Katharina Angerpointner1, Antonio Ernstberger1, Katharina Bosch1, Florian Zeman2, Michael Koller2, Maximilian Kerschbaum3. 1. Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. 2. Center for Clinical Studies, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. 3. Department of Trauma Surgery, University Medical Center Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss Allee 11, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. maximilian.kerschbaum@ukr.de.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Besides mortality, the patient-reported outcome (PRO) in survivors of multiple trauma is of increasing interest. So far, no data on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after multiple trauma from an entire trauma network are available. Within this study, the course of the PRO over time and differences between level I and level II trauma centers within an entire trauma network was evaluated. METHODS: Multiple injured patients, treated in a rural trauma network over 2 years, were prospectively included in this study. After 6, 12 and 24 months the results of the European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) EQ-5D outcome instrument were evaluated. To adjust for differences in trauma severity between level I and level II centers, the Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II) and the Functional Capacity Index (FCI) were used to adjust the life-quality results of patients. RESULTS: 501 patients were included, 118 patients with an ISS < 16 points, 383 patients reached 16 points or more. Despite a steady increase of EQ-5D index over time (6 months: 0.71 ± 0.31; 12 months: 0.74 ± 0.28; 24 months: 0.76 ± 0.27; p < 0.001), the values of a reference population could not be reached even 2 years after trauma (EQ-5D reference population: 0.9). After adjustment for trauma severity, no significant differences in PROMs between level I and level II centers could be detected (p = 0.188). CONCLUSION: The consistently low EQ-5D index relative the reference population and the lack of a difference between level I and II centers suggest that improved strategies for polytrauma aftercare are called for.
PURPOSE: Besides mortality, the patient-reported outcome (PRO) in survivors of multiple trauma is of increasing interest. So far, no data on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after multiple trauma from an entire trauma network are available. Within this study, the course of the PRO over time and differences between level I and level II trauma centers within an entire trauma network was evaluated. METHODS: Multiple injured patients, treated in a rural trauma network over 2 years, were prospectively included in this study. After 6, 12 and 24 months the results of the European Quality of Life (EuroQoL) EQ-5D outcome instrument were evaluated. To adjust for differences in trauma severity between level I and level II centers, the Revised Injury Severity Classification II (RISC II) and the Functional Capacity Index (FCI) were used to adjust the life-quality results of patients. RESULTS: 501 patients were included, 118 patients with an ISS < 16 points, 383 patients reached 16 points or more. Despite a steady increase of EQ-5D index over time (6 months: 0.71 ± 0.31; 12 months: 0.74 ± 0.28; 24 months: 0.76 ± 0.27; p < 0.001), the values of a reference population could not be reached even 2 years after trauma (EQ-5D reference population: 0.9). After adjustment for trauma severity, no significant differences in PROMs between level I and level II centers could be detected (p = 0.188). CONCLUSION: The consistently low EQ-5D index relative the reference population and the lack of a difference between level I and II centers suggest that improved strategies for polytrauma aftercare are called for.
Entities:
Keywords:
EQ-5D; Multiple trauma; Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs); Polytrauma; Quality of Life (QoL); Trauma network
Authors: Jan C van Ditshuizen; Esther M M van Lieshout; Ed F van Beeck; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Dennis den Hartog Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2021-09-12 Impact factor: 2.374
Authors: Nike Walter; Markus Rupp; Katja Hierl; Christian Pfeifer; Maximilian Kerschbaum; Thilo Hinterberger; Volker Alt Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2021-05 Impact factor: 5.853