Literature DB >> 31134920

Role of tumor-associated immune cells in prostate cancer: angel or devil?

Shui-Qing Wu1, Hao Su1, Yin-Huai Wang1, Xiao-Kun Zhao1.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in the reproductive system of older males. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is an important treatment for prostate cancer patients. However, almost all prostate cancer patients unavoidably progress to the castration-resistant stage after ADT treatment. Recent studies have shown that tumor-associated immune cells play major roles in the initiation, progression, and metastasis of prostate cancer. Various phenotypes of tumor-associated immune cells have tumor-promoting or antitumor functions mediated by interacting with tumor cells. Here, we review the current knowledge of tumor-associated immune cells in prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  immune tolerance; prostate cancer; tumor associated immune cells; tumor microenvironment

Year:  2019        PMID: 31134920      PMCID: PMC6732889          DOI: 10.4103/aja.aja_47_19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer is becoming one of the most common malignancies in the male reproductive system in China. The number of estimated new cases of prostate cancer in men over 60 years of age in China was about 56 600 in 2015.1 With the improvement of living standards and diagnostic techniques, the incidence rate of prostate cancer has increased each year.12 Prostatectomy or radiotherapy, combined with endocrine therapy, is the first choice for the management of intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer. Early stage prostate cancer patients receive an indolent course of treatment during the first 10–15 years, and tumor progression and aggressive metastasis may develop in the long term.3 However, for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients, most will finally develop into castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) after androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for about one and a half years. Moreover, about a third of CRPC patients will develop bone metastasis within 2 years, resulting in cancer-specific death.45 Therefore, it is an urgent and important issue to identify potential mechanisms for the initiation and progression of prostate cancer.

INFLAMMATION AND PROSTATE CANCER

Chronic inflammation is now considered as a major factor in the development of various malignancies.6 Accumulating studies have shown that prostatic inflammation is involved in the initiation of proliferative inflammatory atrophy (PIA), a kind of precursor lesion related to the development of prostate cancer.78 Bacterial infection, autoimmune responses, and other proinflammatory factors can lead to intraprostatic inflammation with consequential modification of the prostatic microenvironment. The immune cells involved in the inflammatory microenvironment can affect the initiation and progression of prostate cancer via the secretion of cytokines and growth factors. However, the roles of these inflammatory cells are still unclear because of their plasticity and phenotypes in the different stages of the tumor microenvironment. Some studies have indicated racial differences in inflammation.91011 Vidal et al.10 showed that the Asian population is more likely to experience acute prostate inflammation compared with Caucasians, which presents a higher risk of prostate cancer for Asians. The underlying mechanisms of race differences in the inflammatory response are complicated. It is generally accepted that acute prostate inflammation is considered as a protective factor, whereas chronic inflammation is significantly associated with the development of prostate cancer. As mentioned above, inflammation is a major characteristic of human malignancies. Tumor-associated immune cells are main components in the tumor microenvironment. The infiltrating immune cells in the prostate tumor microenvironment include T regulatory cells (Tregs), tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), neutrophils, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Many studies have shown that tumor-associated immune cells play a major role in the progression of prostate cancer.1213 Studies concerning the development of tumor-associated immune cells have focused on drugs and the application of immune vaccines to provide a new direction for the management of prostate cancer.

TUMOR-INFILTRATING LYMPHOCYTES AND PROSTATE CANCER

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) contribute to the progression of prostate cancer through a variety of mechanisms. Traditionally, effector T cells are divided into Th1 and Th2 subgroups. However, in recent decades, emerging evidence has indicated that Tregs subsets of CD4+ cells play a major role in regulating tumor progression by mediating immunosuppression.1415 Tregs, which were first reported by Sakaguchi et al.15 as a subset of T cells with a CD4+ CD25- high phenotype, play an important role in regulating immune tolerance of the tumor microenvironment. Recent studies have found that FOXP3+ is also an important phenotype of Tregs.1617 Zhao et al.17 found that the number of Tregs obviously increases in the bone metastatic microenvironment of prostate cancer. The infiltration of CD4+ CD25- high Tregs into bone marrow contributes to the initiation of bone metastasis in prostate cancer patients, by providing an immunosuppressive microenvironment. Akins et al.18 found that FOXP3+ Tregs in the prostate epithelium increase obviously after ADT, while cytotoxic T cells are restricted to the prostatic stroma. In addition, ADT combined with Treg clearance therapy reduced the prostate tumor burden and inhibited tumor recurrence in mice. Mo et al.19 indicated that Treg depletion enhanced the antitumor immunity of a tumor cell vaccine against prostate cancer in a subcutaneous prostate cancer mouse model. Davidsson et al.20 found that infiltration of CD4+ FOXP3+ Tregs into prostate tissue was positively correlated with Gleason scores and pathological tumor stages of prostate cancer. Therefore, Tregs may be involved in the development of prostate carcinoma from atrophic hyperplasia. Flammiger et al.21 found that an increased number of FOXP3+ cells in prostate carcinomas was obviously correlated with an elevated tumor stage and proliferation index, suggesting that the infiltration of Tregs into the tumor microenvironment contributes to the development of prostate carcinoma. Nardone et al.22 performed a retrospective study and found that the number of FOXP3+ Tregs in prostate cancer tissues was negatively correlated with overall and progression-free survival times of prostate cancer patients. Studies regarding the role of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in prostate cancer are summarized in . Summary of studies about the role of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in prostate cancer TILs: tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; FOXP3: forkhead box P3; CD: cluster of differentiation; PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homolog; ICOS: inducible T cell costimulatory; SCID: severe combined immunodeficiency; PC-3: prostate cancer cell-3; ADT: androgen depletion therapy; Tregs: regulatory T cells; PSA: prostate-specific androgen; PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival; PD-1: programmed cell death protein-1 Thus far, the phenotypes of Tregs that infiltrate into the prostate tumor microenvironment and their mechanisms involved in the regulation of prostate tumor initiation and in the development are still unclear.23 It is generally believed that Tregs mainly exist in secondary lymphoid organs and can be recruited into the tumor microenvironment via the induction of tumor-associated chemokines. In addition, Tregs mediate immunosuppressive effects by interacting with tumor cells and secreting related factors. For example, Tregs inhibit the function of antigen-presenting cells by interacting with CD80/CD86 on antigen-presenting cells via their surface cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) receptor, which inhibits the anticancer functions of cytotoxic and effector T cells. Moreover, Tregs directly inhibit the function of effector T cells by secreting granulase B perforating protein.2324 Currently, Treg-related immune checkpoint inhibitors are being developed or are in clinical trials for anticancer therapy. For example, CTLA-4 is commonly expressed by Tregs, and anti-CTLA-4 monoclonal antibody drugs such as ipilimumab in combination with ADT, sipuleucel-T, or programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors are being evaluated in clinical trials for prostate cancer patients.2526

TUMOR-ASSOCIATED MACROPHAGES AND PROSTATE CANCER

Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are macrophages that infiltrate into tumor tissues. Traditionally, macrophages were only considered to play an anticancer role in the tumor microenvironment. However, many recent studies have shown that macrophages in the tumor microenvironment can also be educated by tumor cells or hijacked by dead cells to exert a tumor-promoting effect.2728 Some studies have reported that TAMs can be divided into classical activation (M1 type) macrophages and alternative activation (M2 type) macrophages, according to their different activation pathways.2930 It is generally believed that M1-type macrophages promote inflammation, whereas M2-type macrophages promote tissue repair by inducing angiogenesis and synthesis of matrix proteins.27 It is widely accepted that there are many more M2-type macrophages than M1-type macrophages in the tumor microenvironment. Emerging evidence has indicated that increased infiltration of macrophages into the tumor microenvironment predicts a worse prognosis of breast, prostate, colorectal, and ovarian cancers.303132 In recent years, the role of TAMs in the initiation, development, and metastasis of prostate cancer has become a research hotspot. Lanciotti et al.33 found that high-density TAMs in prostate cancer tissue predict poor biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients after radical prostatectomy, and M2-type macrophages are associated with extrafascial invasion of prostate cancer. Distant metastasis is a common and complicated issue in advanced prostate cancer patients. Some studies have reported that the total number of TAMs, especially the number of infiltrated M2-type macrophages, increases in metastatic prostate cancer, suggesting that TAM infiltration is a risk factor for distant metastasis of prostate cancer.3435 Neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) of prostate cancer cells in the prostate tumor microenvironment is a major feature of castration-resistant prostate cancer. NED is usually positively associated with invasive prostate cancer and negatively associated with clinical outcomes of prostate cancer.3536 Lee et al.37 found that neuroendocrine cells in human prostate cancer tissues are usually associated with BMP-6 protein expression and TAM infiltration. In addition, the removal of IL-6 or macrophages in mouse models inhibited BMP-6-induced NED. Wang et al.36 found that targeted blockade of interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) and high mobility protein-1 (HMGB-1) blocked the positive feedback pathway between TAMs and NED in prostate cancer, which resulted in improvement of the enzalutamide therapeutic effect in prostate cancer patients. Therefore, macrophage infiltration into the prostate tumor environment, especially M2-type TAMs, promotes the development and metastasis of prostate cancer and participates in the regulation of NED and ADT resistance in prostate cancer. The underlying mechanisms of TAMs in the regulation of tumor initiation and progression of prostate cancer are complex. It is generally believed that TAMs influence the proliferation and migration of cancer cells via direct interactions with tumor cells or indirectly by secretion of cytokines, providing structural space, and participating in every stage of tumor progression. Chen et al.38 found that the secretion of nephroblastoma overexpressed (NOV/CCN3) from prostate cancer cells induces TAMs to express CD204, and then activates the NF-kB signaling pathway, mediates the secretion of VEGF by M2 type TAMs, and promotes tumor angiogenesis. In addition, Soki et al.39 showed that TAMs promote tumor progression via interactions with apoptotic cells through the MFG-E8 pathway in the microenvironment of prostate cancer with bone metastasis. Further exploration of the potential mechanisms and immune checkpoints of TAMs in the prostate tumor microenvironment may provide new concepts for the treatment of prostate cancer.

TUMOR-ASSOCIATED NEUTROPHILS AND PROSTATE CANCER

Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) specifically refer to neutrophils that infiltrate into the tumor microenvironment. The roles of TANs in various tumors are still controversial.40 Fridlender et al.41 found that TANs function like a “double-edged sword,” which can acquire a tumor-promoting phenotype via induction by TGF-β. However, after blockage of TGF-β, TANs exert an antitumor effect, suggesting that TANs can be classified into N1 and N2 phenotypes similar to TAMs. Hanahan and Weinberg.42 found that TANs promote tumor-related inflammation, thereby contributing to tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and tumor angiogenesis. Casbon et al.43 showed that TANs mediate immunosuppression by inhibiting the tumor-killing function of cytotoxic T cells. However, some studies have reported that elevated TAN infiltration is positively correlated with the prognosis of tumors. For example, Governa et al.44 found that TANs enhance the reactivity of CD8+ T cells and activate T cell receptors, contributing to the death of tumor cells and prolonging the survival time of colorectal cancer patients. Hence, the role of TAN infiltration into the tumor microenvironment is complicated and undefined. The mechanisms involved in the role TANs in tumors still need to be elucidated. TANs promote the development of cancer via TAN-induced immunosuppression as well as changes in the tumor microenvironment caused by TAN infiltration. Furthermore, TANs function as tumor killers through the promotion of T cell-mediated tumor clearance or by secreting cytotoxic factors. The double-edged sword effects of TANs may be involved in the high heterogeneity or plasticity of neutrophils themselves. Moreover, the specific microenvironment in different tumor stages contributes to the multiple roles of TANs.3045

TUMOR-ASSOCIATED MYELOID-DERIVED SUPPRESSOR CELLS AND PROSTATE CANCER

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) are immature myeloid cells including immature granulocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells. In humans, the phenotypes of MDSCs are mainly CD13, CD33, and CD34. Tumor-associated MDSCs are group of MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment. Recent studies have shown that MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment promote the proliferation and metastasis of tumor cells by mediating immunosuppressive effects.4647 There is also clinical evidence that treatment with MDSCs prolongs the survival time of cancer patients. Moreover, MDSC-targeted therapy combined with other immunotherapeutic drugs are under investigation.4849 Some studies have reported the role of MDSCs in the initiation and development of prostate cancer. Jachetti et al.50 found that multinuclear MDSCs induced immunosuppression and promoted the development of prostate cancer via interactions with mast cells through the CD40-CD40L pathway, and elevated expression of mast cell- and MDSC-related genes was obviously associated with poor prognoses of patients with prostate cancer. Chi et al.51 found that increased MDSCs in the circulating blood of prostate cancer patients were obviously associated with a poor prognosis. In recent years, preclinical trials and related clinical trials have been performed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of MDSC inhibitors in prostate cancer patients. Yin et al.52 indicated that phosphatidylserine-targeted therapy inhibits the differentiation and growth of MDSCs, promotes the transformation of TAMs into the M1 type, and then inhibits the growth of prostate cancer cells. The phosphatidylserine-targeted drug bavituximab is being evaluated in clinical trials. In addition, some other MDSC-targeted drugs are being evaluated in clinical trials for prostate cancer, such as verteporfin and axitinib.1353 The mechanisms underlying the roles of MDSCs are still unclear. Ostrand-Rosenberg et al.53 reported that MDSCs in the tumor microenvironment upregulate the expression of IL-10, downregulate the expression of IL-6, IL-12, and MHC II in macrophages, and induce the differentiation of M2 type macrophages, which promotes the proliferation and metastasis of malignancies. Moreover, MDSCs prohibit the antitumor function of mature dendritic cells via impairment of their antigen presentation and migration, which facilitates the development of immune evasion and promotes the proliferation of tumor cells. The infiltration of tumor-associated MDSCs and their protumor roles were found to be associated with the PI3K/PTEN/AKT pathway in mouse models of prostate cancer.13 However, whether MDSCs are involved with PTEN loss and PI3K activation in prostate cancer patients remains to be elucidated.

SUMMARY

Immune cells in the prostate tumor microenvironment play a role as a double-edged sword. At various disease stages, tumor-associated immune cells with specific phenotypes may mediate the immune evasion or tolerance of prostate tumor cells, by direct interactions with tumor cells or indirectly by secreting cytokines to promote the initiation and progression of prostate cancer. We have summarized the relationships between tumor-associated immune cells and prostate cancer cells in . The development of immune vaccines and immune checkpoint inhibitors may provide a new direction for the treatment of prostate cancer, especially metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Graphical model for the role of tumor associated immune cells in the initiation and progression of prostate cancer.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION

SQW and HS performed literature searching and data collection. SQW and HS prepared the manuscript. XKZ and YHW participated in the design of the study and helped revise the manuscript. YHW conceived of this review and participated in its design and coordination and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

COMPETING INTERESTS

All authors declared no competing interests.
Table 1

Summary of studies about the role of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in prostate cancer

First author (year)Study sourcesIdentification of TILsManagementOutcome
Akins et al. 201018Pten knockout miceFoxP3+Anti-CD25 antibodyTregs depletion combined with in situ vaccination and ADT can reduce castration-resistant tumor burden
Zhao et al. 201217SCID mice with PC-3 intratibial injectionCD4+CD25high, CD4+Foxp3+Intravenously transfused with activated TregsBone marrow Treg cells may facilitate cancer bone metastasis and contribute to bone deposition
Flammiger et al. 201321Patients’ samplesFoxP3+Immunohistochemistry analysisIncreased infiltrating of Tregs significantly involved with reduced PSA recurrence-free survival and advanced tumor stage
Nardone et al. 201622Patients’ samplesFoxP3+PD-1Immunohistochemistry analysisLower expression of PD-1/FoxP3+ correlated with prolonged PFS and OS
Mo et al. 201719Subcutaneous mice model of RM-1 prostate cancerICOSAnti-ICOS antibodyICOS blocking could deplete the infiltrated Tregs and enhance antitumor immunity of tumor cell vaccine in prostate cancer
Davidsson et al. 201820Patients’ samplesCD4+FOXP3+, CD8+FOXP3+Immunohistochemistry analysisFour-fold increased risk of prostate cancer in men with epithelial CD4+ Tregs infiltration

TILs: tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; FOXP3: forkhead box P3; CD: cluster of differentiation; PTEN: phosphatase and tensin homolog; ICOS: inducible T cell costimulatory; SCID: severe combined immunodeficiency; PC-3: prostate cancer cell-3; ADT: androgen depletion therapy; Tregs: regulatory T cells; PSA: prostate-specific androgen; PFS: progression-free survival; OS: overall survival; PD-1: programmed cell death protein-1

  53 in total

1.  Invasive breast cancer reprograms early myeloid differentiation in the bone marrow to generate immunosuppressive neutrophils.

Authors:  Amy-Jo Casbon; Damien Reynaud; Chanhyuk Park; Emily Khuc; Dennis D Gan; Koen Schepers; Emmanuelle Passegué; Zena Werb
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Prognostic significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Levent Sagnak; Hikmet Topaloglu; Ugur Ozok; Hamit Ersoy
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.872

3.  Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2013.

Authors:  Wanqing Chen; Rongshou Zheng; Siwei Zhang; Hongmei Zeng; Changfa Xia; Tingting Zuo; Zhixun Yang; Xiaonong Zou; Jie He
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 8.679

Review 4.  Tumor promoting role of anti-tumor macrophages in tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Kuntal Kanti Goswami; Tithi Ghosh; Sarbari Ghosh; Madhurima Sarkar; Anamika Bose; Rathindranath Baral
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.868

Review 5.  Diverse macrophages polarization in tumor microenvironment.

Authors:  Inmoo Rhee
Journal:  Arch Pharm Res       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.946

6.  High tissue density of FOXP3+ T cells is associated with clinical outcome in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Flammiger; Lars Weisbach; Hartwig Huland; Pierre Tennstedt; Ronald Simon; Sarah Minner; Carsten Bokemeyer; Guido Sauter; Thorsten Schlomm; Martin Trepel
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 7.  Inflammation, Microbiota, and Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Martin Puhr; Angelo De Marzo; William Isaacs; Marshall Scott Lucia; Karen Sfanos; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; Zoran Culig
Journal:  Eur Urol Focus       Date:  2016-08-28

Review 8.  Immunotherapy and therapeutic vaccines in prostate cancer: an update on current strategies and clinical implications.

Authors:  B Harpreet Singh; James L Gulley
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2014 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  FOXP3+ regulatory T cells in normal prostate tissue, postatrophic hyperplasia, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and tumor histological lesions in men with and without prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sabina Davidsson; Ove Andren; Anna-Lena Ohlson; Jessica Carlsson; Swen-Olof Andersson; Francesca Giunchi; Jennifer R Rider; Michelangelo Fiorentino
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 10.  Human FOXP3+ T regulatory cell heterogeneity.

Authors:  Audrey Mohr; Rajneesh Malhotra; Gaell Mayer; Guy Gorochov; Makoto Miyara
Journal:  Clin Transl Immunology       Date:  2018-01-30
View more
  5 in total

1.  Gene Regulation Network Analysis on Human Prostate Orthografts Highlights a Potential Role for the JMJD6 Regulon in Clinical Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Mario Cangiano; Magda Grudniewska; Mark J Salji; Matti Nykter; Guido Jenster; Alfonso Urbanucci; Zoraide Granchi; Bart Janssen; Graham Hamilton; Hing Y Leung; Inès J Beumer
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 2.  G-CSF/GM-CSF-induced hematopoietic dysregulation in the progression of solid tumors.

Authors:  Kai He; Xi Liu; Robert D Hoffman; Rong-Zhen Shi; Gui-Yuan Lv; Jian-Li Gao
Journal:  FEBS Open Bio       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.792

Review 3.  Focus on the tumor microenvironment: A seedbed for neuroendocrine prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hengfeng Zhou; Qiangrong He; Chao Li; Bassam Lutf Mohammed Alsharafi; Liang Deng; Zhi Long; Yu Gan
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-07-22

4.  Bioinformatics Analysis of GFAP as a Potential Key Regulator in Different Immune Phenotypes of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Wencheng Yao; Xiang Li; Zhankui Jia; Chaohui Gu; Zhibo Jin; Jun Wang; Bo Yuan; Jinjian Yang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Impacts of combining anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy and radiotherapy on the tumour immune microenvironment in a murine prostate cancer model.

Authors:  Yiannis Philippou; Hanna T Sjoberg; Emma Murphy; Said Alyacoubi; Keaton I Jones; Alex N Gordon-Weeks; Su Phyu; Eileen E Parkes; W Gillies McKenna; Alastair D Lamb; Uzi Gileadi; Vincenzo Cerundolo; David A Scheiblin; Stephen J Lockett; David A Wink; Ian G Mills; Freddie C Hamdy; Ruth J Muschel; Richard J Bryant
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.