | |
| Mango | Maturity evaluation | NIR | 1200–2200 | [ | |
| Peach | Peach variety identification | NIR | 833–2500 | [ | |
| Wax jambu | Quality inspection | NIR | 1000–2400 | [ | |
| Grape leaf | Water content estimation | UV-VIS-NIR | 350–2500 | [ | |
| Vegetable | Carrot | Carotenoid, fructose, glucose, sucrose and sugar content detection | NIR | 1108–2490 | [ |
| Potato | Bruise detection | UV-VIS-NIR | 250–1750 | [ | |
| Potato | Protein, fructose, glucose, starch and sucrose content detection | NIR | 1100–2500 | [ | |
| Onion | Soluble solid content detection | VIS-NIR | 500–1200 | [ | |
| Oilseed rape leaf | Aspartic acid content detection | NIR | 1100–2500 | [ | |
| Sugar beet seeds | Quality control | Time-domain spectroscopy | 250–350 GHz | [ | |
| Mushroom | Moisture content detection | VIS-NIR | 600–2200 | [ | |
| Grain | Corn seed | Viability evaluation | NIR | 1000–2500 | [ |
| Almond | Internal defect detection | VIS-NIR | 700–1400 | [ | |
| Maize | Identification of transgenic ingredients | THz spectral | 0–4.5 THz | [ | |
| Rice, maize and peanut | Germination and growth of crop | UV-VIS | 380.85–796.62 nm | [ | |
| Meat | Beef | Thermal change inspection | Fluorescence | 250–550 | [ |
| Beef | Adulteration detection | NIR-MIR | 2.5–19 µm | [ | |
| Frozen fish | Freshness evaluation | Fluorescence | 250–800 | [ | |
| Dairy | Egg | Contamination detection | UV-VIS-NIR | 200–860 | [ |
| Goat milk | Fatty acid content detection | VIS-NIR | 400–2498 | [ | |
| Oil | Edible oil | Stability analysis | NMR | 300 MHz (1H) | [ |
| Olive oil | Adulteration detection | Fluorescence | 250–720 | [ | |
| Ocimum essential oil | Antioxidant property identification | NIR-MIR | 2.5–18 µm | [ | |
| Beverage | Tea leaf | Tea polyphenol level detection | UV-VIS-NIR | 347–2506 | [ |
| Green tea leaf | Caffeine and catechins content detection | VIS-NIR | 400–2500 | [ | |
| Coffee | Geographic and genotypic origin identification | NIR | 1100–2498 | [ | |
| Coffee | Roasting degree and blend composition detection | NIR | 800–2857 | [ | |
| Tomato juice | Quality inspection | NIR-MIR | 2.5–14 µm | [ | |
| Apple wine | Volatile compound detection | NIR | 833–2500 | [ | |
| Rice wine | Fermentation monitoring | NIR-MIR | 2.5–25 µm | [ | |
| Commercial | Cotton fibre | Cotton type identification | NIR | 800–2500 | [ |
| Cotton fibre | Cotton fibre micronaire measurement | VIS-NIR | 400–2500 | [ | |
| Natural rubber | Protein and lipid content detection | NIR-MIR | 2.5–25 µm | [ | |
| Natural rubber | Chemical interaction during vulcanizing process | NIR-MIR | 2.5–25 µm | [ | |
| Natural rubber | Rubber silane reaction | NMR | 400 MHz (1H), | [ | |
| Natural rubber | Moisture content detection | VIS-NIR | 400–1100 | [ | |
| Natural rubber | Vulcanization system effect | Dielectric | 10-1 < Hz < 107 | [ | |
| Neem leaf | Pest control | UV-VIS | 200–800 nm | [ | |
| Farm and Plantation | Soil | Quality inspection | NIR | 780–5000 | [ |
| Soil | Nitrogen content detection | NIR | 800–2564 | [ | |
| Soil | Chemical and physical property estimation | NIR-MIR | 1430–2500, | [ | |
| Soil | Nitrogen detection | NIR | 900–1700 | [ | |
| Soil | Nitrogen detection | NIR | 900–1700 | [ | |
| Soil and water | Contaminant detection | VIS-NIR | 400–2500 | [ | |
| Water hyacinth | Pollutant concentration detection | Dielectric | 10-1 < Hz < 106 | [ | |
| Flower | Plant type identification | VIS | 635, 685, 785 | [ |
Applications of spectral imaging technique in agriculture.
| Class | Product | Application | Method | Wavelength (nm) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fruit | Apple | Bruise detection | Hyper. line scan | 400–2500, | [ |
| Apple | Bruise detection timing | Hyper. line scan | 400–2500 | [ | |
| Apple | Bruise detection | Multi. area scan | 740, 950 | [ | |
| Apple | Bruise and faeces detection | Multi. line scan | 530, 665, 750, 800 | [ | |
| Apple | Firmness evaluation | Multi. area scan | 680, 880, 905, 940 | [ | |
| Citrus | Canker detection | Multi. area scan | 730, 830 | [ | |
| Peach | Firmness evaluation | Hyper. line scan | 500–1000 | [ | |
| Peach | Maturity evaluation | Multi. area scan | 450, 675, 800 | [ | |
| Cantaloupe | Faeces detection | Hyper. line scan | 425–774 | [ | |
| Blueberry | Firmness evaluation, soluble solid content detection | Hyper. line scan | 400–1000 | [ | |
| Strawberry | Maturity evaluation | Hyper. line scan | 380–1030 | [ | |
| Cherry | Pit detection | Hyper. line scan | 450–1000 | [ | |
| Grape | Quality evaluation | Hyper. line scan | 400–1000 | [ | |
| Banana | Maturity evaluation | Hyper. area scan | 500–700 | [ | |
| Tomato | Maturity evaluation | Hyper. line scan | 396–736 | [ | |
| Tomato | Maturity evaluation | Multi. area scan | 530, 595, 630, 850 | [ | |
| Cucumber | Chilling injury detection | Hyper. line scan | 447–951 | [ | |
| Vegetable | Freeze-dried broccoli | Glucosinolate detection | Hyper. line scan | 400–1700 | [ |
| Potato | Cooking time prediction | Hyper. line scan | 400–1000 | [ | |
| Onion | Sour skin disease detection | Hyper. area scan | 950–1650 | [ | |
| Mushroom | Bruise detection | Hyper. line scan | 400–1000 | [ | |
| Grain | Rice plant | Nitrogen content detection | Hyper. line scan | 400–1000 | [ |
| Thai jasmine rice | Rice variety identification | Multi. area scan | 545, 575 | [ | |
| Wheat | Fungus detection | Hyper. area scan | 1000-1600 | [ | |
| Wheat | Damage detection | Hyper. line scan | 1000–2500 | [ | |
| Peanut | Tomato spot wilt disease detection | Multi. Area scan | 475, 560, 668, 717, 840 | [ | |
| Corn | Oil and oleic acid content detection | Hyper. area scan | 950-1700 | [ | |
| Corn | Aflatoxin detection | Hyper. line scan | 400–600 | [ | |
| Meat | Chicken | Skin tumour detection | Hyper. line scan | 420–850 | [ |
| Chicken | Heart disease detection | Multi. area scan | 495, 535, 585, 605 | [ | |
| Chicken | Faeces detection | Multi. area scan | 520, 560 | [ | |
| Chicken | Wholesomeness inspection | Multi. line scan | 580, 620 | [ | |
| Beef | Tenderness evaluation | Hyper. line scan | 400–1000 | [ | |
| Beef | Microbial spoilage detection | Hyper. line scan | 400–1100 | [ | |
| Lamb | Lamb variety identification | Hyper. line scan | 900–1700 | [ | |
| Pork meat | Hyper. line scan | 470–960 | [ | ||
| Pork meat | Quality inspection | Hyper. line scan | 900–1700 | [ | |
| Fish | Moisture and fat content detection | Hyper. line scan | 460–1040 | [ | |
| Fish | Ridge detection | Hyper. line scan | 400–1000 | [ | |
| Salmon | Microbial spoilage detection | Hyper. line scan | 400–1000 | [ | |
| Dehydrated prawn | Moisture content detection | Hyper. line scan | 380–1100 | [ | |
| Prawn | Adulteration detection | Hyper. line scan | 380–1030 | [ | |
| Dairy | Milk powder | Melamine detection | Hyper. line scan | 990–1700 | [ |
| Milk | Fat content detection | Hyper. line scan | 530–900 | [ | |
| Milk | Melamine detection | Hyper. point scan | 4–98 µm | [ | |
| Oil | Olive oil | Free acidity, peroxide and moisture content detection | Hyper. line scan | 900–1700 | [ |
| Beverage | Tea | Quality inspection | Hyper. line scan | 408–1117 | [ |
| Tea | Moisture content detection | Hyper. line scan | 874–1734 | [ | |
| Tea | Tea variety identification | Multi. area scan | 580, 680, 800 | [ | |
| Farm and Plantation | Tea bush | Tea variety, growth status and disease identification | Hyper. area scan | 325–1075 | [ |
| Coffee crop | Detection of disease/infection | Hyper. area scan | 440–850 | [ | |
| Coffee plantation | Monitoring chlorophyll content | Multi. area scan | 490–2190 | [ |
Note: Hyper. = hyperspectral, multi. = multispectral.