Literature DB >> 31126825

One-year follow-up of a remotely delivered epilepsy self-management program in high-risk people with epilepsy.

Martha Sajatovic1, Kari Colon-Zimmermann2, Mustafa Kahriman3, Edna Fuentes-Casiano4, Christopher Burant5, Michelle E Aebi4, Kristin A Cassidy2, Samden Lhatoo6, Douglas Einstadter7, Peijun Chen8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: "Self-management for people with epilepsy and a history of negative health events" (SMART) is a novel group-format epilepsy self-management intervention demonstrated to reduce negative health events (NHEs) such as accidents, emergency department visits, and seizures in adults with epilepsy in a 6-month prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT); SMART also reduced depressive symptoms and improved health functioning and quality of life. This report describes the longer-term (12-month) post-efficacy RCT outcomes in adults with epilepsy who received SMART.
METHODS: After completing a 6-month, prospective RCT that demonstrated efficacy of SMART vs 6-month waitlist control (WL), adults ≥18 years of age with epilepsy were followed for an additional 12 months. Individuals originally randomized to WL received the 8-week SMART intervention immediately following the conclusion of the RCT. For this long-term extension analysis, assessments were conducted at 24 weeks (the 6-month primary outcome time-point of the efficacy RCT), at 32 weeks for individuals originally randomized to WL, and at 48 weeks and 72 weeks for all individuals. Outcomes assessed included past 6-month NHE counts, depressive symptoms assessed with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and quality of life assessed with the 10-item Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-10).
RESULTS: At the beginning of this long-term observational period (24-week follow-up time point for the original RCT), there were 50 individuals in the group originally randomized to SMART and 52 originally randomized to WL. Mean age was 41.4 years, 70% women (N = 71), 64% (N = 65) African-American, and 8% Hispanic (N = 8). Study attrition from week 24 to week 72 was 8% in the arm originally randomized to SMART and 17% in the arm originally randomized to WL. During the 12-month observation period (24 weeks to 72 weeks), there were a total of 44 serious adverse events and 4 deaths, none related to study participation. There was no significant change in total past 6-month NHE counts in the group originally randomized to SMART, although the group had significantly reduced 6-month seizure counts. The group originally randomized to WL, who received SMART during this observational period, had a reduction in total NHE counts. The group originally randomized to SMART had relatively stable levels on other outcome variables except for a trend for improved MADRS (p = 0.08). In the group originally randomized to WL, there were significant improvements in PHQ-9 (p = 0.01), MADRS (p ≤ 0.01), and QOLIE-10 (p = 0.004).
CONCLUSIONS: This post-RCT extension study suggests that adults with epilepsy who participate in the SMART intervention sustain clinical effects at 1-year follow-up and may have incremental improvements in seizure frequency and mood. Future research needs to identify opportunities for scale-up and outreach to other high-risk groups with epilepsy.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression; Epilepsy; Quality of life; Seizures; Self-management

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31126825      PMCID: PMC7370541          DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2019.04.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsy Behav        ISSN: 1525-5050            Impact factor:   2.937


  24 in total

1.  Depression and quality of life in Spanish-speaking immigrant persons with epilepsy compared with those in English-speaking US-born persons with epilepsy.

Authors:  Lorna Myers; Marcelo Lancman; Gonzalo Vazquez-Casals; Marcela Bonafina; Kenneth Perrine; Jomard Sabri
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.937

2.  Behavioral risk factors among Arizonans with epilepsy: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2005/2006.

Authors:  Jenny Chong; Hemant S Kudrimoti; Darlene C W Lopez; David M Labiner
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 2.937

3.  The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure.

Authors:  K Kroenke; R L Spitzer; J B Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  The SF 36 health survey questionnaire. A valid measure of health status...

Authors:  D Ruta; A Garratt; M Abdalla; K Buckingham; I Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-08-14

5.  Comparison between the QOLIE-31 and derived QOLIE-10 in a clinical trial of levetiracetam.

Authors:  J A Cramer; C Arrigo; G Van Hammée; E B Bromfield
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.045

6.  The association of stigma with self-management and perceptions of health care among adults with epilepsy.

Authors:  Colleen DiIorio; Patricia Osborne Shafer; Richard Letz; Thomas Henry; Donald L Schomer; Katherine Yeager
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.937

7.  Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale revisited.

Authors:  G A Baker; D F Smith; A Jacoby; J A Hayes; D W Chadwick
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.184

8.  A brief questionnaire to screen for quality of life in epilepsy: the QOLIE-10.

Authors:  J A Cramer; K Perrine; O Devinsky; K Meador
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 9.  Surveillance of epilepsy and prevention of epilepsy and its sequelae: lessons from the Institute of Medicine report.

Authors:  Dale C Hesdorffer; Charles E Begley
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 5.710

10.  Racial disparities in neurologic health care access and utilization in the United States.

Authors:  Altaf Saadi; David U Himmelstein; Steffie Woolhandler; Nicte I Mejia
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Psychological treatments for people with epilepsy.

Authors:  Rosa Michaelis; Venus Tang; Sarah J Nevitt; Janelle L Wagner; Avani C Modi; William Curt LaFrance; Laura H Goldstein; Milena Gandy; Rebecca Bresnahan; Kette Valente; Kirsten A Donald; Markus Reuber
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-09-07

2.  Decreasing Emergency Department Visits for Children With Epilepsy.

Authors:  Anup D Patel; Andrea Debs; Debbie Terry; William Parker; Mary Burch; Debra Luciano; Lauren Patton; Jena Brubaker; Julie Chrisman; Kathy Moellman; James Herbst; Daniel M Cohen
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2021-10

3.  Engaging stakeholders in the refinement of an evidence-based remotely delivered epilepsy self-management program for rural populations.

Authors:  Carol Blixen; Gena Ghearing; Owen Wade; Kari Colon-Zimmerman; Maegan Tyrrell; Martha Sajatovic
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.937

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.