| Literature DB >> 31126300 |
Ana Cláudia Pereira Dos Santos Cruz1, Simone Dutra Lucas1, Lívia Guimarães Zina1, Rafaela da Silveira Pinto2, Maria Inês Barreiros Senna1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The number of oral health technicians (OHT) in the public health service in Brazil is lower than the number of training school graduates. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate possible factors associated with the inclusion of OHT in the public health service in Minas Gerais, Brazil, and its implications on oral health indicators.Entities:
Keywords: Allied health personnel; Dental hygienists; Health management; Health manpower; Health workforce; Public oral health
Year: 2019 PMID: 31126300 PMCID: PMC6534839 DOI: 10.1186/s12960-019-0371-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Resour Health ISSN: 1478-4491
Dependent and independent variables of the study
| Contextual dimensions | Variables | Categories | Reference year | Data sources | Rationale for categorization | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Entry of OHT into the public service | Yes No | 2015 | Search database | Based on the results of the research “Evaluation of the impact of training of Oral Health Technicians in the public health network in the state of Minas Gerais” [ | |
| Independent variables | Health services organization | Population coverage of FHT | < 100% | 2011 | DAB | Ideally the coverage should be 100% [ |
| = 100% | 2014 | |||||
| Population coverage of DHT | < 70% | 2011 | DAB | Median of the state of Minas Gerais | ||
| ≥ 70% | 2014 | |||||
| DHT/FHT ratio | < 70% | 2011 | DAB | Median of the state of Minas Gerais | ||
| ≥ 70% | 2014 | |||||
| Presence of DHT modality II | Yes | 2011 | DATASUS | Has or does not have OHT | ||
| No | 2014 | |||||
| Proportion of dentists per 1 000 inhabitants | < 0.67 | 2011 | DATASUS | Calculation for 1 000 inhabitants, based on the recommendation of the old Ordinance n° 1 101 of the dentist for at least 1 500 inhabitants [ | ||
| ≥ 0.67 | 2014 | |||||
| Oral health indicators | Indicator of coverage of the first dental programmatic consultation | < 15% | 2011 | DATASUS | National reference value of the Basic Attention Pact [ | |
| ≥ 15% | 2014 | |||||
| Indicator of coverage of the collective action of supervised dental brushing | < 3.5% | 2011 | DATASUS | National reference value of the Basic Attention Pact [ | ||
| ≥ 3.5% | 2014 | |||||
| Sociodemographic variables | MHDI | < 0.731 | 2010 | IBGE | HDI value of the state of Minas Gerais [ | |
| ≥ 0.731 | ||||||
| Gini index | < 0.5634 | 2010 | DATASUS | Median of the state of Minas Gerais | ||
| ≥ 0.5634 | ||||||
| Population size | < 10.000 | 2010 | IBGE | 44.54% of the municipalities of Minas Gerais have less than 10 000 inhabitants [ | ||
| ≥ 10.000 | ||||||
Fig. 1Situation of municipalities in relation to their participation in the oral health technician course, in the research and entry into the public health service, Minas Gerais, 2015
Frequency distribution of the context variables of the municipalities surveyed before and after the OHT course, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2014
| Municipal variables | 2011 | 2014 | |||
|
| % |
| % | ||
| Health services organization | Population coverage of FHT | ||||
| < 100% | 89 | 73.0 | 70 | 57.4 | |
| = 100% | 33 | 27.0 | 52 | 42.6 | |
| Population coverage of DHT | |||||
| < 70% | 73 | 59.8 | 62 | 50.8 | |
| ≥ 70% | 49 | 40.2 | 60 | 49.2 | |
| ESB/ESF ratio | |||||
| < 70% | 62 | 50.8 | 56 | 45.9 | |
| ≥ 70% | 60 | 49.2 | 66 | 54.1 | |
| Presence of DHT modality II | |||||
| Yes | 33 | 27.0 | 38 | 31.1 | |
| No | 89 | 73.0 | 84 | 68.9 | |
| Dentists per 1 000 inhabitants | |||||
| < 0.67 | 83 | 68.0 | 81 | 66.4 | |
| ≥ 0.67 | 39 | 32.0 | 41 | 33.6 | |
| Oral health indicators | First consultation | ||||
| < 15% | 77 | 63.1 | 91 | 74.6 | |
| ≥ 15% | 45 | 36.9 | 31 | 25.4 | |
| Supervised dental brushing | |||||
| < 3.5 | 66 | 54.1 | 68 | 55.7 | |
| ≥ 3.5 | 56 | 45.9 | 54 | 44.3 | |
| Sociodemographic indicators | 2010 | ||||
|
| % | ||||
| MHDI | |||||
| < 0.731 | 102 | 83.6 | |||
| ≥ 0.731 | 20 | 16.4 | |||
| Gini Index | |||||
| < 0.5634 | 114 | 93.4 | |||
| ≥ 0.5634 | 8 | 6.6 | |||
| Population size | |||||
| < 10 000 inhabitants | 40 | 32.8 | |||
| ≥ 10 000 inhabitants | 82 | 67.2 | |||
Data sources: DAB, DATASUS, IBGE
Frequency distribution of sociodemographic variables according to the entry of OHT into the public health service in the participating municipalities, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2010
| Variables | Categories | 2010 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entered | Not entered | |||||
|
| % |
| % | |||
| MHDI | ||||||
| < 0.731 | 13 | 12.7 | 89 | 87.3 | 0.785 | |
| ≥ 0.731 | 3 | 15.0 | 17 | 85.0 | ||
| Gini index | ||||||
| < 0.5634 | 15 | 13.2 | 99 | 86.8 | 0.985 | |
| ≥ 0.5634 | 1 | 12.5 | 7 | 87.5 | ||
| Population size | ||||||
| < 10 000 inhabitants | 7 | 17.5 | 33 | 82.5 | 0.316 | |
| ≥ 10 000 inhabitants | 9 | 11.0 | 73 | 89.0 | ||
*Chi-square test
Data sources: DATASUS, IBGE
Bivariate analysis between the health service organization variables and oral health indicators according to the entry of the OHT into the public health service in the participating municipalities, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2014
| Variables | 2011 | 2014 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entered | Not entered | Entered | Not entered | ||||||||
|
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | ||||
| Health services organization | Population coverage of FHT | ||||||||||
| < 100% | 11 | 12.4 | 78 | 87.6 | 0.685 | 10 | 14.3 | 60 | 85.7 | 0.657 | |
| = 100% | 5 | 15.2 | 28 | 84.8 | 6 | 11.5 | 46 | 88.5 | |||
| Population coverage of DHT | |||||||||||
| < 70% | 9 | 12.3 | 64 | 87.7 | 0.754 | 7 | 11.3 | 55 | 88.7 | 0.544 | |
| ≥ 70% | 7 | 14.3 | 42 | 85.7 | 9 | 15.0 | 51 | 85.0 | |||
| DHT/FHT ratio | |||||||||||
| < 70% | 9 | 14.5 | 53 | 85.5 | 0.641 | 5 | 8.9 | 51 | 91.1 | 0.207 | |
| ≥ 70% | 7 | 11.7 | 53 | 88.3 | 11 | 16.7 | 55 | 83.3 | |||
| Presence of DHT modality II | |||||||||||
| No | 11 | 12.4 | 78 | 87.6 | 0.685 | 7 | 8.3 | 77 | 91.7 | 0.020 | |
| Yes | 5 | 15.2 | 28 | 84.8 | 9 | 23.7 | 29 | 76.3 | |||
| Dentists per 1 000 inhabitants | |||||||||||
| < 0.67 | 12 | 14.5 | 71 | 85.5 | 0.521 | 10 | 12.3 | 71 | 87.7 | 0.724 | |
| ≥ 0.67 | 4 | 10.3 | 35 | 89.7 | 6 | 14.6 | 35 | 85.4 | |||
| Oral health indicators | First consultation | ||||||||||
| < 15% | 9 | 11.7 | 68 | 88.3 | 0.541 | 9 | 9.9 | 82 | 90.1% | 0.071 | |
| ≥ 15% | 7 | 15.6 | 38 | 84.4 | 7 | 22.6 | 24 | 77.4% | |||
| Supervised dental brushing | |||||||||||
| < 3.5 | 8 | 12.1 | 58 | 87.9 | 0.724 | 4 | 5.9 | 64 | 94.1% | 0.008 | |
| ≥ 3.5 | 8 | 14.3 | 48 | 85.7 | 12 | 22.2 | 42 | 77.8% | |||
* Chi-square test
Data sources: DATASUS, IBGE
Unadjusted and adjusted analyses for the variables of organization of health services and indicators of oral health for the year 2014, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 2014
| Variable | Category | 2014 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| ||
| Organization of health services | Presence of DHT modality II | ||||
| No | Ref | 0.025 | Ref | 0.075 | |
| Yes | 3.41 (1.16–10.01) | 2.76 (0.90–8.50) | |||
| Oral health indicators | Frist consultation | ||||
| < 15% | Ref | 0.078 | Ref | 0.191 | |
| ≥ 15% | 2.65 (0.89–7.88) | 2.15 (0.68–6.80) | |||
| Supervised dental brushing | |||||
| < 3.5 | Ref | 0.013 | Ref | 0.045 | |
| ≥ 3.5 | 4.57 (1.38–15.12) | 3.53 (1.02–12.14) | |||
OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval, Ref reference category
Data sources: DAB, DATASUS