| Literature DB >> 31126014 |
Hyeongmin Son1, Sol Moi Park2, Joon Ho Seo3, Haeng Ki Lee4.
Abstract
This present study investigates the effects of CaSO4 incorporation on the pore structure and drying shrinkage of alkali-activated slag and fly ash. The slag and fly ash were activated at a 5:5 ratio by weighing with a sodium silicate. Thereafter, 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% of CaSO4 were incorporated to investigate the changes in phase formation and internal pore structure. X-Ray Diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetry (TG)/derivative thermogravimetry (DTG), mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and drying shrinkage tests were carried out to find the correlation between the pore structure and drying shrinkage of the specimens. The results showed that CaSO4 incorporation increased the formation of thenardite, and these phase changes affected the pore structure of the activated fly ash and slag. The increase in the CaSO4 content increased the pore distribution in the mesopore. As a result, the capillary tension and drying shrinkage decreased.Entities:
Keywords: CaSO4; drying shrinkage; fly ash; pore structure; slag
Year: 2019 PMID: 31126014 PMCID: PMC6566818 DOI: 10.3390/ma12101673
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Chemical composition of fly ash and slag used in this study.
| (wt %) | SiO2 | Al2O3 | Fe2O3 | CaO | MgO | P2O5 | TiO2 | K2O | SO3 | LOI a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fly ash | 50.0 | 21.0 | 10.0 | 4.8 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.4 | 1.0 | 2.71 |
| Slag | 32.4 | 11.5 | 0.6 | 47.7 | 3.0 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 2.7 | 0.29 |
a Loss on ignition.
Mix composition of the specimens.
| Specimen Code | Slag | Fly Ash | Gypsum | Water | Sand | W/B a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0.4 | 2 | 0.40 |
| G5 | 0.475 | 0.475 | 0.05 | 0.4 | 2 | 0.40 |
| G10 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.1 | 0.4 | 2 | 0.40 |
| G15 | 0.425 | 0.425 | 0.15 | 0.4 | 2 | 0.40 |
a Water/binder ratio.
Figure 1Drying shrinkage of the specimens.
Figure 2Mass change of the specimens.
Figure 3The ratio of drying shrinkage of the specimens.
Figure 4X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the specimens on the (a) 7th day and (b) 28th day.
Figure 5Thermogravimetric (TG)/DTG results on the (a) 7th day and (b) 28th day.
Figure 627Al nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) of the specimens on the 28th day.
Figure 729Si NMR of the specimens on the 28th day, (a) 0% CaSO4, (b) 5% CaSO4, (c) 10% CaSO4.
Figure 8Pore size distribution on the 28th day.
Pore characteristics on the 28th day.
| Specimen Code | Porosity (vol %) | Total Pore Area (m2/g) | Average Pore Diameter (nm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| G0 | 33.35 | 103.791 | 8.1 |
| G5 | 33.74 | 77.919 | 11.9 |
| G10 | 38.17 | 50.620 | 20.4 |
| G15 | 43.05 | 40.908 | 29.7 |