Literature DB >> 31135889

The American Society for Clinical Pathology's 2018 Vacancy Survey of Medical Laboratories in the United States.

Edna Garcia1, Iman Kundu1, Melissa Kelly2, Ryan Soles2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent and distribution of workforce shortages within the nation's medical laboratories.
METHODS: The survey was conducted through collaboration between the American Society for Clinical Pathology's Institute of Science, Technology, and Policy in Washington, DC, and the Evaluation, Measurement, and Assessment Department and Board of Certification in Chicago, IL. Data were collected via an internet survey distributed to individuals who were able to report on staffing and certifications for their laboratories.
RESULTS: Results show increased vacancy rates for laboratory positions across all departments surveyed. The overall retirement rates are at its lowest, suggesting that the field has already experienced loss of personnel with a vast amount of experience.
CONCLUSIONS: Focus on retention of qualified and certified laboratory professionals would be crucial factors in addressing the needs of the laboratory workforce. The field also needs to intensify its efforts on recruiting the next generation of laboratory personnel. © American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  ASCP Vacancy Survey; Anatomic pathology; Certification; Clinical pathology; Laboratory; Laboratory departments; Laboratory staff; Laboratory staff recruitment; Laboratory staff retention; Workforce

Year:  2019        PMID: 31135889     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqz046

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  5 in total

1.  Strengthening Laboratory Partnerships, Enhancing Recruitment, and Improving Retention Through Training and Outreach Activities: The Minnesota Experience.

Authors:  Anna K Strain; Maureen M Sullivan
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 2.  The Lancet Commission on diagnostics: transforming access to diagnostics.

Authors:  Kenneth A Fleming; Susan Horton; Michael L Wilson; Rifat Atun; Kristen DeStigter; John Flanigan; Shahin Sayed; Pierrick Adam; Bertha Aguilar; Savvas Andronikou; Catharina Boehme; William Cherniak; Annie Ny Cheung; Bernice Dahn; Lluis Donoso-Bach; Tania Douglas; Patricia Garcia; Sarwat Hussain; Hari S Iyer; Mikashmi Kohli; Alain B Labrique; Lai-Meng Looi; John G Meara; John Nkengasong; Madhukar Pai; Kara-Lee Pool; Kaushik Ramaiya; Lee Schroeder; Devanshi Shah; Richard Sullivan; Bien-Soo Tan; Kamini Walia
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Proceedings of the Clinical Microbiology Open 2018 and 2019 - a Discussion about Emerging Trends, Challenges, and the Future of Clinical Microbiology.

Authors:  Christopher D Doern; Melissa B Miller; Kevin Alby; Michael A Bachman; Stephen M Brecher; Aida Casiano-Colon; Marc Roger Couturier; J Kristie Johnson; James E Kirby; Erin McElvania; Duane W Newton; Frederick S Nolte; Preeti Pancholi; Peggy McNult; Vaishali Dharmarha; Sherry Dunbar
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 11.677

4.  The Impact of Total Automaton on the Clinical Laboratory Workforce: A Case Study.

Authors:  Yaser A Al Naam; Salah Elsafi; Majed H Al Jahdali; Randa S Al Shaman; Bader H Al-Qurouni; Eidan M Al Zahrani
Journal:  J Healthc Leadersh       Date:  2022-05-09

Review 5.  The Hidden Crisis in the Times of COVID-19: Critical Shortages of Medical Laboratory Professionals in Clinical Microbiology.

Authors:  Amy L Leber; Ellena Peterson; Jennifer Dien Bard
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-06-06       Impact factor: 11.677

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.