Literature DB >> 31128331

Globalization, energy use, and environmental degradation in South Africa: Startling empirical evidence from the Maki-cointegration test.

Abdulkadir Abdulrashid Rafindadi1, Ojonugwa Usman2.   

Abstract

This study investigates whether the dynamic effects of globalization and energy consumption can lead to a significant rise in South Africa's environmental degradation. Specifically, the study investigates which among the combinations of the variable of globalization, energy use, and economic growth is possessive with the dynamics of influencing upward or downward movement of South Africa's environmental degradation and hence Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC). To ensure robust and parsimonious result, time series data from 1971 to 2014 was used. The structural breaks from the Maki cointegration tests were incorporated in the FMOLS and CRR models for the dynamic long-run estimates while the short-run estimates were obtained from the conditional Error Correction Model (ECM) regression. The direction of causality was investigated using the Toda-Yamamoto causality test. The finding from this test was validated using the innovation accounting analysis and the impulse response function. The results established the existence of an upward EKC dynamics, which bear a major linkage from the excessive fossil fuel energy use in South Africa. While globalization, was detected to condense environmental degradation in the short-run irrespective of the degree of economic growth attained by the country. Complementing this finding was the Toda-Yamamoto test, which established the existence of a one-way causality running from energy use to environmental degradation and again, a two-way causality between economic growth and globalization. The innovation accounting test revealed that 7.96% and 0.80% of energy use and globalization could lead to corresponding environmental degradation of 72.52% and 1.39% respectively. The study, therefore, advocates the need for conservative energy policies and pollution-free energy mix. How to achieve these are carefully outlined by the present study.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  EKC hypothesis; Energy use; Environmental degradation; Maki cointegration; Toda-yamamoto causality

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31128331     DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.05.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Manage        ISSN: 0301-4797            Impact factor:   6.789


  9 in total

1.  Achieving Environmental Sustainability in Africa: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption, Natural Resources, and Government Effectiveness-Evidence from Symmetric and Asymmetric ARDL Models.

Authors:  Li Yang; Sumaiya Bashiru Danwana; Fadilul-Lah Yassaanah Issahaku
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Simulation of Land-Use Spatiotemporal Changes under Ecological Quality Constraints: The Case of the Wuhan Urban Agglomeration Area, China, over 2020-2030.

Authors:  Jingye Li; Jian Gong; Jean-Michel Guldmann; Jianxin Yang; Zhong Zhang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Is the Relocation of Polluting Industries Prompted by FDI Flow and Stock, Globalisation, Corruption and Regulation?

Authors:  Patrícia Hipólito Leal; Rafaela Vital Caetano; António Cardoso Marques
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Towards mitigating ecological degradation in G-7 countries: accounting for economic effect dynamics, renewable energy consumption, and innovation.

Authors:  Ojonugwa Usman; Paul Terhemba Iorember; Gylych Jelilov; Abdurrahman Isik; George N Ike; Samuel Asumadu Sarkodie
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-12-13

5.  Impacts of digitalization on energy security: evidence from European countries.

Authors:  To Trung Thanh; Le Thanh Ha; Hoang Phuong Dung; Tran Thi Lan Huong
Journal:  Environ Dev Sustain       Date:  2022-07-30       Impact factor: 4.080

6.  Modeling for Insights: Does Fiscal Decentralization Impede Ecological Footprint?

Authors:  Guitao Qiao; Dan Yang; Mahmood Ahmad; Zahoor Ahmed
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.614

7.  Inequalities by energy sources: An assessment of environmental quality.

Authors:  Xing Yao; Rizwana Yasmeen; Ihtsham Ul Haq Padda; Wasi Ul Hassan Shah; Muhammad Abdul Kamal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Testing the moderating role of trade openness on the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a novel approach.

Authors:  Taimur Sharif; Mirza Md Moyen Uddin; Constantinos Alexiou
Journal:  Ann Oper Res       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.854

9.  A Roadmap toward Achieving Sustainable Environment: Evaluating the Impact of Technological Innovation and Globalization on Load Capacity Factor.

Authors:  Abraham Ayobamiji Awosusi; Kaan Kutlay; Mehmet Altuntaş; Bakhtiyor Khodjiev; Ephraim Bonah Agyekum; Mokhtar Shouran; Mohamed Elgbaily; Salah Kamel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.