Literature DB >> 31132517

Efficiency of medical service systems in the rural areas of Mainland China: a comparative study from 2013 to 2017.

D Zheng1, J Gong2, C Zhang3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Inefficient rural medical service systems are one of major obstacles to the Deepening Healthcare Reform. The objectives of this work are to analyze the efficiency of China's rural medical service systems and explore the key related factors. STUDY
DESIGN: Two-stage study including measuring efficiency and identifying factors.
METHODS: An output-oriented slacks-based data envelopment analysis model was used to measure the efficiency, and a Spearman rank correlation analysis and a multiple linear regression model were used to explore the factors.
RESULTS: For the village-level medical service system, 20 out of 27 provinces were inefficient in 2013-2017, 12 out of 27 provinces had the efficiency lower than the average scores in 2013-2017 (0.633, 0.659, 0.638, 0.603, and 0.589), Guangdong had the highest scores of 1 in 2014-2017, whereas Tibet had the lowest scores (0.064-0.083) in 2013-2017, and the west region performed worst. For the township-level medical service system, 11 out of 27 provinces were inefficient in 2013-2017, 10 out of 27 provinces had the efficiency lower than the average scores in 2013-2017 (0.819, 0.791, 0.757, 0.787, and 0.811), Ningxia had the highest efficiency of 1 in 2013-2017, whereas Jilin had the lowest efficiency (0.313-0.370), and the central region performed worst. Additionally, rural residents' income was positively associated with the efficiency of village-level medical services, while the proportion of the vulnerable population was positively associated with the efficiency of township-level medical services.
CONCLUSIONS: Most provinces had inefficient rural medical service systems in 2013-2017. The efficiency scores varied greatly across provinces, and most scores changed a little over time. Imbalances in the development of rural medical service systems existed across regions, and the efficiency of village-level medical services and township-level medical services was associated with different factors.
Copyright © 2019 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China's rural medical service systems; DEA; Efficiency

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31132517     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.04.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  5 in total

1.  Determining Factors Affecting the Users' Participation of Online Health Communities: An Integrated Framework of Social Capital and Social Support.

Authors:  Xiu-Fu Tian; Run-Ze Wu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-14

2.  Cardiovascular surgery experience does not significantly improve patients' response to stroke.

Authors:  Shengde Li; Li-Ying Cui; Craig Anderson; Chunpeng Gao; Chengdong Yu; Guangliang Shan; Longde Wang; Bin Peng
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 3.  The Core of Healthcare Efficiency: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Review on Frontier Analysis of Hospitals.

Authors:  Thyago Celso Cavalcante Nepomuceno; Luca Piubello Orsini; Victor Diogho Heuer de Carvalho; Thiago Poleto; Chiara Leardini
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-15

4.  Grandchild care, inadequate medical insurance protection, and inequalities in socioeconomic factors exacerbate childhood obesity in China.

Authors:  Jing Yang; Yun Shen; Yue Deng; Zangyi Liao
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-08-25

5.  Public Health Services, Health Human Capital, and Relative Poverty of Rural Families.

Authors:  Yingya Yang; Liangliang Zhou; Chongmei Zhang; Xin Luo; Yihan Luo; Wei Wang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 4.614

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.