Ashley R Smith1, Lauren K White2, Ellen Leibenluft3, Anastasia L McGlade4, Adina C Heckelman5, Simone P Haller3, George A Buzzell6, Nathan A Fox6, Daniel S Pine3. 1. National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: ashley.smith2@nih.gov. 2. Lifespan Brain Institute, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland. 4. University of California, Los Angeles, CA. 5. Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY. 6. University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Although behaviorally inhibited (BI) temperament predicts risk for anxiety, anxiety in BI may involve distinct neural responses to errors. The current study examines the relations between anxiety and neural correlates of error processing both in youths identified as BI in early childhood and in youths seeking treatment for an anxiety disorder. METHOD: All participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging using a flanker task to assess responses to errors. A study in healthy subjects assessed test-retest reliability to inform analyses in two other samples. For one sample, a cohort of BI youths (Low BI, n = 28; High BI, n = 27) was followed into adolescence. For the other, participants were recruited based on the presence or absence of an anxiety disorder. Using identical methods in medication-free subjects, analyses compared relations between anxiety and error processing across the two samples. RESULTS: Error-processing exhibited acceptable reliability. Within a ventromedial-prefrontal-cortex (vmPFC) cluster, anxiety related to error processing only in youths whose early-life BI status was known. In the high BI group, anxiety related to reduced neural response to errors. No such associations manifested in treatment-seeking youths. Other analyses mapped relations between error-processing and anxiety in each sample on its own. However, only the vmPFC cluster statistically differentiated the neural correlates of anxiety in BI. CONCLUSION: BI temperament may define a unique pathway into anxiety involving perturbed neural responding to errors. Although BI is a risk factor for later anxiety, the neural and associated features of anxiety in BI youths may differ from those in treatment-seeking youths.
OBJECTIVE: Although behaviorally inhibited (BI) temperament predicts risk for anxiety, anxiety in BI may involve distinct neural responses to errors. The current study examines the relations between anxiety and neural correlates of error processing both in youths identified as BI in early childhood and in youths seeking treatment for an anxiety disorder. METHOD: All participants underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging using a flanker task to assess responses to errors. A study in healthy subjects assessed test-retest reliability to inform analyses in two other samples. For one sample, a cohort of BI youths (Low BI, n = 28; High BI, n = 27) was followed into adolescence. For the other, participants were recruited based on the presence or absence of an anxiety disorder. Using identical methods in medication-free subjects, analyses compared relations between anxiety and error processing across the two samples. RESULTS: Error-processing exhibited acceptable reliability. Within a ventromedial-prefrontal-cortex (vmPFC) cluster, anxiety related to error processing only in youths whose early-life BI status was known. In the high BI group, anxiety related to reduced neural response to errors. No such associations manifested in treatment-seeking youths. Other analyses mapped relations between error-processing and anxiety in each sample on its own. However, only the vmPFC cluster statistically differentiated the neural correlates of anxiety in BI. CONCLUSION:BI temperament may define a unique pathway into anxiety involving perturbed neural responding to errors. Although BI is a risk factor for later anxiety, the neural and associated features of anxiety in BI youths may differ from those in treatment-seeking youths.
Authors: Connie Lamm; Olga L Walker; Kathryn A Degnan; Heather A Henderson; Daniel S Pine; Jennifer Martin McDermott; Nathan A Fox Journal: Dev Sci Date: 2014-04-22
Authors: George A Buzzell; Sonya V Troller-Renfree; Tyson V Barker; Lindsay C Bowman; Andrea Chronis-Tuscano; Heather A Henderson; Jerome Kagan; Daniel S Pine; Nathan A Fox Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Jillian E Hardee; Brenda E Benson; Yair Bar-Haim; Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley; Gang Chen; Jennifer C Britton; Monique Ernst; Nathan A Fox; Daniel S Pine; Koraly Pérez-Edgar Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Lauren K White; Jennifer C Britton; Stefanie Sequeira; Emily G Ronkin; Gang Chen; Yair Bar-Haim; Tomer Shechner; Monique Ernst; Nathan A Fox; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-04-27 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Alexandria Meyer; Greg Hajcak; Dana Torpey-Newman; Autumn Kujawa; Thomas M Olino; Margaret Dyson; Daniel N Klein Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 3.038
Authors: Ashley R Smith; Simone P Haller; Sara A Haas; David Pagliaccio; Brigid Behrens; Caroline Swetlitz; Jessica L Bezek; Melissa A Brotman; Ellen Leibenluft; Nathan A Fox; Daniel S Pine Journal: Cogn Emot Date: 2020-09-21
Authors: Courtney A Filippi; Sanjana Ravi; Maya Bracy; Anderson Winkler; Chad M Sylvester; Daniel S Pine; Nathan A Fox Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 13.113
Authors: Emilio A Valadez; Sonya V Troller-Renfree; George A Buzzell; Heather A Henderson; Andrea Chronis-Tuscano; Daniel S Pine; Nathan A Fox Journal: JCPP Adv Date: 2021-07-02
Authors: Courtney A Filippi; Anni Subar; Sanjana Ravi; Sara Haas; Sonya V Troller-Renfree; Nathan A Fox; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel S Pine Journal: Child Psychiatry Hum Dev Date: 2021-03-18