Literature DB >> 31135253

Spared Perception of the Structure of Scenes after Hippocampal Damage.

Zhisen J Urgolites1,2, Ramona O Hopkins3,4, Larry R Squire1,2.   

Abstract

To explore whether the hippocampus might be important for certain spatial operations in addition to its well-known role in memory, we administered two tasks in which participants judged whether objects embedded in scenes or whether scenes themselves could exist in 3-D space. Patients with damage limited to the hippocampus performed as well as controls in both tasks. A patient with large medial-temporal lobe lesions had a bias to judge objects in scenes and scenes themselves as possible, performing well with possible stimuli but poorly with impossible stimuli in both tasks. All patients were markedly impaired at remembering the tasks. The hippocampus appears not to be essential for judging the structural coherence of objects in scenes or the coherence of scenes. The findings conform to what is now a sizeable literature emphasizing the importance of the hippocampus for memory. We discuss our results in light of findings that other patients have sometimes been reported to be disadvantaged by spatial tasks like the ones studied here, despite less hippocampal damage and milder memory impairment.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31135253      PMCID: PMC7147318          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01416

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  35 in total

1.  Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction.

Authors:  A M Dale; B Fischl; M I Sereno
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  MR volumetric analysis of the human entorhinal, perirhinal, and temporopolar cortices.

Authors:  R Insausti; K Juottonen; H Soininen; A M Insausti; K Partanen; P Vainio; M P Laakso; A Pitkänen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Identification of the human medial temporal lobe regions on magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Edit Frankó; Ana Maria Insausti; Emilio Artacho-Pérula; Ricardo Insausti; Chantal Chavoix
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-08-30       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Human medial temporal lobe damage can disrupt the perception of single objects.

Authors:  Andy C H Lee; Sarah R Rudebeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Map reading, navigating from maps, and the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Zhisen J Urgolites; Soyun Kim; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The nature of anterograde and retrograde memory impairment after damage to the medial temporal lobe.

Authors:  Christine N Smith; Jennifer C Frascino; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Neural basis of the cognitive map: path integration does not require hippocampus or entorhinal cortex.

Authors:  Yael Shrager; C Brock Kirwan; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Attenuated boundary extension produces a paradoxical memory advantage in amnesic patients.

Authors:  Sinéad L Mullally; Helene Intraub; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Sparing of spatial mental imagery in patients with hippocampal lesions.

Authors:  Soyun Kim; Grégoire Borst; William L Thompson; Ramona O Hopkins; Stephen M Kosslyn; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Spared perception of object geometry and object components after hippocampal damage.

Authors:  Zhisen J Urgolites; Daniel A Levy; Ramona O Hopkins; Larry R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.