| Literature DB >> 3113584 |
Abstract
In summary, I have argued that the arguments offered or hinted at in favour of doctors' breaking medical confidentiality by passing on information about their patients' HIV state to others, including other doctors, when this is against the patient's considered wishes are generally unconvincing. Although in highly exceptional cases there may be justifications for overriding confidentiality, the requirement of medical confidentiality is a very strong, though not absolute, obligation. Patients, their contacts, doctors and their staff, and the common good are most likely to be best served if that tradition continues to be honoured.Entities:
Keywords: Health Care and Public Health; Professional Patient Relationship; Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Behavior; Confidential Information; Developed Countries; Diseases; England; Ethics; Europe; Hiv Infections; Informed Consent; Interpersonal Relations; Northern Europe; Philosophical Overview; Physician-patient Relations; United Kingdom; Viral Diseases
Mesh:
Year: 1987 PMID: 3113584 PMCID: PMC1246840 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.294.6588.1675
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) ISSN: 0267-0623