Literature DB >> 31133524

Honesty and comfort levels in mothers when screened for perinatal depression and anxiety.

Peta M Forder1, Jane Rich2, Sheree Harris3, Catherine Chojenta4, Nicole Reilly5, Marie-Paule Austin6, Deborah Loxton7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the degree of honesty and level of comfort reported by women when questioned about their emotional wellbeing during the perinatal period; to investigate if honesty and comfort are associated with perinatal depression or perinatal anxiety; and to examine the reasons why women may not always respond honestly.
METHODS: Qualitative and quantitative data from 1597 women from the cross-sectional perinatal mental health substudy (part of the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health) were analysed using a mixed methods approach.
RESULTS: When questioned by their health practitioner about their emotional wellbeing in the perinatal period, 20.7% of women indicated they had not always responded honestly. Reasons for not being honest reflected four main themes: normalizing of symptoms/coping; negative perceptions (self-and others); fear of adverse repercussions; and fear of involvement of health services (trust and confidentiality). The 38.9% of women who did not feel comfortable when questioned by their health practitioner about their emotional wellbeing were four times more likely to report perinatal depression (odds ratio = 4.09; 95% confidence interval = 2.55, 6.57) and nearly twice as likely to report perinatal anxiety (odds ratio = 1.90; 95% confidence interval = 1.24, 2.94) than other women.
CONCLUSIONS: Women who are most likely to need mental health care during the perinatal period are also those least likely to be honest about their mental health. A non-judgemental, open and reassuring approach by clinicians may help to reduce the stigma and fears contributing to lack of honest responses, and improve early diagnosis and treatment of mental health problems.
Copyright © 2019 Australian College of Midwives. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrier; Honesty; Perinatal anxiety; Perinatal depression; Screening

Year:  2019        PMID: 31133524     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  8 in total

1.  A qualitative analysis of feelings and experiences associated with perinatal distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Katie Jones; Virginia Harrison; Michelle L Moulds; Lisa Lazard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.105

2.  Psychological risks to mother-infant bonding during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Cindy H Liu; Sunah Hyun; Leena Mittal; Carmina Erdei
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 3.953

3.  Preferences for mental health treatment for post-partum depression among new mothers.

Authors:  Meital Simhi; Orly Sarid; Julie Cwikel
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2019-12-05

4.  Attitudes and Engagement of Pregnant and Postnatal Women With a Web-Based Emotional Health Tool (Mummatters): Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Nicole Reilly; Marie-Paule Austin
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Estimation of postpartum depression risk from electronic health records using machine learning.

Authors:  Guy Amit; Irena Girshovitz; Karni Marcus; Yiye Zhang; Jyotishman Pathak; Vered Bar; Pinchas Akiva
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Perceived social support on postpartum mental health:  An instrumental variable analysis.

Authors:  John Nkwoma Inekwe; Evelyn Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  'Next Stop: Mum': Evaluation of a Postpartum Depression Prevention Strategy in Poland.

Authors:  Magdalena Chrzan-Dętkoś; Natalia Murawska; Tamara Walczak-Kozłowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Opening the door: midwives' perceptions of two models of psychosocial assessment in pregnancy- a mixed methods study.

Authors:  V Schmied; N Reilly; E Black; D Kingston; K Talcevska; V Mule; M-P Austin
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.