Literature DB >> 31128617

A review of the burden and management of mild asthma in adults - Implications for clinical practice.

Aruni Mulgirigama1, Neil Barnes2, Monica Fletcher3, Søren Pedersen4, Emilio Pizzichini5, Ioanna Tsiligianni6.   

Abstract

Mild asthma is present in 50-75% of patients with asthma and is defined by the Global Initiative for Asthma as asthma that can be well controlled with low-intensity treatments (Steps 1 and 2). Despite this definition, 'mild' asthma is often not well controlled in reality, and can have a significant impact on an individual's symptom burden and quality of life. We performed a PubMed literature search to investigate the burden of 'mild' asthma in the lives of patients, including future risk and asthma control, and the current management strategies. While clinical guidelines recommend long-term, daily, low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for 'mild' asthma, published data suggest that ICS are often under-prescribed or used intermittently as symptoms arise. Furthermore, patients and physicians tend to overestimate disease control, impacting the accuracy of diagnosing 'mild asthma' and subsequent management. This disconnect may be amplified by miscommunication between patients and physicians, limited objective assessment of control, and differences in guidelines. As with moderate and severe asthma, current evidence supports early initiation of regular ICS in 'mild' asthma to address the underlying inflammation, achieve symptom control and reduce risk of exacerbations. Adherence to ICS treatment is key and can be improved by educating both patients and healthcare professionals. The results of this literature search challenge the term 'mild' asthma and suggest strategies to improve the proactive management of the disease to enable patients to live symptom-free.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anti-asthmatic agents; Corticosteroids; Intermittent corticosteroids; Medication adherence; Mild asthma; Primary healthcare

Year:  2019        PMID: 31128617     DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.04.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respir Med        ISSN: 0954-6111            Impact factor:   3.415


  4 in total

Review 1.  Expert Opinion on Practice Patterns in Mild Asthma After the GINA 2019 Updates: A Major Shift in Treatment Paradigms from a Long-Standing SABA-Only Approach to a Risk Reduction-Based Strategy with the Use of Symptom-Driven (As-Needed) Low-Dose ICS/LABA.

Authors:  Zeynep Ferhan Ozseker; Kurtulus Aksu; Levent Cem Mutlu; Pinar Mutlu; Can Ozturk
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2022-06-11       Impact factor: 4.919

2.  Pharmacology Versus Convenience: A Benefit/Risk Analysis of Regular Maintenance Versus Infrequent or As-Needed Inhaled Corticosteroid Use in Mild Asthma.

Authors:  Peter Daley-Yates; Bhumika Aggarwal; Zrinka Lulic; Sourabh Fulmali; Alvaro A Cruz; Dave Singh
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Association between Interleukin-4-590C>T Polymorphism and the Susceptibility to Asthma: A Meta-Analysis of Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Weimou Yin; Ling Luo; Yankui Wu; Songmei Qin; Xuejun Qin
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  Genetic variants in miR-145 gene are associated with the risk of asthma in Taiwan.

Authors:  Shou-Cheng Wang; Chia-Wen Tsai; Wen-Shin Chang; Ning-Yi Hsia; Mei-Chin Mong; Yun-Chi Wang; Te-Chun Hsia; Jian Gu; Da-Tian Bau
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.