Literature DB >> 31131850

A Novel Technical Protocol for Improved Capture of the Genicular Nerves by Radiofrequency Ablation.

Aaron Conger1, Daniel M Cushman1, Kortnie Walker1, Russell Petersen1, David R Walega2, Richard Kendall1, Zachary L McCormick1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fluoroscopically guided cooled genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is an increasingly performed procedure for chronic, refractory knee pain due to osteoarthritis. Traditionally, partial sensory denervation has been accomplished through ablation of the superomedial, superolateral, and inferomedial genicular nerves. However, recent cadaveric studies have demonstrated additional sensory nerves and significant anatomic variation that impact current protocols.
OBJECTIVE: We describe an updated cooled genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation protocol that accounts for varied nerve location of the superomedial, superolateral, and inferomedial genicular nerves, as well as capture of the terminal articular branches of the nerves to the vastus intermedius, vastus lateralis, and vastus medialis. Furthermore, we describe an adjusted technique for inferomedial genicular nerve capture that mitigates the risk of pes anserine tendon injury.
DESIGN: Technical report and brief literature review.
METHODS: Cadaveric studies relating to the sensory innervation of the anterior knee joint were reviewed, and a more accurate and comprehensive cooled genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (CRFA) protocol is proposed.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on recent, rigorous anatomic dissections of the knee, the proposed genicular nerve CRFA protocol will provide more complete sensory denervation and potentially improve clinical outcomes. Prospective studies will be needed to confirm the hypothesis that this protocol will result in improved effectiveness and safety of genicular nerve RFA.
© 2019 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Conservative; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Pain; RFA

Year:  2019        PMID: 31131850     DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnz124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  5 in total

1.  Reflections on Innovative Interventional Pain-Relieving Procedures: Lessons Learned from Previous Mistakes.

Authors:  Zirong Zhao; Thomas M Larkin; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 2.  Motor-Sparing Neural Ablation with Modified Techniques for Knee Pain: Case Series on Knee Osteoarthritis and Updated Review of the Underlying Anatomy and Available Techniques.

Authors:  Tony Kwun-Tung Ng; King Hei Stanley Lam; Abdallah El-Sayed Allam
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Cooled Radiofrequency Ablation Provides Prolonged Pain Relief Compared to Traditional Radiofrequency Ablation: A Real-World, Large Retrospective Clinical Comparison from a Single Practice.

Authors:  Leonardo Kapural; Amela Minerali; Matthew Sanders; Matejic Matea; Simran Dua
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 2.832

4.  Predictive factors associated with successful response to utrasound guided genicular radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Selin Guven Kose; Halil Cihan Kose; Feyza Celikel; Omer Taylan Akkaya
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2022-10-01

5.  Is preoperative genicular radiofrequency ablation effective for reducing pain following total knee arthroplasty? A pilot randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Puneet Mishra; David Edwards; Marc Huntoon; Christopher Sobey; Gregory Polkowski; John Corey; Kelly Louise Mishra; Andrew Shinar; Stephen Engstrom; Cassandra Palmer; Stephen Bruehl
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 5.564

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.