Literature DB >> 31134728

Vectors with autonomy: what distinguishes animal-mediated nutrient transport from abiotic vectors?

Alexandra G McInturf1, Lea Pollack2, Louie H Yang3, Orr Spiegel4.   

Abstract

Animal movements are important drivers of nutrient redistribution that can affect primary productivity and biodiversity across various spatial scales. Recent work indicates that incorporating these movements into ecosystem models can enhance our ability to predict the spatio-temporal distribution of nutrients. However, the role of animal behaviour in animal-mediated nutrient transport (i.e. active subsidies) remains under-explored. Here we review the current literature on active subsidies to show how the behaviour of active subsidy agents makes them both ecologically important and qualitatively distinct from abiotic processes (i.e. passive subsidies). We first propose that animal movement patterns can create similar ecological effects (i.e. press and pulse disturbances) in recipient ecosystems, which can be equal in magnitude to or greater than those of passive subsidies. We then highlight three key behavioural features distinguishing active subsidies. First, organisms can transport nutrients counter-directionally to abiotic forces and potential energy gradients (e.g. upstream). Second, unlike passive subsidies, organisms respond to the patterns of nutrients that they generate. Third, animal agents interact with each other. The latter two features can form positive- or negative-feedback loops, creating patterns in space or time that can reinforce nutrient hotspots in places of mass aggregations and/or create lasting impacts within ecosystems. Because human-driven changes can affect both the space-use of active subsidy species and their composition at both population (i.e. individual variation) and community levels (i.e. species interactions), predicting patterns in nutrient flows under future modified environmental conditions depends on understanding the behavioural mechanisms that underlie active subsidies and variation among agents' contributions. We conclude by advocating for the integration of animal behaviour, animal movement data, and individual variation into future conservation efforts in order to provide more accurate and realistic assessments of changing ecosystem function.
© 2019 Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal behaviour; behavioural ecology; energy flow; mobile links; movement ecology; nutrient cycling; spatial subsidies

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31134728     DOI: 10.1111/brv.12525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc        ISSN: 0006-3231


  3 in total

1.  Seabird diversity and biomass enhance cross-ecosystem nutrient subsidies.

Authors:  Cassandra E Benkwitt; Peter Carr; Shaun K Wilson; Nicholas A J Graham
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Using aquatic animals as partners to increase yield and maintain soil nitrogen in the paddy ecosystems.

Authors:  Liang Guo; Lufeng Zhao; Junlong Ye; Zijun Ji; Jian-Jun Tang; Keyu Bai; Sijun Zheng; Liangliang Hu; Xin Chen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Scale-dependent effects of marine subsidies on the island biogeographic patterns of plants.

Authors:  Debora S Obrist; Owen T Fitzpatrick; Norah E M Brown; Patrick J Hanly; Wiebe Nijland; Luba Y Reshitnyk; Sara B Wickham; Chris T Darimont; John D Reynolds; Brian M Starzomski
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 3.167

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.