| Literature DB >> 31134004 |
Shiqiang Chen1,2,3, Hao Deng1, Guangzhou Liu1, Dun Zhang2,3.
Abstract
class="Chemical">Iron-oxidizing bacteria (<class="Chemical">span class="Chemical">IOB) and iron-reducing bacteria (IRB) can easily adhere onto carbon steel surface to form biofilm and affect corrosion processes. However, the mechanism of mixed consortium induced carbon steel corrosion is relatively underexplored. In this paper, the adsorptions of IOB (Mariprofundus ferrooxydans, M. f.), IRB (Thalassospira sp., T. sp.) and mixed consortium (M. f. and T. sp.) on surface of Q235 carbon steel and their effects on corrosion in seawater were investigated through surface analysis techniques and electrochemical methods. Results showed that local adhesion is a typical characteristic for biofilm on surface of Q235 carbon steel in M. f. and mixed consortium media, which induces localized corrosion of Q235 carbon steel. Corrosion rates of Q235 carbon steel in different culture media decrease in the order: r M.f. > r mixed consortium > r T. sp. > r sterile. The evolution of corrosion rate along with time decreases in M. f. medium, and increases then keeps table in both T. sp. and mixed consortium media. Corrosion mechanism of Q235 carbon steel in mixed consortium medium is discussed through analysis of surface morphology and composition, environmental parameter, and electrochemical behavior.Entities:
Keywords: EIS; Q235 carbon steel; SEM; XPS; microbiologically influenced corrosion
Year: 2019 PMID: 31134004 PMCID: PMC6517491 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00936
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
FIGURE 1The evolution of (A) pH and (B) concentration of dissolve oxygen in sterile, M. f., T. sp., and mixed consortium media along with time.
FIGURE 2The evolution of (A) OCP and (B) weight loss of Q235 carbon steel in sterile, M. f., T. sp., and mixed consortium media along with time.
FIGURE 3EIS, (A,C,E,G) Nyquist and (B,D,F,H) Bode plots, of Q235 carbon steel in sterile, M. f., T. sp., and mixed consortium media for (A,B) 1, (C,D) 4, (E,F) 7, and (G,H) 11 days.
FIGURE 4The equivalent circuit model used to fit the EIS data in Figure 3.
The fitting parameter of EIS data of Q235 carbon steel in sterile, M. f., T. sp., and mixed consortium media for different times.
| Time/medium | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 day | Sterile | 9.37 ± 0.07 | 1.21 ± 0.02 | 0.90 ± 0.003 | 22.60 ± 2.94 | 1.03 ± 0.22 | 0.98 ± 0.08 | 36.54 ± 4.46 |
| 5.81 ± 0.09 | 2.30 ± 0.52 | 0.82 ± 0.006 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 9.04 ± 0.16 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 13.63 ± 1.50 | ||
| 8.23 ± 0.10 | 3.77 ± 0.16 | 0.75 ± 0.004 | 1.32 ± 0.13 | 27.08 ± 1.07 | 0.75 ± 0.05 | 10.21 ± 0.05 | ||
| Mixed consortium | 7.23 ± 0.02 | 3.29 ± 0.07 | 0.90 ± 0.004 | 0.59 ± 0.08 | 8.21 ± 0.50 | 0.47 ± 0.03 | 4.55 ± 0.45 | |
| 4 days | Sterile | 9.29 ± 0.03 | 2.54 ± 0.02 | 0.91 ± 0.002 | 12.43 ± 1.26 | 1.43 ± 0.17 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 39.62 ± 3.78 |
| 6.10 ± 0.17 | 7.94 ± 0.07 | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 0.61 ± 0.05 | 23.49 ± 1.72 | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 5.10 ± 0.73 | ||
| 8.18 ± 0.06 | 1.47 ± 0.08 | 0.85 ± 0.07 | 0.41 ± 0.05 | 4.91 ± 0.08 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 14.41 ± 3.13 | ||
| Mixed consortium | 7.19 ± 0.04 | 5.74 ± 0.14 | 0.90 ± 0.005 | 0.83 ± 0.09 | 12.78 ± 0.95 | 0.60 ± 0.04 | 8.25 ± 1.84 | |
| 7 days | Sterile | 9.37 ± 0.03 | 3.33 ± 0.03 | 0.91 ± 0.002 | 8.65 ± 1.53 | 1.32 ± 0.18 | 0.66 ± 0.06 | 54.68 ± 5.44 |
| 6.25 ± 0.17 | 12.26 ± 0.69 | 0.55 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 27.38 ± 2.29 | 0.62 ± 0.01 | 4.55 ± 0.49 | ||
| 8.01 ± 0.08 | 6.81 ± 0.40 | 0.91 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 6.04 ± 0.37 | 0.84 ± 0.05 | 15.20 ± 1.52 | ||
| Mixed consortium | 7.14 ± 0.05 | 11.73 ± 1.98 | 0.92 ± 0.03 | 0.56 ± 0.09 | 22.43 ± 0.57 | 0.84 ± 0.03 | 8.87 ± 0.08 | |
| 11 days | Sterile | 9.29 ± 0.05 | 1.31 ± 0.11 | 0.92 ± 0.003 | 7.06 ± 0.68 | 3.02 ± 0.11 | 0.76 ± 0.01 | 56.20 ± 2.16 |
| 6.36 ± 0.14 | 18.38 ± 0.82 | 0.50 ± 0.007 | 0.71 ± 0.07 | 26.72 ± 2.81 | 0.60 ± 0.01 | 3.32 ± 0.57 | ||
| 8.90 ± 0.09 | 9.28 ± 0.92 | 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.50 ± 0.02 | 9.02 ± 0.95 | 0.87 ± 0.06 | 16.34 ± 1.38 | ||
| Mixed consortium | 6.65 ± 0.03 | 18.31 ± 1.49 | 0.92 ± 0.02 | 0.49 ± 0.05 | 25.41 ± 0.80 | 0.83 ± 0.02 | 9.02 ± 0.06 | |
FIGURE 5SEM images of Q235 carbon steel (A) before and (B) after removing corrosion products film in sterile medium for 11 days.
FIGURE 8SEM images of Q235 carbon steel (A–C) before and (E,F) after removing corrosion products film in mixed consortium medium for 11 days, and (D) elemental carbon distribution map.
FIGURE 6SEM images of Q235 carbon steel (A–C) before and (E) after removing corrosion products film in M. f. medium for 11 days, and (D) elemental carbon distribution map.
FIGURE 7SEM images of Q235 carbon steel (A) before and (B) after removing corrosion products film in T. sp. medium for 11 days.
FIGURE 9The XPS spectra of Q235 carbon steel in sterile, M. f., T. sp., and mixed consortium media for 11 days.
FIGURE 10The Fe 2p3/2 high resolution spectra of Q235 carbon steel in (A) sterile, (B) M. f., (C) T. sp., and (D) mixed consortium media for 11 days.
The RC of components of corrosion products on surface of Q235 carbon steel in sterile, M. f., T. sp., and mixed consortium media for 11 days.
| Components of corrosion products | Position (eV) | Sterile (At. %) | Mixed consortium (At. %) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fe3O4 | 710.15 | 42 | 27 | 66 | 38 |
| FeOOH | 711.5 | 29 | 43 | 18 | 41 |
| Fe2O3 | 712.8 | 29 | 30 | 16 | 21 |
FIGURE 11The corrosion mechanism model of Q235 carbon steel in mixed consortium medium.