Literature DB >> 31129474

Psychological distress in frequent users of primary health care and emergency departments: a scoping review.

E Margo-Dermer1, A Dépelteau2, A Girard3, C Hudon4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Frequent users of healthcare services are a small proportion of patients with disproportionately high healthcare usage. A wide array of factors, including psychological distress, leads to frequent use of healthcare services. There is no existing synthesis of research on frequent use and psychological distress in the general population. This scoping review aimed to compare psychological distress between frequent and non-frequent users and to examine the association between psychological distress and frequent use of healthcare services in primary care and emergency department (ED) services.
METHODS: A scoping review was performed following the five steps defined by Arksey and O'Malley. A search strategy was developed with an information specialist in five databases (Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and PubMed) for articles in English published between 1963 and October 2018. To be included, studies had to be quantitative, have taken place in a primary care or ED setting, have documented frequent use, and have measured psychological distress in patients. Two team members independently gathered the data for each of the included studies. Results were collated, summarized, and reported using narrative synthesis.
RESULTS: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. Psychological distress in primary care is generally higher in frequent users, and increased psychological distress scores are associated with frequent use. Both studies set in EDs reported noteworthy findings, stating that frequent users reported higher levels of psychological distress and that psychological distress was associated with frequent use.
CONCLUSION: Psychological distress is prevalent in frequent users and has a significant association with frequent use. As such, psychological distress should be evaluated by physicians to prevent or reduce frequent use and to identify candidates for interventions.
Copyright © 2019 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emergency department; Frequent use; Primary care; Psychological distress

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31129474     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  5 in total

1.  Psychological Nursing Effect of Patients with Gynecological Malignant Tumor.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Xitao Gao; Na Chen
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 2.  Stress Measurement in Primary Care: Conceptual Issues, Barriers, Resources, and Recommendations for Study.

Authors:  Lawson R Wulsin; Sara J Sagui-Henson; Lydia G Roos; Diana Wang; Brooke Jenkins; Beth E Cohen; Amit J Shah; George M Slavich
Journal:  Psychosom Med       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 4.312

3.  CONECT-6: a case-finding tool to identify patients with complex health needs.

Authors:  Catherine Hudon; Mathieu Bisson; Marie-France Dubois; Yohann Chiu; Maud-Christine Chouinard; Nicole Dubuc; Nicolas Elazhary; Véronique Sabourin; Alain Vanasse
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Does living close to a petrochemical complex increase the adverse psychological effects of the COVID-19 lockdown?

Authors:  Paloma Vicens; Luis Heredia; Edgar Bustamante; Yolanda Pérez; José L Domingo; Margarita Torrente
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Frequent users of emergency departments and patient flow in Alberta and Ontario, Canada: an administrative data study.

Authors:  Anqi Chen; Scott Fielding; X Joan Hu; Patrick McLane; Andrew McRae; Maria Ospina; Rhonda J Rosychuk
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.