Florent Tixier1, Hyemin Um1, Robert J Young2,3, Harini Veeraraghavan1. 1. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA. 3. Brain Tumor Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The use of radiomic features as biomarkers of treatment response and outcome or as correlates to genomic variations requires that the computed features are robust and reproducible. Segmentation, a crucial step in radiomic analysis, is a major source of variability in the computed radiomic features. Therefore, we studied the impact of tumor segmentation variability on the robustness of MRI radiomic features. METHOD: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1WICE ) MRI of 90 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma were segmented using a semiautomatic algorithm and an interactive segmentation with two different raters. We analyzed the robustness of 108 radiomic features from five categories (intensity histogram, gray-level co-occurrence matrix, gray-level size-zone matrix (GLSZM), edge maps, and shape) using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman analysis. RESULTS: Our results show that both segmentation methods are reliable with ICC ≥ 0.96 and standard deviation (SD) of mean differences between the two raters (SDdiffs ) ≤ 30%. Features computed from the histogram and co-occurrence matrices were found to be the most robust (ICC ≥ 0.8 and SDdiffs ≤ 30% for most features in these groups). Features from GLSZM were shown to have mixed robustness. Edge, shape, and GLSZM features were the most impacted by the choice of segmentation method with the interactive method resulting in more robust features than the semiautomatic method. Finally, features computed from T1WICE and FLAIR images were found to have similar robustness when computed with the interactive segmentation method. CONCLUSION: Semiautomatic and interactive segmentation methods using two raters are both reliable. The interactive method produced more robust features than the semiautomatic method. We also found that the robustness of radiomic features varied by categories. Therefore, this study could help motivate segmentation methods and feature selection in MRI radiomic studies.
PURPOSE: The use of radiomic features as biomarkers of treatment response and outcome or as correlates to genomic variations requires that the computed features are robust and reproducible. Segmentation, a crucial step in radiomic analysis, is a major source of variability in the computed radiomic features. Therefore, we studied the impact of tumor segmentation variability on the robustness of MRI radiomic features. METHOD: Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1WICE ) MRI of 90 patients diagnosed with glioblastoma were segmented using a semiautomatic algorithm and an interactive segmentation with two different raters. We analyzed the robustness of 108 radiomic features from five categories (intensity histogram, gray-level co-occurrence matrix, gray-level size-zone matrix (GLSZM), edge maps, and shape) using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland and Altman analysis. RESULTS: Our results show that both segmentation methods are reliable with ICC ≥ 0.96 and standard deviation (SD) of mean differences between the two raters (SDdiffs ) ≤ 30%. Features computed from the histogram and co-occurrence matrices were found to be the most robust (ICC ≥ 0.8 and SDdiffs ≤ 30% for most features in these groups). Features from GLSZM were shown to have mixed robustness. Edge, shape, and GLSZM features were the most impacted by the choice of segmentation method with the interactive method resulting in more robust features than the semiautomatic method. Finally, features computed from T1WICE and FLAIR images were found to have similar robustness when computed with the interactive segmentation method. CONCLUSION: Semiautomatic and interactive segmentation methods using two raters are both reliable. The interactive method produced more robust features than the semiautomatic method. We also found that the robustness of radiomic features varied by categories. Therefore, this study could help motivate segmentation methods and feature selection in MRI radiomic studies.
Authors: Sarthak Pati; Ruchika Verma; Hamed Akbari; Michel Bilello; Virginia B Hill; Chiharu Sako; Ramon Correa; Niha Beig; Ludovic Venet; Siddhesh Thakur; Prashant Serai; Sung Min Ha; Geri D Blake; Russell Taki Shinohara; Pallavi Tiwari; Spyridon Bakas Journal: Med Phys Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: N M H Verbakel; A Ibrahim; M L Smidt; H C Woodruff; R W Y Granzier; J E van Timmeren; T J A van Nijnatten; R T H Leijenaar; M B I Lobbes Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-08-25 Impact factor: 4.379