Literature DB >> 31128097

Genetic reduction of MMP-9 in the Fmr1 KO mouse partially rescues prepulse inhibition of acoustic startle response.

Jamiela Kokash1, Erin M Alderson2, Sarah M Reinhard2, Cynthia A Crawford3, Devin K Binder4, Iryna M Ethell4, Khaleel A Razak5.   

Abstract

Sensory processing abnormalities are consistently associated with autism, but the underlying mechanisms and treatment options are unclear. Fragile X Syndrome (FXS) is the leading known genetic cause of intellectual disabilities and autism. One debilitating symptom of FXS is hypersensitivity to sensory stimuli. Sensory hypersensitivity is seen in both humans with FXS and FXS mouse model, the Fmr1 knock out (Fmr1 KO) mouse. Abnormal sensorimotor gating may play a role in the hypersensitivity to sensory stimuli. Humans with FXS and Fmr1 KO mice show abnormalities in acoustic startle response (ASR) and prepulse inhibition (PPI) of startle, responses commonly used to quantify sensorimotor gating. Recent studies have suggested high levels of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as a potential mechanism of sensory abnormalities in FXS. Here we tested the hypothesis that genetic reduction of MMP-9 in Fmr1 KO mice rescues ASR and PPI phenotypes in adult Fmr1 KO mice. We measured MMP-9 levels in the inferior colliculus (IC), an integral region of the PPI circuit, of WT and Fmr1 KO mice at P7, P12, P18, and P40. MMP-9 levels were higher in the IC of Fmr1 KO mice during early development (P7, P12), but not in adults. We compared ASR and PPI responses in young (P23-25) and adult (P50-80) Fmr1 KO mice to their age-matched wildtype (WT) controls. We found that both ASR and PPI were reduced in the young Fmr1 KO mice compared to age-matched WT mice. There was no genotype difference for ASR in the adult mice, but PPI was significantly reduced in the adult Fmr1 KO mice. The adult mouse data are similar to those observed in humans with FXS. Genetic reduction of MMP-9 in the Fmr1 KO mice resulted in a rescue of adult PPI responses to WT levels. Taken together, these results show sensorimotor gating abnormalities in Fmr1 KO mice, and suggest the potential for MMP-9 regulation as a therapeutic target to reduce sensory hypersensitivity.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic startle response; Autism; Fragile X syndrome; Matrix metalloproteinase-9; Prepulse inhibition; Sensorimotor gating

Year:  2019        PMID: 31128097      PMCID: PMC6640842          DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  41 in total

1.  Gene expression profiles of the rat cochlea, cochlear nucleus, and inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Younsook Cho; Tzy-Wen L Gong; Timo Stöver; Margaret I Lomax; Richard A Altschuler
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2002-03

2.  Alterations in the auditory startle response in Fmr1 targeted mutant mouse models of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Darci M Nielsen; William J Derber; Danielle A McClellan; Linda S Crnic
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2002-02-08       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Fragile X mice develop sensory hyperreactivity to auditory stimuli.

Authors:  L Chen; M Toth
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Altered synaptic plasticity in a mouse model of fragile X mental retardation.

Authors:  Kimberly M Huber; Sean M Gallagher; Stephen T Warren; Mark F Bear
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Fmrp is required for the establishment of the startle response during the critical period of auditory development.

Authors:  Seong-Wook Yun; Jimcy Platholi; Maria Sol Flaherty; Weimin Fu; Andreas H Kottmann; Miklos Toth
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-02       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Brain stem circuits mediating prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex.

Authors:  M Fendt; L Li; J S Yeomans
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Autistic behavior in children with fragile X syndrome: prevalence, stability, and the impact of FMRP.

Authors:  Deborah D Hatton; John Sideris; Martie Skinner; Jean Mankowski; Donald B Bailey; Jane Roberts; Penny Mirrett
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.802

Review 8.  Neuropsychiatric symptoms of fragile X syndrome: pathophysiology and pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  John A Tsiouris; W Ted Brown
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

9.  Rescue of behavioral phenotype and neuronal protrusion morphology in Fmr1 KO mice.

Authors:  Femke M S de Vrij; Josien Levenga; Herma C van der Linde; Sebastiaan K Koekkoek; Chris I De Zeeuw; David L Nelson; Ben A Oostra; Rob Willemsen
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 5.996

10.  Sensorimotor gating abnormalities in young males with fragile X syndrome and Fmr1-knockout mice.

Authors:  P W Frankland; Y Wang; B Rosner; T Shimizu; B W Balleine; E M Dykens; E M Ornitz; A J Silva
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 15.992

View more
  10 in total

1.  Abnormal development of auditory responses in the inferior colliculus of a mouse model of Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Anna O Nguyen; Devin K Binder; Iryna M Ethell; Khaleel A Razak
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Influence of Gestational Chlorpyrifos Exposure on ASD-like Behaviors in an fmr1-KO Rat Model.

Authors:  Cristian Perez-Fernandez; María Matamala Montoya; Miguel Morales-Navas; Laia Guardia-Escote; María Cabré; María Teresa Colomina; Estela Giménez; Fernando Sánchez-Santed
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 5.682

3.  A sound-driven cortical phase-locking change in the Fmr1 KO mouse requires Fmr1 deletion in a subpopulation of brainstem neurons.

Authors:  Andrew J Holley; Aleya Shedd; Anna Boggs; Jonathan Lovelace; Craig Erickson; Christina Gross; Miranda Jankovic; Khaleel Razak; Kimberly Huber; Jay R Gibson
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 7.046

Review 4.  Mechanisms underlying auditory processing deficits in Fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McCullagh; Sarah E Rotschafer; Benjamin D Auerbach; Achim Klug; Leonard K Kaczmarek; Karina S Cramer; Randy J Kulesza; Khaleel A Razak; Jonathan W Lovelace; Yong Lu; Ursula Koch; Yuan Wang
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Targeted therapy of cognitive deficits in fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  A Puścian; M Winiarski; J Borowska; S Łęski; T Górkiewicz; M Chaturvedi; K Nowicka; M Wołyniak; J J Chmielewska; T Nikolaev; K Meyza; M Dziembowska; L Kaczmarek; E Knapska
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 13.437

Review 6.  Interneuron Dysfunction and Inhibitory Deficits in Autism and Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Toshihiro Nomura
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Pten haploinsufficiency causes desynchronized growth of brain areas involved in sensory processing.

Authors:  Amy E Clipperton-Allen; Hannah Swick; Valentina Botero; Massimiliano Aceti; Jacob Ellegood; Jason P Lerch; Damon T Page
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-01-19

Review 8.  Auditory Dysfunction in Animal Models of Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Castro; Patricia Monteiro
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.639

Review 9.  The Inferior Colliculus in Alcoholism and Beyond.

Authors:  Tanuja Bordia; Natalie M Zahr
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-11

10.  Hyperexcitability and Homeostasis in Fragile X Syndrome.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Liu; Vipendra Kumar; Nien-Pei Tsai; Benjamin D Auerbach
Journal:  Front Mol Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.639

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.