Literature DB >> 3112858

Terminal care preferences: hospice placement and severity of disease.

J S Powers, M C Burger.   

Abstract

National Hospice Study data for 1981-82 were used to predict the location of care for terminal cancer patients. Sites of care were conventional care in hospitals, hospital-based hospice care, and hospice care in the home. Subjects were terminal cancer patients with a prognosis of less than 6 months of life who were attended by a primary concerned person. There were 1,732 patients 18-99 years old-293 conventional care, 612 hospital-based hospice care, and 827 hospice home care patients. Data sources were the patient, the primary concerned person, the family, and the medical record. Data were obtained at initial interview for the study, 1-week followup, reassessment every 2 weeks, and bereavement interviews. Information was grouped in the following categories: patient functional status, patient psychological outlook, symptomatology, medical condition, and characteristics of the primary concerned person and family. Conclusions were reached by univariate and multivariate analysis. First, a progression of functional disability was found to exist among care sites, from hospice home care for the least disabled to hospital-based hospice care to conventional care for patients with the greatest disabilities. The location of care was best explained by the patient's functional capacity. Second, the location of care was found to be poorly explained by extent of organ involvement or specific symptoms. Third, the primary concerned persons of patients under hospice home care experienced more stress but reacted no differently when compared with primary concerned persons at other care sites. Fourth, patients under hospice home care survived the longest and reported greater family closeness than other care groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3112858      PMCID: PMC1477872     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  26 in total

1.  STUDIES OF ILLNESS IN THE AGED. THE INDEX OF ADL: A STANDARDIZED MEASURE OF BIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOSOCIAL FUNCTION.

Authors:  S KATZ; A B FORD; R W MOSKOWITZ; B A JACKSON; M W JAFFE
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1963-09-21       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Health status index: category rating versus magnitude estimation for measuring levels of well-being.

Authors:  R M Kaplan; J W Bush; C C Berry
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Predicting mortality in the institutionalized aged. A seven-year follow-up.

Authors:  A I Goldfarb
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1969-08

4.  Impending death and the use of hospitals by the elderly.

Authors:  E Shapiro
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 5.562

5.  Predicting the outcomes of nursing home patients.

Authors:  R L Kane; R Bell; S Riegler; A Wilson; E Keeler
Journal:  Gerontologist       Date:  1983-04

6.  The rapid disability rating scale-2.

Authors:  M W Linn; B S Linn
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1982-06       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Chronic disease, function and the quality of care.

Authors:  L E Cluff
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1981

8.  The elderly in residential care: mortality in relation to functional capacity.

Authors:  L J Donaldson; D G Clayton; M Clarke
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Predictors of mortality in the institutionalized age.

Authors:  A I Goldfarb; M Fisch; I E Gerber
Journal:  Dis Nerv Syst       Date:  1966-01

10.  Where do elderly patients prefer to die? Place of death and patient characteristics of 100 elderly patients under the care of a home health care team.

Authors:  A Groth-Juncker; J McCusker
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 5.562

View more
  2 in total

1.  Factors affecting place of death of hospice and non-hospice cancer patients.

Authors:  C M Moinpour; L Polissar
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers.

Authors:  Barbara Gomes; Natalia Calanzani; Vito Curiale; Paul McCrone; Irene J Higginson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-06-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.