| Literature DB >> 31131409 |
Maarten R Hillen1,2, Eleni Chouri1,2, Maojie Wang3, Sofie L M Blokland1,2, Sarita A Y Hartgring1,2, Arno N Concepcion2, Aike A Kruize2, Boudewijn M T Burgering3, Marzia Rossato1,2,4, Joel A G van Roon1,2, Timothy R D J Radstake1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: A considerable body of evidence supports a role for type-I IFN in the pathogenesis of primary SS (pSS). As plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are a major source of type-I IFN, we investigated their molecular regulation by measuring expression of a large set of miRNAs.Entities:
Keywords: Sjögren’s syndrome; microRNAs; plasmacytoid dendritic cells; type-I interferon
Year: 2019 PMID: 31131409 PMCID: PMC6880856 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez195
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) ISSN: 1462-0324 Impact factor: 7.580
Donor characteristics
| Discovery cohort | Replication cohort | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HC | pSS | HC | pSS | |
|
| 5 (0/5) | 14 (1/13) | 11 (1/10) | 16 (0/16) |
| Age (years) | 58 (54–67) | 56 (29–70) | 53 (29–64) | 52 (26–70) |
| LFS (foci/4 mm2) | – | 2.1 (1.0–5.0) | – | 2.0 (1.0–4.0) |
| ESSDAI | – | 2 (0–19) | – | 5 (0–13) |
| ESSPRI | – | 5 (2–9) | – | 5 (1–8) |
| Schirmer (mm/5 min) | – | 5 (0–15) | – | 7 (0–30) |
| ANA [no. positive (%)] | – | 11 (79) | – | 14 (93) |
| SSA [no. positive (%)] | – | 8 (57) | – | 13 (82) |
| SSB [no. positive (%)] | – | 4 (29) | – | 10 (63) |
| Serum IgG (g/l) | – | 14 (8–30) | – | 18 (9–33) |
Values are median (range) unless stated otherwise. HC: healthy control; pSS: primary SS; LFS: lymphocytic focus score; ESSDAI: EULAR SS disease activity index; ESSPRI: EULAR SS patient reported index; SSA: anti-SSA/Ro; SSB: anti-SSB/La.
. 1miRNAs consistently dysregulated in pSS pDCs target genes in pathways crucial for pDC function
Overview of the discovery and validation approach (A). Expression of 758 miRNA was measured in isolated pDCs from donors in the discovery cohort. We selected miRNAs different between pSS and HC with a FC of 0.5 < FC > 2.0 and a P-value of <0.05 for potential follow-up, which included 26 miRNAs (B). miRNAs that met the set thresholds are coloured in green for those expressed at lower level in patients compared with controls; red dots represent miRNAs expressed at a higher level in patients. Based on quality-control and expression level, 14 miRNAs were selected to be measured in the replication cohort using a custom quantitative PCR-based array. Of these, 10 miRNAs were significantly differentially expressed. Data from the replication cohort are depicted in (C). Functional annotation of the targets of the replicated miRNAs indicates their regulation of relevant pathways in pDCs, including apoptosis and PI3K-AKT-mTOR signalling (D). Medians ± IQR are shown. * indicates P < 0.05. Akt: Ak strain transforming; pDC: plasmacytoid dendritic cells; pSS: primary SS; HC: healthy control; FC: fold change; PI3K: phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; mTOR: mammalian target of rapamycin.
miRNAs differentially expressed in purified pDCs from patients with pSS
| Discovery | Replication | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Target | Fold-change |
| Fold-change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| miR-340# | 0.32 | 0.022 | 0.45 | 0.071 |
| miR-29b | 0.50 | 0.004 | 0.51 | 0.134 |
| miR-30e-3p | 0.30 | 0.010 | 0.65 | 0.057 |
| miR-30d | 0.30 | 0.001 | 0.73 | 0.318 |
| miR-362-3p | 0.31 | 0.001 | – | – |
| miR-181a-2# | 0.37 | 0.015 | – | – |
| miR-502-3p | 0.44 | 0.003 | – | – |
| miR-125b | 0.46 | 0.014 | – | – |
| miR-16 | 0.48 | 0.002 | – | – |
| miR-15a | 0.49 | 0.018 | – | – |
Expression of 758 miRNAs was measured in the discovery cohort using the OpenArray platform. Twenty miRNAs were differentially expressed in pSS patients as compared with healthy donors with a relative fold-change of ≤0.5 or ≥2.0 and a P-value of P < 0.05. Expression of 14 miRNAs was measured in the independent replication cohort using a custom Taqman-based array. Ten miRNAs were significantly different between patients and controls (P < 0.05) in the replication cohort and are shown in bold. pDCs: plasmacytoid dendritic cells; pSS: primary SS.
. 2Identification of novel protein targets of miR-29a and miR-29c using SILAC
HEK-293T cells were pre-cultured in culture medium supplemented with light- or heavy-isotope labelled amino acids to achieve steady-state labelling. Then, cells were transfected with a mimic for miR-29a, a mimic for miR-29c or an SCR for 48 h. Cells were washed and lysed. Light- and heavy-isotope medium cultured cells were mixed in two combinations per mimic (mimic in light and SCR in heavy; SCR in light and SCR in heavy) and separated into 20 fractions using ultra-performance liquid chromatography. Peptides in each fraction were identified by mass spectrometry. Peptides consistently downregulated by the miRNA mimic in both mixes with a fold-change of >|0.3| (in green) were selected (A). We compared the selected peptides to a list of in silico-predicted targets to identify the likely targets of miR-29a and miR-29c (B). Of these targets, five were common between the two miRs (C). SCR: scramble control; SILAC: stable isotope labelling with amino acids in cell culture.
Protein targets downregulated by miR-29a or miR-29c in the SILAC with a seed-region for the respective miRNA
| Protein | Ratio SCR/29a (Log2) | Ratio 29a/SCR (Log2) | Protein | Ratio SCR/29c (Log2) | Ratio 29c/SCR (Log2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.87 | −1.02 |
| 0.37 | −1.33 |
|
| 0.52 | −0.56 |
| 0.56 | −0.33 |
|
| 0.51 | −1.43 |
| 0.89 | −0.74 |
|
| 0.51 | −0.58 |
| 0.43 | −0.33 |
|
| 0.47 | −1.78 |
| 0.36 | −0.53 |
| CDK6 | 0.69 | −1.04 | LAMC1 | 0.54 | −0.53 |
| DCP2 | 0.46 | −0.47 | ESPNL | 0.49 | −0.63 |
| CTDSPL2 | 0.44 | −0.32 | EDEM3 | 0.47 | −0.32 |
| RNF138 | 0.44 | −0.56 | SPDL1 | 0.47 | −0.30 |
| LIMS1 | 0.43 | −0.42 | ABHD5 | 0.41 | −0.47 |
| SHPRH | 0.38 | −0.78 | STC2 | 0.33 | −0.32 |
| LEMD2 | 0.37 | −0.53 | SERPINB9 | 0.32 | −0.32 |
| MAZ | 0.36 | −0.49 | MLLT11 | 0.31 | −0.49 |
| KCTD5 | 0.36 | −0.47 | |||
| WDFY1 | 0.35 | −0.37 | |||
| PPT1 | 0.35 | −0.33 | |||
| ARHGAP19 | 0.34 | −0.35 | |||
| CCNA2 | 0.34 | −0.44 | |||
| SLC39A10 | 0.34 | −0.50 | |||
| CBX2 | 0.34 | −0.63 | |||
| PAN2 | 0.34 | −0.62 | |||
| AP3M2 | 0.31 | −0.42 | |||
| TMTC3 | 0.31 | −0.32 | |||
| ZBTB10 | 0.31 | −0.40 |
SILAC was performed for miR-29a and miR-29c and differences in expression between the scramble-control (SCR) and miRNA mimic are shown. Targets downregulated by the miRNA mimic compared with the SCR in both modes (miR/SCR and SCR/miR) that were also a predicted target of the respective miRNA were included. Targets with a ratio above |0.3| in both modes were selected as target and depicted here; targets common between both miRs are shown in bold. SILAC: stable isotope labelling with amino acids in cell culture.