| Literature DB >> 31134027 |
Lisa Maudsdotter1, Yuri Ushijima1, Kazuya Morikawa1.
Abstract
Biofilms of S. aureus accumulate cells resistant to the antibiotic rifampicin. We show here that the accumulation of rifampicin resistant mutants (RifR) in biofilms is not equable but rather is a local event, suggesting that the growth of a few locally emerged mutants is responsible for this. Competition assays demonstrated that, compared to wild-type bacteria, the isolated RifR mutants have a growth advantage in biofilms, but not in planktonic culture. To gain insight into the mechanism of the growth advantage, we tested the involvement of the two-component systems (TCS) that sense and respond to environmental changes. We found that a deletion of SrrAB or NreBC has a drastic effect on the growth advantage of RifR mutants, suggesting the importance of oxygen/respiration responses. All six of the RifR isolates tested showed increased resistance to at least one of the common stresses found in the biofilm environment (i.e., oxidative, nitric acid, and organic acid stress). The RifR mutants also had a growth advantage in a biofilm flow model, which highlights the physiological relevance of our findings.Entities:
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus; biofilm; fitness; resistance; rifampicin
Year: 2019 PMID: 31134027 PMCID: PMC6514104 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00988
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
S. aureus strains and primers used in this study.
| Strain | Description | rifampicin MIC∗ | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N315 | Pre-MRSA, KmR | ≤0.0078 | wild -type∗∗ | |
| RifRl | Rifampicin resistant mutant of N315, from biofilm | >8 | substitution: A477D | This study |
| RifR2 | Rifampicin resistant mutant of N315, from biofilm | >8 | substitution: A477D | This study |
| RifR3 | Rifampicin resistant mutant of N315, from biofilm | >8 | none∗∗∗ | This study |
| RifR4 | Rifampicin resistant mutant of N315, from biofilm | 8 | none∗∗∗ | This study |
| RifR5 | Rifampicin resistant mutant of N315, from biofilm | 1 | S 486 A 487 to S 486 [L, S] A487 | This study |
| RifR6 | Rifampicin resistant mutant of N315, from biofilm | 1 | S 486 A 487 to S 486 [L, S] A487 | This study |
| RifRliql | Rifampicin resistant mutant of N315, from liquid culture | This study | ||
| RifRliq2 | Rifampicin resistant mutant of N315, from liquid culture | This study | ||
| N315ex | SCCmec cured derivative of N315, KmS | |||
| deltaSigB | This study | |||
| SA1869fl | AAGAATTCCCTACAGTTATTGTTGCGGC | This study | ||
| RsbU2 | TACCCGGGCAATTTTGCTGTAGATGA | This study | ||
| SA1869rl | TGCCCGGGCCATATAATTATCCCTTGA | This study | ||
| SA1869r2 | CTAGATCTGAACTTCATCTAGTCCACCAGT | This study | ||
| rpoB-F | AATATAGAATCGAAAATGGTGTCAT | This study | ||
| rpoB-R | CCTTCAATTTAGATTAGCTGTGCTAT | This study | ||
FIGURE 1Increased fitness of spontaneous RifR mutants in biofilm. (A) Aging biofilms of S. aureus accumulate RifR cells. (B) Distribution of the RifR cells in the biofilm. The biofilm disc was cut in sections and RifR cells were counted. (C,D) Fitness of the RifR mutants in biofilm environment. A small number of RifR mutants (kanamycin resistant) were inoculated in the center of a two-day-old biofilm of kanamycin sensitive bacteria (N315ex) and incubated for 7 days. RifR mutants (RifR1 ∼6) had increased viability in biofilm in comparison to the wild-type (N315).
FIGURE 2Nitrate (NO3-) and nitrite (NO2-) reduction. (A,B) Cells were grown in nitrate broth. (C,D) Cells were grown in nitrite broth. (A,C) ΔNreB/C. (B,D) Rifampicin resistant mutants. The average concentrations of nitrite were shown with standard deviations. Two of the RifR mutants (RifR5 and RifR6) had reduced nitrite reduction ability. ∗∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗p < 0.05, ∗p < 0.1, in t-test.
FIGURE 3Effect of the addition of nitrate or nitrite on the reduced viability of RifR mutants in aging liquid cultures. (A,B) The RifR mutants had reduced viability in aging liquid cultures in brain-heart infusion (BHI) medium (A) or in nutrient broth (NB) (B). (C) Addition of 40 mM nitrate diminishes the viability reduction in NB. (D) 1 mM nitrite confers increased viability to RifR cells relative to the wild-type. Mean relative viability and standard deviations compared to N315 is shown in all the graphs (n = 3).
FIGURE 4Resistance of rifampicin resistant mutants to hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide. (A) Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). (B) Nitric oxide (NO). Means and standard deviations of four (A) or three (B) independent experiments are shown. ∗∗p < 0.05, ∗p < 0.1, in t-test.
FIGURE 5Effects of organic acids on the growth of rifampicin resistant mutant. (A) Lactic acid, (B) Acetic acid, (C) Formic acid. The acids concentrations were 1 mM or 10 mM. Mean and standard error values of bacterial growth yields (OD600 after 16 h) are shown (n = 3). ∗∗p < 0.05, ∗p < 0.1, in t-test. See Supplementary Figure S3 for growth curves.
FIGURE 6High viability of RifR mutants in biofilm under flow. Mean and standard error values of relative viability are shown (n = 3). ∗∗p < 0.05, ∗p < 0.1 in t-test.