Literature DB >> 31129310

Comparison of noise reduction methods in photoacoustic microscopy.

Gokhan Guney1, Nasire Uluc2, Aytac Demirkiran2, Esra Aytac-Kipergil2, Mehmet Burcin Unlu2, Ozlem Birgul3.   

Abstract

Photoacoustic microscopy (PAM) is classified as a hybrid imaging technique based on the photoacoustic effect and has been frequently studied in recent years. Photoacoustic (PA) signals are inherently recorded in a noisy environment and are also exposed to noise by system components. Therefore, it is essential to reduce the noise in PA signals to reconstruct images with less error. In this study, an image reconstruction algorithm for PAM system was implemented and different filtering approaches for denoising were compared. Studies were carried out in three steps: simulation, experimental phantom and blood cell studies. FIR low-pass and band-pass filters and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) based filters (mother wavelets: "bior3.5″, "bior3.7″, "sym7″) with four different thresholding techniques were examined. For the evaluation purposes, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR) and Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR) metrics were calculated. In the simulation studies, the most effective methods were obtained as: sym7/heursure/hard thresh. combination (low and medium level noise) and bior3.7/sqtwolog/soft thresh. combination (high-level noise). In experimental phantom studies, noise was classified into five levels. Different filtering approaches perform better depending on the SNR of PA images. For the blood cell study, based on the standard deviation in the background, sym7/sqtwolog/soft thresh. combination provided the best improvement and this result supported the experimental phantom results.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrete wavelet transform (DWT); Photoacoustic (PA); Photoacoustic microscopy (PAM); Signal denoising; Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31129310     DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Biol Med        ISSN: 0010-4825            Impact factor:   4.589


  3 in total

Review 1.  Recent advances toward clinical applications of photoacoustic microscopy: a review.

Authors:  Myeongsu Seong; Sung-Liang Chen
Journal:  Sci China Life Sci       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 6.038

2.  Sparse Coding-Enabled Low-Fluence Multi-Parametric Photoacoustic Microscopy.

Authors:  Zhuoying Wang; Yifeng Zhou; Song Hu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 3.  Photoacoustic imaging aided with deep learning: a review.

Authors:  Praveenbalaji Rajendran; Arunima Sharma; Manojit Pramanik
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2021-11-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.