| Literature DB >> 31131008 |
Eduardo Octaviano Primini1, José Luiz Liberato1,2, Andreia Cristina Karklin Fontana3, Wagner Ferreira Dos Santos1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: L-Glutamate (L-Glu), the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the mammalian Central Nervous System (CNS), is essential to cognitive functions. However, when L-Glu is accumulated in large concentrations at the synaptic cleft, it can induce excitotoxicity that results in secondary damage implicated in many neurological disorders. Current therapies for the treatment of neurological disorders are ineffective and have side effects associated with their use; therefore, there is a need to develop novel treatments. In this regard, previous studies have shown that neuroactive compounds obtained from the venom of the spider Parawixia bistriata have neuroprotective effects in vitro and in vivo. In this sense, this work aimed to evaluate potential neuroprotective effects of fraction RT10, obtained from this spider venom, on primary cultures of neuron and glial cells subjected to glutamate excitotoxicity insults.Entities:
Keywords: L-Glutamate; Parawixia bistriata; RT10; excitotoxicity; neuroprotection
Year: 2019 PMID: 31131008 PMCID: PMC6533932 DOI: 10.1590/1678-9199-JVATITD-1488-18
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis ISSN: 1678-9180
Figure 1.Representative chromatogram of the fractionation of P. bistriata spider venom in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), with linear gradient of solvent B (Acetonitrile) from 1 to 100%. Flow rate in 8.0 ml/min and eluents monitored and recorded at 215 nm and 245 nm. RT10= fraction studied in this work. P1=Parawixin1; P2=Parawixin2.
Figure 2.Cellular viability expressed in normalized levels of fluorescence (percent and standard deviation), after 12 hours incubation with L-Glu (5mM) to the cultures. Data is presented as mean ± S.E.M. Treatments with riluzole (100 μM) and RT10 (0.002; 0.02; 0.2 and 2 μg/μL) for 3h, before insults, produced insignificant differences. (***p< 0.001 vs. Locke’s solution group; &p<0.05 and ##p<0.01 vs. L-Glu-5 mM; +p<0.05 vs riluzole+L-Glu 5 mM). One-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test.
Figure 3.Immunofluorescence photomicrographs of primary cortical and hippocampus neuron/glia cultures in vitro (7 DIV) from Wistar rat brains. Anti-MAP2 (a) anti-NeuN (b) and anti-GFAP (c) in control conditions. 200x magnification.
Figure 4.Immunological labeling with anti-MAP2 in primary cortical neuron/glia cultures. Treatments were performed three hours prior to incubation of L-Glu, which lasted for 12 hours. A: Locke's solution; B: Riluzole (100 μM); C: RT10 (2μg / ml); D) L-Glu (5 mM); E) Riluzole (100 μM) + L-Glu (5 mM); F) RT10 (2μg / ml) + L-Glu (5mM). 200x magnification.
Figure 5.Normalized levels of FI in cells labeled with MAP2. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Cultures were treated with either riluzole (100 μM) or RT10 (2 μg/μL) for 3 hours prior to exposure to L-Glu (5mM) for 12 hours. (***p< 0.001 vs Locke’s solution group; ##p<0.01 vs. L-Glu; +++p<0.001 vs. L-Glu and **p<0.01 vs. riluzole). One-way ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls test.