Meera Nair Harhay1, Karthik Ranganna2, Suzanne M Boyle2, Antonia M Brown2, Thalia Bajakian2, Lissa B Levin Mizrahi2, Gary Xiao3, Stephen Guy3, Gregory Malat3, Dorry L Segev4, David Reich3, Mara McAdams-DeMarco4. 1. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: mnh52@drexel.edu. 2. Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 3. Division of Multiorgan Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. 4. Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
Abstract
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: There is debate on whether weight loss, a hallmark of frailty, signals higher risk for adverse outcomes among recipients of deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Using national Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, we included all DDKT recipients in the United States between December 4, 2004, and December 3, 2014, who were adults (aged ≥ 18 years) when listed for DDKT. EXPOSURES: Relative pre-DDKT weight change as a continuous predictor and categorized as <5% weight change from listing to DDKT, ≥5% to <10% weight loss, ≥10% weight loss, ≥5% to <10% weight gain, and ≥10% weight gain. OUTCOMES: We examined 3 post-DDKT outcomes: (1) transplant hospitalization length of stay (LOS) in days, (2) all-cause graft failure, and (3) mortality. ANALYTIC APPROACH: Unadjusted fractional polynomial methods, multivariable log-gamma models, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 94,465 recipients of DDKT, median pre-DDKT weight change was 0 (interquartile range, -3.5 to +3.9) kg. There were nonlinear unadjusted associations between relative pre-DDKT weight loss and longer transplant hospitalization LOS, higher all-cause graft loss, and higher mortality. Compared with recipients with <5% pre-DDKT weight change (n = 49,366; 52%), recipients who lost ≥10% of their listing weight (n = 10,614; 11%) had 0.66 (95% CI, 0.23-1.09) days longer average transplant hospitalization LOS (P = 0.003), 1.11-fold higher graft loss (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06-1.17; P < 0.001), and 1.18-fold higher mortality (aHR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.25; P < 0.001) independent of recipient, donor, and transplant factors. Pre-DDKT dialysis exposure, listing body mass index category, and waiting time modified the association of pre-DDKT weight change with hospital LOS (interaction P < 0.10), but not with all-cause graft loss and mortality. LIMITATIONS: Unmeasured confounders and inability to identify volitional weight change. Also, the higher significance level set to increase the power of detecting interactions with the fixed sample size may have resulted in increased risk for type 1 error. CONCLUSIONS: DDKT recipients with ≥10% pre-DDKT weight loss are at increased risk for adverse outcomes and may benefit from augmented support post-DDKT.
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: There is debate on whether weight loss, a hallmark of frailty, signals higher risk for adverse outcomes among recipients of deceased donor kidney transplantation (DDKT). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Using national Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, we included all DDKT recipients in the United States between December 4, 2004, and December 3, 2014, who were adults (aged ≥ 18 years) when listed for DDKT. EXPOSURES: Relative pre-DDKT weight change as a continuous predictor and categorized as <5% weight change from listing to DDKT, ≥5% to <10% weight loss, ≥10% weight loss, ≥5% to <10% weight gain, and ≥10% weight gain. OUTCOMES: We examined 3 post-DDKT outcomes: (1) transplant hospitalization length of stay (LOS) in days, (2) all-cause graft failure, and (3) mortality. ANALYTIC APPROACH: Unadjusted fractional polynomial methods, multivariable log-gamma models, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 94,465 recipients of DDKT, median pre-DDKT weight change was 0 (interquartile range, -3.5 to +3.9) kg. There were nonlinear unadjusted associations between relative pre-DDKT weight loss and longer transplant hospitalization LOS, higher all-cause graft loss, and higher mortality. Compared with recipients with <5% pre-DDKT weight change (n = 49,366; 52%), recipients who lost ≥10% of their listing weight (n = 10,614; 11%) had 0.66 (95% CI, 0.23-1.09) days longer average transplant hospitalization LOS (P = 0.003), 1.11-fold higher graft loss (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.11; 95% CI, 1.06-1.17; P < 0.001), and 1.18-fold higher mortality (aHR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.11-1.25; P < 0.001) independent of recipient, donor, and transplant factors. Pre-DDKT dialysis exposure, listing body mass index category, and waiting time modified the association of pre-DDKT weight change with hospital LOS (interaction P < 0.10), but not with all-cause graft loss and mortality. LIMITATIONS: Unmeasured confounders and inability to identify volitional weight change. Also, the higher significance level set to increase the power of detecting interactions with the fixed sample size may have resulted in increased risk for type 1 error. CONCLUSIONS: DDKT recipients with ≥10% pre-DDKT weight loss are at increased risk for adverse outcomes and may benefit from augmented support post-DDKT.
Authors: Alvin Thomas; Christine E Haugen; Alexandra Mountford; Fatima Warsame; Rachel Berkowitz; Sunjae Bae; Charles H Brown; Daniel C Brennan; Karin J Neufeld; Michelle C Carlson; Dorry L Segev; Mara McAdams-DeMarco Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2018-04-23 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Mehdi Rambod; Rachelle Bross; Jennifer Zitterkoph; Deborah Benner; Juhi Pithia; Sara Colman; Csaba P Kovesdy; Joel D Kopple; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2008-12-13 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: S D Navaneethan; J P Kirwan; S Arrigain; M J Schreiber; A R Sehgal; J D Schold Journal: Int J Obes (Lond) Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 5.095
Authors: Mara A McAdams-DeMarco; Andrew Law; Megan L Salter; Brian Boyarsky; Luis Gimenez; Bernard G Jaar; Jeremy D Walston; Dorry L Segev Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2013-05-27 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Jesse D Schold; Joshua J Augustine; Anne M Huml; Richard Fatica; Saul Nurko; Alvin Wee; Emilio D Poggio Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2020-08-27 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Maria Irene Bellini; Kostas Koutroutsos; Hannah Nananpragasam; Emily Deurloo; Jack Galliford; Paul Elliot Herbert Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2020-01 Impact factor: 1.671
Authors: Elaine Ku; Adrian M Whelan; Charles E McCulloch; Brian Lee; Claus U Niemann; Garrett R Roll; Barbara A Grimes; Kirsten L Johansen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-11-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Gabriel C Oniscu; Daniel Abramowicz; Davide Bolignano; Ilaria Gandolfini; Rachel Hellemans; Umberto Maggiore; Ionut Nistor; Stephen O'Neill; Mehmet Sukru Sever; Muguet Koobasi; Evi V Nagler Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2021-12-24 Impact factor: 5.992