Literature DB >> 31128428

Development of predictive models to identify advanced-stage cancer patients in a US healthcare claims database.

Daina B Esposito1, Leo Russo2, Dina Oksen3, Ruihua Yin4, Vibha C A Desai4, Jennifer G Lyons4, Patrice Verpillat3, Jose L Peñalvo3, Francois-Xavier Lamy3, Stephan Lanes5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although healthcare databases are a valuable source for real-world oncology data, cancer stage is often lacking. We developed predictive models using claims data to identify metastatic/advanced-stage patients with ovarian cancer, urothelial carcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: Patients with ≥1 diagnosis of a cancer of interest were identified in the HealthCore Integrated Research Database (HIRD), a United States (US) healthcare database (2010-2016). Data were linked to three US state cancer registries and the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment Oncology database to identify cancer stage. Predictive models were constructed to estimate the probability of metastatic/advanced stage. Predictors available in the HIRD were identified and coefficients estimated by Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression with cross-validation to control overfitting. Classification error rates and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to select probability thresholds for classifying patients as cases of metastatic/advanced cancer.
RESULTS: We used 2723 ovarian cancer, 6522 urothelial carcinoma, 1441 gastric adenocarcinoma, 109 MCC, and 12,373 NSCLC cases of early and metastatic/advanced cancer to develop predictive models. All models had high discrimination (C > 0.85). At thresholds selected for each model, PPVs were all >0.75: ovarian cancer = 0.95 (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.94-0.96), urothelial carcinoma = 0.78 (95% CI: 0.70-0.86), gastric adenocarcinoma = 0.86 (95% CI: 0.83-0.88), MCC = 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.89), and NSCLC = 0.91 (95% CI 0.90 - 0.92).
CONCLUSION: Predictive modeling was used to identify five types of metastatic/advanced cancer in a healthcare claims database with greater accuracy than previous methods.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gastric adenocarcinoma; LASSO regression; Machine learning; Merkel cell carcinoma; Non-small cell lung cancer; Ovarian cancer; Predictive modeling; Urothelial carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31128428     DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2019.05.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  6 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Estimating Breast Cancer Recurrence at the Population Level With Administrative Data.

Authors:  Hava Izci; Tim Tambuyzer; Krizia Tuand; Victoria Depoorter; Annouschka Laenen; Hans Wildiers; Ignace Vergote; Liesbet Van Eycken; Harlinde De Schutter; Freija Verdoodt; Patrick Neven
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Problem-solving skills training in adult cancer survivors: Bright IDEAS-AC pilot study.

Authors:  Katia Noyes; Alaina L Zapf; Rachel M Depner; Tessa Flores; Alissa Huston; Hani H Rashid; Demetria McNeal; Louis S Constine; Fergal J Fleming; Gregory E Wilding; Olle Jane Z Sahler
Journal:  Cancer Treat Res Commun       Date:  2022-03-25

3.  Machine learning models for identifying predictors of clinical outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ying Li; Matthew Brendel; Ning Wu; Wenzhen Ge; Hao Zhang; Petra Rietschel; Ruben G W Quek; Jean-Francois Pouliot; Fei Wang; James Harnett
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Novel prospective umbrella-type lung cancer registry study for clarifying clinical practice patterns: CS-Lung-003 study protocol.

Authors:  Kazuya Nishii; Masaaki Inoue; Hideto Obata; Yutaka Ueda; Toshiyuki Kozuki; Masahiro Yamasaki; Tomonori Moritaka; Yoshikazu Awaya; Keisuke Sugimoto; Kenichi Gemba; Shoichi Kuyama; Hirohisa Ichikawa; Takuo Shibayama; Tetsuya Kubota; Masahiro Kodani; Daizo Kishino; Nobukazu Fujimoto; Nobuhisa Ishikawa; Yukari Tsubata; Tomoya Ishii; Kazunori Fujitaka; Katsuyuki Hotta; Katsuyuki Kiura
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.500

5.  Uncertainty in lung cancer stage for survival estimation via set-valued classification.

Authors:  Savannah Bergquist; Gabriel A Brooks; Mary Beth Landrum; Nancy L Keating; Sherri Rose
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  A real-world study on characteristics, treatments and outcomes in US patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Daniel C Beachler; Francois-Xavier Lamy; Leo Russo; Devon H Taylor; Jade Dinh; Ruihua Yin; Aziza Jamal-Allial; Samuel Dychter; Stephan Lanes; Patrice Verpillat
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 4.234

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.