Literature DB >> 31131714

Assessment of replicate numbers for titrating avian influenza virus using dose-response models.

Erica Spackman1,2, Sasidhar Malladi1,2, Amos Ssematimba1,2, Christopher B Stephens1,2.   

Abstract

Embryonating chicken eggs (ECEs) are among the most sensitive laboratory host systems for avian influenza virus (AIV) titration, but ECEs are expensive and require space for storage and incubation. Therefore, reducing ECE use would conserve resources. We utilized statistical modeling to evaluate the accuracy and precision of AIV titration with 3 instead of 5 ECEs for each dilution by the Reed-Muench method for 50% endpoint calculation. Beta-Poisson and exponential dose-response models were used in a simulation study to evaluate observations from actual titration data from 18 AIV isolates. The reproducibility among replicates of a titration was evaluated with one AIV isolate titrated in 3 replicates with the beta-Poisson, exponential, and Weibull dose-response models. The standard deviation (SD) of the error between input and estimated virus titers was estimated with Monte Carlo simulations using the fitted dose-response models. Good fit was observed with all models that were utilized. Reducing the number of ECEs per dilution from 5 to 3 resulted in the width of the 95% confidence interval increasing from ±0.64 to ±0.75 log10 50% ECE infectious doses (EID50) and the SD of the error increased by 0.03 log10 EID50. Our study suggests that using fewer ECEs per dilution is a viable approach that will allow laboratories to reduce costs and improve efficiency.

Entities:  

Keywords:  avian influenza virus; embryonating chicken egg titration; virus quantification

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31131714      PMCID: PMC6857022          DOI: 10.1177/1040638719853851

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest        ISSN: 1040-6387            Impact factor:   1.279


  8 in total

1.  Dose-response relationships for foot and mouth disease in cattle and sheep.

Authors:  N P French; L Kelly; R Jones; D Clancy
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  VARIANCE ESTIMATION IN THE REED-MUENCH FIFTY PER CENT END-POINT DETERMINATION.

Authors:  W F BROWN
Journal:  Am J Hyg       Date:  1964-01

3.  Evaluation and attempted optimization of avian embryos and cell culture methods for efficient isolation and propagation of low pathogenicity avian influenza viruses.

Authors:  Kira A Moresco; David E Stallknecht; David E Swayne
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.577

4.  Sampling variation of the fifty percent end-point, determined by the Reed-Muench (Behrens) method.

Authors:  M PIZZI
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1950-09       Impact factor: 0.553

5.  SLDAssay: A software package and web tool for analyzing limiting dilution assays.

Authors:  Ilana M Trumble; Andrew G Allmon; Nancie M Archin; Joseph Rigdon; Owen Francis; Pedro L Baldoni; Michael G Hudgens
Journal:  J Immunol Methods       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Avian influenza virus isolation, propagation, and titration in embryonated chicken eggs.

Authors:  Erica Spackman; Mary Lea Killian
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2014

7.  Dilution assay statistics.

Authors:  L E Myers; L J McQuay; F B Hollinger
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of different embryonating bird eggs and cell cultures for isolation efficiency of avian influenza A virus and avian paramyxovirus serotype 1 from real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-positive wild bird surveillance samples.

Authors:  Kira A Moresco; David E Stallknecht; David E Swayne
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.279

  8 in total
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of the 50% Infectious Dose of Human Norovirus Cin-2 in Gnotobiotic Pigs: A Comparison of Classical and Contemporary Methods for Endpoint Estimation.

Authors:  Ashwin K Ramesh; Viviana Parreño; Philip J Schmidt; Shaohua Lei; Weiming Zhong; Xi Jiang; Monica B Emelko; Lijuan Yuan
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 5.048

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.