| Literature DB >> 31133786 |
Yuexin Cai1,2, Suijun Chen1,2, Yanhong Chen1,2, Jiahong Li1,2, Chang-Dong Wang3, Fei Zhao4,5, Cai-Ping Dang6,7, Jianheng Liang8, Nannan He8, Maojin Liang1,2, Yiqing Zheng1,2.
Abstract
In order to clarify the central reorganization in acute period of hearing loss, this study explored the aberrant dynamics of electroencephalogram (EEG) microstates and the correlations with the features of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and tinnitus. We used high-density EEG with 128 channels to investigate alterations in microstate parameters between 25 ISSNHL patients with tinnitus and 27 healthy subjects. This study also explored the associations between microstate characteristics and tinnitus features. Microstates were clustered into four categories. There was a reduced presence of microstate A in amplitude, coverage, lifespan, frequency and an increased presence of microstate B in frequency in ISSNHL patients with tinnitus. According to the syntax analysis, a reduced transition from microstate C to microstate A and an increased transition from microstate C to microstate B were found in ISSNHL subjects. In addition, the significant negative correlations were found between Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) scores and frequency of microstate A as well as between THI scores and the probability of transition from microstate D to microstate A. While THI was positively correlated with the transition probability from microstate D to microstate B. To sum up, the significant differences in the characteristics of resting-state EEG microstates were found between ISSNHL subjects with tinnitus and healthy controls. This study suggests that the alterations of central neural networks occur in acute stage of hearing loss and tinnitus. And EEG microstate may be considered as a useful tool to study the whole brain network in ISSNHL patients.Entities:
Keywords: EEG; ISSNHL; mechanism; microstate; tinnitus
Year: 2019 PMID: 31133786 PMCID: PMC6514099 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurosci ISSN: 1662-453X Impact factor: 4.677
The landscape layout of ISSNHL participants with tinnitus.
| Patient | Gender | Age (years) | Tinnitus duration (days) | Tinnitus laterality | Tinnitus pitch (Hz) | Hearing thresholds (dB HL) (L/R) | THI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CJH | Female | 62 | 20 | Left | 125 | 95/19 | 34 |
| CYF | Female | 43 | 20 | Left | 4000 | 79/10 | 50 |
| DL | Male | 30 | 14 | Left | 8000 | 90/6 | 36 |
| FLX | Female | 61 | 7 | Right | 1000 | 31/81 | 58 |
| HJW | Female | 25 | 14 | Right | 1500 | 15/60 | 72 |
| HDR | Female | 63 | 7 | Right | 1000 | 53/112 | 78 |
| HST | Male | 42 | 7 | Left | 4000 | 80/25 | 26 |
| LMJ | Male | 54 | 14 | Right | 8000 | 25/110 | 62 |
| LGZ | Female | 58 | 10 | Right | 250 | 15/75 | 56 |
| LJH | Male | 51 | 20 | Right | 6000 | 47/56 | 26 |
| LRH | Female | 54 | 7 | Right | 6000 | 32/67 | 82 |
| LWY | Female | 49 | 7 | Right | 250 | 15/83 | 12 |
| LSK | Male | 46 | 25 | Bilateral | 2000/2000 | 58/63 | 26 |
| LC | Male | 47 | 2 | Right | 6000 | 19/81 | 12 |
| LQ | Female | 36 | 20 | Left | 125 | 110/9 | 58 |
| MY | Male | 41 | 7 | Right | 4000 | 38/68 | 4 |
| PGJ | Male | 51 | 20 | Bilateral | 4000/750 | 52/66 | 68 |
| SWL | Male | 42 | 10 | Left | 250 | 110/20 | 60 |
| WJD | Female | 57 | 20 | Left | 8000 | 110/22 | 52 |
| WWM | Female | 48 | 10 | Right | 1000 | 15/89 | 50 |
| XWY | Female | 17 | 14 | Right | 4000 | 8/81 | 16 |
| ZMY | Female | 18 | 10 | Right | 2000 | 20/83 | 48 |
| ZYT | Female | 41 | 8 | Right | 500 | 13/98 | 28 |
| ZXH | Female | 53 | 7 | Left | 6000 | 70/20 | 40 |
| ZJH | Female | 65 | 2 | Right | 4000 | 23/63 | 30 |
FIGURE 1The spatial configuration of the four microstates classes in two group. Microstate class orientations were: (A) right-frontal left-posterior; (B) left-frontal right-posterior; (C) anterior–posterior; (D) fronto-central extreme.
Comparison of the microstate analysis results in ISSNHL patients with tinnitus and control subjects.
| Class A | Class B | Class C | Class D | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control (Mean ± SD) | Tinnitus (Mean ± SD) | Control (Mean ± SD) | Tinnitus (Mean ± SD) | Control (Mean ± SD) | Tinnitus (Mean ± SD) | Control (Mean ± SD) | Tinnitus (Mean ± SD) | |
| Coverage (%) | 0.291 ± 0.227 | 0.149 ± 0.114∗ | 0.210 ± 0.241 | 0.296 ± 0.201 | 0.322 ± 0.235 | 0.371 ± 0.196 | 0.166 ± 0.212 | 0.179 ± 0.199 |
| Lifespan (ms) | 251.971 ± 142.799 | 170.686 ± 58.921∗ | 217.772 ± 175.857 | 247.793 ± 123.673 | 323.097 ± 315.186 | 307.430 ± 164.535 | 198.585 ± 128.154 | 190.289 ± 105.086 |
| Amplitude (uV) | 0.004 ± 0.081 | −0.043 ± 0.087∗ | −0.013 ± 0.310 | 0.015 ± 0.056 | 0.002 ± 0.062 | −0.006 ± 0.031 | −0.009 ± 0.169 | 0.059 ± 0.273 |
| Frequency | 1.022 ± 0.485 | 0.747 ± 0.448∗ | 0.715 ± 0.536 | 1.110 ± 0.360∗ | 1.045 ± 0.354 | 1.189 ± 0.272 | 0.615 ± 0.543 | 0.729 ± 0.513 |
FIGURE 2Schematic view of the syntax pattern. ∗ Indicates significant difference (p < 0.05). Solid arrow indicate significant correlation.
FIGURE 3Correlations between transitions of microstates and tinnitus subjective symptoms. ∗ Indicates significant difference (p < 0.05). Solid arrow indicate significant correlation.
Correlations between changes of microstates and THI in ISSNHL patients with tinnitus.
| THI scores | Microstate A R-value | Microstate B R-value | Microstate C R-value | Microstate D R-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage (%) | −0.358 | 0.197 | −0.228 | 0.230 |
| Lifespan (ms) | −0.235 | 0.137 | −0.192 | 0.147 |
| Amplitude (uV) | 0.000 | −0.411∗ | 0.053 | −0.117 |
| Frequency | −0.417∗ | 0.223 | −0.193 | 0.257 |