Prasad Liyanage1, Joacim Rocklöv2, Hasitha Tissera3, Paba Palihawadana3, Annelies Wilder-Smith4, Yesim Tozan5. 1. Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka; Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden. 2. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden. 3. Ministry of Health, Colombo, Sri Lanka. 4. Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, Sweden; Department of Disease Control, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. 5. Global Health and Environmental Public Health Sciences Program, College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: tozan@nyu.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dengue has become a major public health problem in Sri Lanka with a considerable economic burden. As a response, in June, 2014, the Ministry of Health initiated a proactive vector control programme in partnership with military and police forces, known as the Civil-Military Cooperation (CIMIC) programme, that was targeted at high-risk Medical Officer of Health (MOH) divisions in the country. Evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of population-level interventions is essential to guide public health planning and resource allocation decisions, particularly in resource-limited health-care settings. METHODS: Using an interrupted time series design with a non-linear extension, we evaluated the impact of vector control interventions from June 22, 2014, to Dec 29, 2016, in Panadura, a high-risk MOH division in Western Province, Sri Lanka. We used dengue notification and larval survey data to estimate the reduction in Breteau index and dengue incidence before and after the intervention using two separate models, adjusting for time-varying confounding variables (ie, rainfall, temperature, and the Oceanic Niño Index). We also assessed the cost and cost-effectiveness of the CIMIC programme from the perspective of the National Dengue Control Unit under the scenarios of different levels of hospitalisation of dengue cases (low [25%], medium [50%], and high [75%]) in terms of cost per disability-adjusted life-year averted (DALY). FINDINGS: Vector control interventions had a significant impact on combined Breteau index (relative risk reduction 0·43, 95% CI 0·26 to 0·70) and on dengue incidence (0·43, 0·28 to 0·67), the latter becoming prominent 2 months after the intervention onset. The mean number of averted dengue cases was estimated at 2192 (95% CI 1741 to 2643), and the total cost of the CIMIC programme at 2016 US$271 615. Personnel costs accounted for about 89% of the total cost. In the base-case scenario of moderate level of hospitalisation, the CIMIC programme was cost-saving with a probability of 70% under both the lowest ($453) and highest ($1686) cost-effectiveness thresholds, resulting in a net saving of $20 247 (95% CI -57 266 to 97 790) and averting 176 DALYs (133 to 226), leading to a cost of -$98 (-497 to 395) per DALY averted. This was also the case for the scenario with high hospitalisation levels (cost per DALY averted -$512, 95% CI -872 to -115) but with a higher probability of 99%. In the scenario with low hospitalisation levels (cost per DALY averted $690, 143 to 1379), although the CIMIC programme was cost-ineffective at the lowest threshold with a probability of 77%, it was cost-effective at the highest threshold with a probability of 99%. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that communities affected by dengue can benefit from investments in vector control if interventions are implemented rigorously and coordinated well across sectors. By doing so, it is possible to reduce the disease and economic burden of dengue in endemic settings. FUNDING: None.
BACKGROUND: Dengue has become a major public health problem in Sri Lanka with a considerable economic burden. As a response, in June, 2014, the Ministry of Health initiated a proactive vector control programme in partnership with military and police forces, known as the Civil-Military Cooperation (CIMIC) programme, that was targeted at high-risk Medical Officer of Health (MOH) divisions in the country. Evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of population-level interventions is essential to guide public health planning and resource allocation decisions, particularly in resource-limited health-care settings. METHODS: Using an interrupted time series design with a non-linear extension, we evaluated the impact of vector control interventions from June 22, 2014, to Dec 29, 2016, in Panadura, a high-risk MOH division in Western Province, Sri Lanka. We used dengue notification and larval survey data to estimate the reduction in Breteau index and dengue incidence before and after the intervention using two separate models, adjusting for time-varying confounding variables (ie, rainfall, temperature, and the Oceanic Niño Index). We also assessed the cost and cost-effectiveness of the CIMIC programme from the perspective of the National Dengue Control Unit under the scenarios of different levels of hospitalisation of dengue cases (low [25%], medium [50%], and high [75%]) in terms of cost per disability-adjusted life-year averted (DALY). FINDINGS: Vector control interventions had a significant impact on combined Breteau index (relative risk reduction 0·43, 95% CI 0·26 to 0·70) and on dengue incidence (0·43, 0·28 to 0·67), the latter becoming prominent 2 months after the intervention onset. The mean number of averted dengue cases was estimated at 2192 (95% CI 1741 to 2643), and the total cost of the CIMIC programme at 2016 US$271 615. Personnel costs accounted for about 89% of the total cost. In the base-case scenario of moderate level of hospitalisation, the CIMIC programme was cost-saving with a probability of 70% under both the lowest ($453) and highest ($1686) cost-effectiveness thresholds, resulting in a net saving of $20 247 (95% CI -57 266 to 97 790) and averting 176 DALYs (133 to 226), leading to a cost of -$98 (-497 to 395) per DALY averted. This was also the case for the scenario with high hospitalisation levels (cost per DALY averted -$512, 95% CI -872 to -115) but with a higher probability of 99%. In the scenario with low hospitalisation levels (cost per DALY averted $690, 143 to 1379), although the CIMIC programme was cost-ineffective at the lowest threshold with a probability of 77%, it was cost-effective at the highest threshold with a probability of 99%. INTERPRETATION: This study suggests that communities affected by dengue can benefit from investments in vector control if interventions are implemented rigorously and coordinated well across sectors. By doing so, it is possible to reduce the disease and economic burden of dengue in endemic settings. FUNDING: None.
Authors: Keng-Yen Huang; Janet Nakigudde; Elizabeth Nsamba Kisakye; Hafsa Sentongo; Tracy A Dennis-Tiwary; Yesim Tozan; Hyung Park; Laurie Miller Brotman Journal: Int J Ment Health Syst Date: 2022-06-20
Authors: Christina S Xiao; Stephen J Sharp; Esther M F van Sluijs; David Ogilvie; Jenna Panter Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2022-07-07 Impact factor: 8.915
Authors: Rebecca C Christofferson; Daniel M Parker; Hans J Overgaard; Jeffrey Hii; Gregor Devine; Bruce A Wilcox; Vu Sinh Nam; Sazaly Abubakar; Sebastien Boyer; Kobporn Boonnak; Stephen S Whitehead; Rekol Huy; Leang Rithea; Tho Sochantha; Thomas E Wellems; Jesus G Valenzuela; Jessica E Manning Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis Date: 2020-07-30
Authors: Oliver J Brady; Dinar D Kharisma; Nandyan N Wilastonegoro; Kathleen M O'Reilly; Emilie Hendrickx; Leonardo S Bastos; Laith Yakob; Donald S Shepard Journal: BMC Med Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 8.775
Authors: Juliana Quintero; Nicolás Ronderos Pulido; James Logan; Thomas Ant; Jane Bruce; Gabriel Carrasquilla Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-01 Impact factor: 3.240