Adrian I Espiritu1, Paul Matthew D Pasco2. 1. Department of Neurosciences, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines. Electronic address: aiespiritu@up.edu.ph. 2. Department of Neurosciences, College of Medicine and Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines. Electronic address: pdpasco@up.edu.ph.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory and autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system that typically presents with optic neuritis and myelitis. Azathioprine (AZA) is one of the available immunotherapies with purported beneficial effects for patients with NMOSD. At present, there are no systematic reviews that extensively pooled the effects of AZA compared to other interventions for this condition. The objective of this study, therefore, is to determine the efficacy and safety of AZA in patients with NMOSD using systematic review of relevant studies. METHODS: Major health electronic databases, which included CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and HERDIN, were searched from May 2017 to November 2018 for relevant studies involving adult and pediatric patients with NMOSD. Randomized controlled trials, and either prospective or retrospective cohort designs that assessed the reduction or prevention of relapse or disability and the occurrence of adverse events related to AZA use compared to placebo or to other active drugs were considered. Assessment of risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: From a total of 273 records, 9 relevant studies (1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 3 prospective cohort studies, 5 retrospective studies) which involved a total of 977 patients, were included. One RCT and several observational studies revealed that AZA regimen may be inferior to rituximab in terms of annualized relapse rate, reduction of disability as measured by the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), risk for relapse and relapse-free rate. Efficacy data were very limited in the comparison of AZA to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), to cyclophosphamide, and to interferon-β for patients with NMOSD. Occurrence of any adverse event, elevated liver enzymes/hepatoxicity, leukopenia and hair loss associated with AZA use were significantly greater compared to MMF, which may lead to medication noncompliance. CONCLUSION: AZA improves relapses and disability in patients with NMOSD but this regimen is associated with relatively frequent adverse events based on limited published evidences. More well-conducted clinical trials are necessary to establish with certainty the beneficial and harmful effects of AZA in patients with NMOSD.
BACKGROUND:Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory and autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system that typically presents with optic neuritis and myelitis. Azathioprine (AZA) is one of the available immunotherapies with purported beneficial effects for patients with NMOSD. At present, there are no systematic reviews that extensively pooled the effects of AZA compared to other interventions for this condition. The objective of this study, therefore, is to determine the efficacy and safety of AZA in patients with NMOSD using systematic review of relevant studies. METHODS: Major health electronic databases, which included CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and HERDIN, were searched from May 2017 to November 2018 for relevant studies involving adult and pediatric patients with NMOSD. Randomized controlled trials, and either prospective or retrospective cohort designs that assessed the reduction or prevention of relapse or disability and the occurrence of adverse events related to AZA use compared to placebo or to other active drugs were considered. Assessment of risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: From a total of 273 records, 9 relevant studies (1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 3 prospective cohort studies, 5 retrospective studies) which involved a total of 977 patients, were included. One RCT and several observational studies revealed that AZA regimen may be inferior to rituximab in terms of annualized relapse rate, reduction of disability as measured by the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), risk for relapse and relapse-free rate. Efficacy data were very limited in the comparison of AZA to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), to cyclophosphamide, and to interferon-β for patients with NMOSD. Occurrence of any adverse event, elevated liver enzymes/hepatoxicity, leukopenia and hair loss associated with AZA use were significantly greater compared to MMF, which may lead to medication noncompliance. CONCLUSION:AZA improves relapses and disability in patients with NMOSD but this regimen is associated with relatively frequent adverse events based on limited published evidences. More well-conducted clinical trials are necessary to establish with certainty the beneficial and harmful effects of AZA in patients with NMOSD.
Authors: Romain Marignier; Jeffrey L Bennett; Ho Jin Kim; Brian G Weinshenker; Sean J Pittock; Dean Wingerchuk; Kazuko Fujihara; Friedemann Paul; Gary R Cutter; Ari J Green; Orhan Aktas; Hans-Peter Hartung; Fred D Lublin; Ian M Williams; Jorn Drappa; Dewei She; Daniel Cimbora; William Rees; Michael Smith; John N Ratchford; Eliezer Katz; Bruce A C Cree Journal: Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Date: 2021-03-26