J C Radosa1, M P Radosa2, P A Schweitzer1, C G Radosa3, L Stotz1, A Hamza1, Z Takacs1, P M Lepper4, S Wagenpfeil5, M Linxweiler6, E Morinello7, E-F Solomayer1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 2. Department of Gynaecology, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 3. Department of Radiology, Dresden University Hospital, Dresden, Germany. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Pneumology, Allergology and Critical Care Medicine, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 5. Institute of Medical Biometry, Epidemiology& Medical Informatics, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 6. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany. 7. Department of Anaesthesiology, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of two different intraoperative CO2 pressures (8 and 15 mmHg) during laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign uterine pathologies in terms of postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain, laparoscopy-mediated vegetative alterations, pain medication requirement, arterial CO2 pressure (pCO2 ), surgical parameters, and safety. DESIGN: Prospective randomised controlled study. SETTING: German university hospital. POPULATION: Female patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign uterine pathologies. METHODS: Patients were randomised to a standard pressure (SP; 15 mmHg, control) or low-pressure (LP; 8 mmHg, experimental) group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain intensities, measured via numeric rating scale (NRS) and vegetative parameters (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, bloating) at 3, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were pain medication requirement (mg) and arterial pCO2 (mmHg). Surgical parameters and intra- and postoperative complications were also recorded. RESULTS: In total, 178 patients were included. Patients in the LP group (n = 91) showed significantly lower postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain scores, fewer vegetative alterations, lower pain medication requirements, a shorter postoperative hospitalization, and lower intra- and postoperative arterial pCO2 values compared with the SP group (n = 87; P ≤ 0.01). No differences in intra- and postoperative complications were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-pressure laparoscopy seems to be an effective and safe technique for the reduction of postoperative pain and laparoscopy-induced metabolic and vegetative alterations following laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Low-pressure laparoscopy seems to be an effective and safe technique for reduction of pain following laparoscopic hysterectomy.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of two different intraoperative CO2 pressures (8 and 15 mmHg) during laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign uterine pathologies in terms of postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain, laparoscopy-mediated vegetative alterations, pain medication requirement, arterial CO2 pressure (pCO2 ), surgical parameters, and safety. DESIGN: Prospective randomised controlled study. SETTING: German university hospital. POPULATION: Female patients undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign uterine pathologies. METHODS: Patients were randomised to a standard pressure (SP; 15 mmHg, control) or low-pressure (LP; 8 mmHg, experimental) group. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain intensities, measured via numeric rating scale (NRS) and vegetative parameters (fatigue, nausea, vomiting, bloating) at 3, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were pain medication requirement (mg) and arterial pCO2 (mmHg). Surgical parameters and intra- and postoperative complications were also recorded. RESULTS: In total, 178 patients were included. Patients in the LP group (n = 91) showed significantly lower postoperative abdominal and shoulder pain scores, fewer vegetative alterations, lower pain medication requirements, a shorter postoperative hospitalization, and lower intra- and postoperative arterial pCO2 values compared with the SP group (n = 87; P ≤ 0.01). No differences in intra- and postoperative complications were observed between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low-pressure laparoscopy seems to be an effective and safe technique for the reduction of postoperative pain and laparoscopy-induced metabolic and vegetative alterations following laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Low-pressure laparoscopy seems to be an effective and safe technique for reduction of pain following laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Authors: A C Kaya; M P Radosa; J S M Zimmermann; L Stotz; S Findeklee; A Hamza; P Sklavounos; F Z Takacs; G Wagenpfeil; C G Radosa; E F Solomayer; J C Radosa Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2021-08-21 Impact factor: 2.344