| Literature DB >> 31135884 |
Francisco J Rubio1, Bernard Rachet2, Roch Giorgi3, Camille Maringe4, Aurélien Belot4.
Abstract
In cancer epidemiology using population-based data, regression models for the excess mortality hazard is a useful method to estimate cancer survival and to describe the association between prognosis factors and excess mortality. This method requires expected mortality rates from general population life tables: each cancer patient is assigned an expected (background) mortality rate obtained from the life tables, typically at least according to their age and sex, from the population they belong to. However, those life tables may be insufficiently stratified, as some characteristics such as deprivation, ethnicity, and comorbidities, are not available in the life tables for a number of countries. This may affect the background mortality rate allocated to each patient, and it has been shown that not including relevant information for assigning an expected mortality rate to each patient induces a bias in the estimation of the regression parameters of the excess hazard model. We propose two parametric corrections in excess hazard regression models, including a single-parameter or a random effect (frailty), to account for possible mismatches in the life table and thus misspecification of the background mortality rate. In an extensive simulation study, the good statistical performance of the proposed approach is demonstrated, and we illustrate their use on real population-based data of lung cancer patients. We present conditions and limitations of these methods and provide some recommendations for their use in practice.Entities:
Keywords: Excess mortality hazard; Exponentiated Weibull distribution; General hazard structure; Life tables; Net survival
Year: 2021 PMID: 31135884 PMCID: PMC7846106 DOI: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxz017
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biostatistics ISSN: 1465-4644 Impact factor: 5.899