Literature DB >> 31131618

Dealing with the remaining controversies of probiotic safety.

M van den Nieuwboer1, E Claassen1.   

Abstract

A clear safety profile of probiotics in clinical practice is essential in decision-making for all stakeholders and regulators. Probiotics have been investigated in different target populations, conditions and age groups. This also includes the use of probiotics in critically ill patients. Despite promising results reported with the use of probiotics and synbiotics, there is still a lively discussion regarding the proper and safe use of probiotics among physicians, researchers and regulators. This doubt and debate was sparked by the high incidence in mortality reported in a study with critically ill patients. Whereas no causal relationship has been established since, safety of probiotic has been questioned. In response, an overwhelming body of evidence suggesting that probiotics are safe has been compiled. Moreover, data indicates that probiotics reduce the number of adverse events compared to the control. However, due to a lack of standardised safety reporting in clinical studies, a strong evidence base on probiotic safety remains to be established. Here, we will discuss: (1) the rationale for using probiotics in the critically ill; (2) what happened during the Dutch Pancreatitis trial; (3) what are the known safety risks of probiotics based on the available data; and finally (4) how standardisation in safety reporting can drive probiotic innovation. Building a strong safety profile for probiotic strains will solidify its use in individuals that can benefit the most from microbial modulation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PROPATRIA; acute pancreatitis; probiotics; safety; safety reporting

Year:  2019        PMID: 31131618     DOI: 10.3920/BM2018.0159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Benef Microbes        ISSN: 1876-2883            Impact factor:   4.205


  5 in total

Review 1.  Probiotics, their prophylactic and therapeutic applications in human health development: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Bantayehu Addis Tegegne; Bekalu Kebede
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-06-22

Review 2.  Probiotics, Photobiomodulation, and Disease Management: Controversies and Challenges.

Authors:  Laura Marinela Ailioaie; Gerhard Litscher
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 3.  The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics (ISAPP) consensus statement on the definition and scope of synbiotics.

Authors:  Kelly S Swanson; Glenn R Gibson; Robert Hutkins; Raylene A Reimer; Gregor Reid; Kristin Verbeke; Karen P Scott; Hannah D Holscher; Meghan B Azad; Nathalie M Delzenne; Mary Ellen Sanders
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-08-21       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 4.  Evaluating the Role of Probiotics in the Prevention and Management of Age-Related Diseases.

Authors:  Despoina E Kiousi; Antonia Z Kouroutzidou; Konstantinos Neanidis; Dimitrios Matthaios; Aglaia Pappa; Alex Galanis
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Probiotic in the prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients: evidence from meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Yue-Chen Sun; Chen-Yi Wang; Hai-Li Wang; Yao Yuan; Jian-Hong Lu; Lei Zhong
Journal:  BMC Pulm Med       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.320

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.