Literature DB >> 31126737

Prognostic value and diagnostic properties of the diastolic pulmonary pressure gradient in patients with pulmonary hypertension and left heart disease.

Robert Dragu1, Emilia Hardak2, Astghik Ohanyan2, Yochai Adir3, Doron Aronson4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of the diastolic pressure gradient (DPG) for the diagnosis of combined post- and pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (Cpc-PH) versus isolated post-capillary pulmonary hypertension (Ipc-PH) in patients with PH due to left heart disease (PH-LHD) remains controversial. We studied the incremental prognostic information provided by DPG and potential sources of disagreements between different hemodynamic criteria for Cpc-PH.
METHODS: We studied 393 patients with PH-LHD who underwent right heart catheterization and were followed for hospitalizations and all-cause mortality for a median of 53 months. Patients were classified into Ipc-PH or Cpc-PH using DPG, pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) or transpulmonary gradient (TPG)-based criteria.
RESULTS: Classifying PH categories according to DPG alone was not associated with a significant difference in clinical outcomes between patients with Ipc-PH and Cpc-PH (P = 0.17). By contrast, PVR criteria alone were associated with a strong prognostic separation between Ipc-PH and Cpc-PH (P = 0.005). Adding DPG to the PVR-based classification contributed no additional prognostic information. Classifying PH using the cutoff of DPG >7 mmHg or TPG >15 mmHg, resulted in an almost perfect agreement (κ statistic 0.87; 93.4% agreement). However, in cases of disagreement, occurring with low or negative DPG values, the TPG-based classification was more likely to be correct.
CONCLUSION: The DPG does not add incremental prognostic information beyond PVR. Using DPG/PVR criteria to differentiate between Ipc-PH and Cpc-PH is equivalent to using TPG/PVR criteria with a TPG threshold >15 mmHg. However, the use of DPG for diagnostic purposes may lead to misclassification of PH when DPG is low or negative.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diastolic pulmonary vascular pressure gradient; Heart failure; Hemodynamics; Pulmonary hypertension

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31126737     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of PCWP and LVEDP Measurements in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI-Same Same but Different?

Authors:  Elke Boxhammer; Moritz Mirna; Laura Bäz; Brunilda Alushi; Marcus Franz; Daniel Kretzschmar; Uta C Hoppe; Alexander Lauten; Michael Lichtenauer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Right Heart Catheterization-Background, Physiological Basics, and Clinical Implications.

Authors:  Grzegorz M Kubiak; Agnieszka Ciarka; Monika Biniecka; Piotr Ceranowicz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 4.241

3.  The dangerous and contradictory prognostic significance of PVR<3WU when TAPSE<16mm in postcapillary pulmonary hypertension.

Authors:  Olivier Raitière; Emmanuelle Berthelot; Charles Fauvel; Pierre Guignant; Nassima Si Belkacem; Olivier Sitbon; Fabrice Bauer
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-07-23

4.  Peak oxygen uptake is a strong prognostic predictor for pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease.

Authors:  Xiu-Jun Zhong; Rong Jiang; Lu Yang; Ping Yuan; Su-Gang Gong; Qin-Hua Zhao; Ci-Jun Luo; Hong-Ling Qiu; Hui-Ting Li; Rui Zhang; Jing He; Lan Wang; Jie Tang; Jin-Ming Liu
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 5.  Animal models of pulmonary hypertension due to left heart disease.

Authors:  Shao-Fei Liu; Yi Yan
Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med       Date:  2022-02-09

6.  Conundrum of Classifying Subtypes of Pulmonary Hypertension-Introducing a Novel Approach to Classify "Borderline" Patients in a Population with Severe Aortic Stenosis Undergoing TAVI.

Authors:  Elke Boxhammer; Sarah X Gharibeh; Bernhard Wernly; Malte Kelm; Marcus Franz; Daniel Kretzschmar; Uta C Hoppe; Alexander Lauten; Michael Lichtenauer
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Dev Dis       Date:  2022-09-04

7.  Critical appraisal of the instantaneous end-diastolic pulmonary arterial wedge pressures.

Authors:  Aristomenis Manouras; Lars H Lund; László Gellér; Anikó Ilona Nagy; Jonas Johnson
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2020-10-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.