| Literature DB >> 31130593 |
Shin Ohtani1, Akira Ushiyama2, Machiko Maeda3, Keiji Wada4, Yukihisa Suzuki5, Kenji Hattori6, Naoki Kunugita7, Kazuyuki Ishii8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intermediate frequency magnetic fields (IF-MFs) at around 85 kHz are a component of wireless power transfer systems used for charging electrical vehicles. However, limited data exist on the potential health effects of IF-MFs. We performed a comprehensive analysis of transcriptional expression in mice after IF-MF exposure.Entities:
Keywords: IF-MF exposure; WPT system; health effects; microarray; mouse
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31130593 PMCID: PMC6572459 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16101851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1The solenoid coil is shown in (a). The acrylic resin holder (b) were put into the center space of the coil. A mouse was freely moving in the holder as shown in (c). The fiber optic thermometer was set at the top of the acrylic holder containing the mouse. The IF-MF conditions of 70A_exposure and 90A_exposure are shown in (d).
Figure 2A substantial uniform magnetic flux density was detected in the r-axis direction at the z = 0 plane and in the space of ±20 mm in the z-axis direction from the z = 0 plane at the origin of coordinate. The magnetic flux density in each point was determined by the formula of B = (Bx2 + By2 + Bz2)1/2.
Differentially expressed transcripts in the brain and liver between IF-MF- and sham-exposed mice after FDR- and non-FDR-adjusted approaches.
| Brain | Liver | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 70A | 90A_1 | 90A_2 | 70A | 90A_1 | 90A_2 | ||
| N = 5 | N = 5 | N = 5 | N = 5 | N = 5 | N = 5 | ||
| FDR-adjusted statistical approach (Benjamini-Hochberg Procedure) | FC > 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Non-FDR-adjusted statistical approach | FC > 2.0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 29 | 2 | 0 |
| FC > 1.5 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 59 | 24 | 6 | |
Numbers in this table were the numbers extracted from the 35,240 probe sets under each condition.
Detected transcripts in the (A) brain and (B) liver with the following two limitations: the value of FC cutoff of ≥2.0 in at least two out of three experiments (70A, 90A_1, and 90A_2 exposure) or the value of FC cutoff of ≥1.5 in all three experiments after the non-FDR-adjusted approach.
| ( | ||||||
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| 17286107 |
|
| 1.09 ↑ | Prl | NM_001163530 | Prolactin |
| 17273694 |
|
| 1.10 ↓ | Pomc | NM_001278581 | Pro-opimelanocortin-alpha |
|
( | ||||||
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
| ||||
| 17351321 |
|
|
| Mir122 | NR_029600 | microRNA122 |
| 17490830 |
|
| 1.10 ↓ | Ftl1 | NM_010240 | Ferritinlightpolypeptide1 |
If the value of the fold change was >1.5 and 2.0, the notation is shown in boldface. Down or up arrows indicate “down regulation” or “up regulation,” respectively, compared with the sham-exposed group.
Relative transcript expression levels analyzed with real time RT-PCR in the (A) brain and (B) liver.
| ( | |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Sham | 0.80 | 1.56 | ±0.70 | 0.56 | 15.0 | 0.84 | ±19.87 | 0.85 |
| Expose | 1.26 | ±1.30 | 12.64 | ±12.35 | |||||
|
| Sham | 0.36 | 0.98 | ±0.34 | 0.98 | 2.10 | 0.77 | ±1.51 | 0.67 |
| Expose | 0.36 | ±0.46 | 1.62 | ±1.59 | |||||
| ( | |||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
| Sham | 0.56 | 0.61 | ±0.42 | 0.38 | 1.94 | 0.38 | ±2.08 | 0.32 |
| Expose | 0.34 | ±0.16 | 0.74 | ±0.26 | |||||
|
| Sham | 1.00 | 0.87 | ±0.39 | 0.67 | 1.05 | 1.00 | ±0.40 | 1.00 |
| Expose | 0.87 | ±0.42 | 1.05 | ±0.11 | |||||