Literature DB >> 31131401

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance techniques for tissue characterization after acute myocardial injury.

Ahmet Demirkiran1, Henk Everaars1, Raquel P Amier1, Casper Beijnink2, Michiel J Bom1, Marco J W Götte1, Ramon B van Loon1, Jasper L Selder1, Albert C van Rossum1, Robin Nijveldt1,2.   

Abstract

The annual incidence of hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction lies between 90 and 312 per 100 000 inhabitants in Europe. Despite advances in patient care 1 year mortality after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains around 10%. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has emerged as a robust imaging modality for assessing patients after acute myocardial injury. In addition to accurate assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes, CMR offers the unique ability of visualization of myocardial injury through a variety of imaging techniques such as late gadolinium enhancement and T2-weighted imaging. Furthermore, new parametric mapping techniques allow accurate quantification of myocardial injury and are currently being exploited in large trials aiming to augment risk management and treatment of STEMI patients. Of interest, CMR enables the detection of microvascular injury (MVI) which occurs in approximately 40% of STEMI patients and is a major independent predictor of mortality and heart failure. In this article, we review traditional and novel CMR techniques used for myocardial tissue characterization after acute myocardial injury, including the detection and quantification of MVI. Moreover, we discuss clinical scenarios of acute myocardial injury in which the tissue characterization techniques can be applied and we provide proposed imaging protocols tailored to each scenario. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author(s) 2019. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acute myocardial infarction; cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; infarct tissue characterization; intramyocardial haemorrhage; microvascular injury

Year:  2019        PMID: 31131401     DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez094

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 2047-2404            Impact factor:   6.875


  11 in total

1.  Multimodal Multiparametric Three-dimensional Image Fusion in Coronary Artery Disease: Combining the Best of Two Worlds.

Authors:  Jochen von Spiczak; Manoj Mannil; Hanna Model; Chris Schwemmer; Sebastian Kozerke; Frank Ruschitzka; Hatem Alkadhi; Robert Manka
Journal:  Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging       Date:  2020-04-16

2.  The diagnostic value of SPECT CZT quantitative myocardial blood flow in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Evgeniy A Nesterov; Konstantin V Zavadovsky; Andrew V Mochula; Alina N Maltseva; Alla A Boshchenko; Andrew E Baev; Sergey L Andreev; Riccardo Liga; Alessia Gimelli
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  PET 18F-flurpridaz quantitative measurements of myocardial blood flow: Added value for diagnosis of coronary artery disease? Of course!

Authors:  Henry Gewirtz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Imaging Findings of COVID-19-Related Cardiovascular Complications.

Authors:  Eleni Nakou; Estefania De Garate; Kate Liang; Matthew Williams; Dudley J Pennell; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci
Journal:  Card Electrophysiol Clin       Date:  2021-10-30

5.  Value of Fast MVO Identification From Contrast-Enhanced Cine (CE-SSFP) Combined With Myocardial Strain in Predicting Adverse Events in Patients After ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Yuan Lu; Zhi Li; Yameng Shao; Lei Chen; Yu Yang; Jianning Xi; Minglong Chen; Tingbo Jiang
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-21

6.  High relaxivity Gd3+-based organic nanoparticles for efficient magnetic resonance angiography.

Authors:  Zhuang Liu; Menglong Zhao; Han Wang; Zi Fu; Hongbo Gao; Weijun Peng; Dalong Ni; Wei Tang; Yajia Gu
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 10.435

7.  Left ventricular function, strain, and infarct characteristics in patients with transient ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction compared to ST-segment and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarctions.

Authors:  Ahmet Demirkiran; Nina W van der Hoeven; Gladys N Janssens; Jorrit S Lemkes; Henk Everaars; Peter M van de Ven; Nikki van Pouderoijen; Yvonne J M van Cauteren; Maarten A H van Leeuwen; Alexander Nap; Paul F Teunissen; Luuk H G A Hopman; Sebastiaan C A M Bekkers; Martijn W Smulders; Niels van Royen; Albert C van Rossum; Lourens F H J Robbers; Robin Nijveldt
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 9.130

Review 8.  Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: the future is bright.

Authors:  Karthik Seetharam; Stamatios Lerakis
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2019-09-13

Review 9.  The role of cardiovascular imaging for myocardial injury in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Bernard Cosyns; Stijn Lochy; Maria Luiza Luchian; Alessia Gimelli; Gianluca Pontone; Sabine D Allard; Johan de Mey; Peter Rosseel; Marc Dweck; Steffen E Petersen; Thor Edvardsen
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 10.  Role of computed tomography in COVID-19.

Authors:  Gianluca Pontone; Stefano Scafuri; Maria Elisabetta Mancini; Cecilia Agalbato; Marco Guglielmo; Andrea Baggiano; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Laura Fusini; Daniele Andreini; Saima Mushtaq; Edoardo Conte; Andrea Annoni; Alberto Formenti; Antonio Giulio Gennari; Andrea I Guaricci; Mark R Rabbat; Giulio Pompilio; Mauro Pepi; Alexia Rossi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2020-09-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.