Literature DB >> 31127006

Within-individual behavioural variability and division of labour in social insects.

Raphaël Jeanson1.   

Abstract

Division of labour, whereby individuals divide the workload in a group, is a recurrent property of social living. The current conceptual framework for division of labour in social insects is provided by the response-threshold model. This model posits that the differences between individuals (i.e. between-individual variability) in responsiveness to task-associated stimuli is a key feature for task specialisation. The consistency of individual behaviours (i.e. within-individual variability) in task performance represents an additional but little-considered component driving robust patterns of division of labour. On the one hand, the presence of workers with a high level of within-individual variability presumably allows colonies to rapidly adapt to external fluctuations. On the other hand, a reduced degree of within-individual variability promotes a stricter specialisation in task performance, thereby limiting the costs of task switching. The ideal balance between flexibility and canalisation probably varies depending on the developmental stage of the colony to satisfy its changing needs. Here, I introduce the main sources of within-individual variability in behaviours in social insects and I review neural correlates accompanying the changes in behavioural flexibility. I propose the hypothesis that the positive scaling between group size and the intensity of task specialisation, a relationship consistently reported both within and between taxa, may rely on reduced within-individual variability via self-organised processes linked to the quality of brood care. Overall, I emphasise the need for a more comprehensive characterisation of the response dynamics of individuals to better understand the mechanisms shaping division of labour in social insects.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Keywords:  Ant; Group size; Ontogeny; Plasticity; Task specialisation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31127006     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.190868

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Early social context does not influence behavioral variation at adulthood in ants.

Authors:  Iago Sanmartín-Villar; Raphaël Jeanson
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 2.734

2.  The relationship between individual phenotype and the division of labour in naked mole-rats: it's complicated.

Authors:  James D Gilbert; Stephen J Rossiter; Chris G Faulkes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 3.  Five decades of misunderstanding in the social Hymenoptera: a review and meta-analysis of Michener's paradox.

Authors:  Robert L Jeanne; Kevin J Loope; Andrew M Bouwma; Erik V Nordheim; Michael L Smith
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-03-25

4.  A small number of workers with specific personality traits perform tool use in ants.

Authors:  István Maák; Garyk Roelandt; Patrizia d'Ettorre
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Behavior Individuality: A Focus on Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Rubén Mollá-Albaladejo; Juan A Sánchez-Alcañiz
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Response thresholds alone cannot explain empirical patterns of division of labor in social insects.

Authors:  Yuko Ulrich; Mari Kawakatsu; Christopher K Tokita; Jonathan Saragosti; Vikram Chandra; Corina E Tarnita; Daniel J C Kronauer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 8.029

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.